Chris Froome extends with Sky - but Sir Bradley Wiggins on the way out?

2013:

It was great to watch Froome attacking in the mountains.

It was horrible to watch Wiggins descending like an amateur (Giro), not worthy of a former tour winner.

Tour for 2014: Bauke Mollema on the podium!

I work from home each year to watch every minute of the TdF. I love Wiggo to bits but Froome is a much more entertaining rider.

Wiggo is brilliant at monitoring his power output and grinding the miles away. But Froome has a fantastic balance of monitoring his power output whilst riding on instinct to attack at the right time and crush the opposition.

Granted he's a nice bloke and pretty much the perfect professional athlete. To some that may be boring but I think he has a great opportunity to get his name down in history alongside Merckx, Indurain etc if he can avoid injury and any misfortune.

If you haven't watched a complete tour it'd be worthwhile starting to sweet talk your gaffer to spend three weeks at home next July, this guy is a bit special.

One name I would have liked to have seen on there is Ben Swift but I guess he has to prove himself in 2014 following his op this year. Does anyone know when he's contracted until?

f1, like cycling, when televised, doesn't work without the personalities.

Like them or not, Schumacher, Alesi, senna, all shied their personality n their driving style, replicated out with the cockpit.

Froome, Andy Murray, Lewis Hamilton, Vettell......?

As a mate said, just think how popular Andy Murray would be if he was a tennis playing Jenson button.

Froome was a far more convincing winner and he showed more than a little panache on the Ventoux, whereas apart from leading out Cav on the Champs Elysees Wiggins seemed rather more workmanlike in his style.

Froome is younger and more likely to adhere to Sky's media sensibilities - whilst undeniably very well funded and professionsl they strike me as a bit control-freaky and not very rock and roll and perhaps Wiggo is too much of a loose cannon, especially given his previous behaviour.

Chapeau to Wiggo as he's achieved history and got the t shirt, but he strikes me as someone who realises he's hit the very highest of highs and that he can't sustain it, and I fear that the motivation has diminished.

Sky won't dominate for years. Other teams will adopt their training methodologies and riders who move on will pass the knowledge to their new team. I think Contador will have upped his game for this season also, he was embarrassed this tour he won't of liked that. I think this is going to be a good season.

I prefer Froomes fiance to Wiggo's wife..Froome gets my vote

at the end of the day, bike races aren't won in interviews.

at the end of the day, bike races aren't won in interviews.

Let's face it, the Meerkat is a more exciting racer, but lacks the "personality" off the bike Wiggo has. Not actually sure which I prefer. Was great watching Wiggo win the Tour, but was about as interesting as some of Indurain's TT based lockouts. Watching Froome chew the stem up those hills on the attack against the best climbers was far more enthralling.

In fact the most interesting bit of Wiggo's win was when Froome attacked "accidentally"... After all, if he was able to have made up enough time to win outright, shouldn't he really be sitting on 2 Tour victories? Or is that blasphemy?

So really it's a choice between entertainment in the race, and entertainment after the race...

Horses for courses isn't it?

I prefer Wiggins as a rider and a character despite his riding style being as exciting as... well something lacking excitement...

For me I think this is because Wiggins always seems like he is stepping up and achieving something a little beyond his skills... a great TT guy yes, but tour winner? And the sporting spectacle of him achieving what on paper seems beyond him is to me great sport.

Froome riding style is a lot more animated, however it is clear that he's the best guy in the field. Watching him race is like watching a guy with an automatic rifle in a knife fight.

Bobbinogs it totally right, those comments about Froome being boring it, what are you guys on ? Wiggo's tour win was the most boring tour in years, lets win 2 time trails and then try to keep with the climbers, no attacks, I love Wiggo as a rider and a person, he is very interesting, but his riding was boring but effective.

Now Froome, he attacks, he is unpredictable, keeps with the leaders without his team, how he survived that Moivestar attack still amazes me, he time trials like a deranged animal with his style of riding, yes I would agree he doesn't have the charisma of Wiggo but I watch the racers for the racing and not the personality/interviews.

I'd rather see Froome attacking up Mont Ventoux the way he did this year, than Wiggo dominate on the errr......time trial like he did last year.

There is no comparison in terms of who is a better more exciting rider to watch/respect.

.

I wouldn't assume that SKY will dominate the Tour for years to come - as a team in the 2013 edition they weren't in control of the race to the same extent as in 2012, and there were days when, if Froome hadn't been at the top of his game he'd have lost time. Yes, Froome currently looks head and shoulders the best all round rider, but Nibali, for example, isn't a million miles away.

This is the tine to enjoy Brirish success on the road...it might not last for ever.

As for Froome being boring...it takes all sorts. I wouldn't like to watch a team full of Wiggos any more than a team full of Froomes.

Don't understand why he is being tagged as boring, he rides in an attacking style compared to most modern riders. I think the story about how he got into the world tt championships by pretending to be the national cycling federation is one of the funniest stories in cycling and shows personality and determination in abundance. There are also not many riders that used to get chased by hippos on there club run.I don't think he will dominate cycling next year but if he does it will be totally deserved as he has worked hard to get there.You cant blame a rider for being better than others,its up to the rest to close the gap and make it competitive.Theres no such thing as an easy cycle race.

If Sky is only focusing on the TdF then I agree with everything above, it will be quite boring, and best that Wiggo moves on.

If British teams/riders start concentrating on other big races it can only be a good thing for the sport.

Personally I want to see Wiggo back on the track

I think the notion that Sky are going to dominate the Tour de France the next 'x' number of years is not something I'd bet on. All you need is some bad weather or a puncture at the wrong time and your tour is over. Its far from a done deal.

Agree with all the above.

Even the most boring bike race I've ever seen is infinitely more interesting than any F1.

Just can't seem to like Froome at all.. Yes he's very impressive but boring.

Clearly, Froomey's an excellent bike rider. And I don't want to sound unpatriotic or spoilt by recent British success. But am I alone in finding the prospect of Froome/Sky dominating Le Tour for years to come about as exciting as Vettel/Red Bull stranglehold on F1?

We already know that Wiggins won't be signing a new deal. He said so himself a few months ago...

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/wiggins-to-quit-major-road-racing-in-2014