Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

CTC rejects calls to back minimum passing distance - but what do you think?

Vote in our poll to help us discover what Britain's cyclists really think...

The cyclists’ organisation CTC has rejected calls to throw its weight behind a campaign to introduce a five-foot-to-pass rule in the UK, and says that its priority is to improve the levels of enforcement of existing traffic laws.

Last week on road.cc, we reported how cycling safety campaigner Joe Mizereck, whose website www.3feetplease.com has helped have a three-foot minimum passing distance introduced in a number of states in the US, had backed moves to seek a five-foot minimum in the UK, and had thrown the gauntlet down for CTC to do likewise.

Such a rule would bring the country into line with several other EU member states where a 1.5-metre minimum passing distance has been adopted, such as Germany, Spain and, other than in urban areas where it is 1 metre, France.

Mizereck, who dreamt up his campaign’s ‘3 feet please’ cycling jersey, had initially suggested on road.cc that CTC back Tom Amos’s petition to have a similar rule implemented in the UK. But on learning that 1.5 metres was the law elsewhere in Europe, and that a separate petition had been launched seeking five-foot clearance, he agreed that it made sense for cyclists here to push for a minimum of five feet.

CTC doesn’t share his opinion, however. Its campaigns co-ordinator, Debra Rolfe, told road.cc: “If we thought it was a good idea to support this, we’d be supporting it because we work for the cycling community and that’s what we’ve been doing for 130 years.”

According to Rolfe, “There’s very many ways that Britain differs from the rest of Europe in how it protects cyclists and this [the minimum passing distance] is only one of them. We feel like it’s a bit of a red herring and that legislating a minimum passing distance is not even going to begin to address the problems that we’re facing in the UK.”

She continued, “We feel that the major problem is the lack of traffic law enforcement and that’s why we’re running the Stop SMIDSY campaign, and one of the things we’re calling for in the Stop SMIDSY campaign is increased resources towards road traffic policing.”

As for Mizereck and his 3-foot-please campaign, Rolfe maintains that “sometimes with policy changes, they can’t be summarised on a T-shirt.”

But given the number and nature of comments road.cc has received on this subject during in recent weeks during our coverage of the three-foot petition and subsequent moves to seek a five-foot minimum instead, it’s clear that there are a lot of British cyclists out there who would like to see some kind of minimum safe passing distance enshrined in law.

It’s clear that irrespective of Mizereck’s involvement, it’s an issue is now a hot topic of debate in the UK cycling community, so tell us what you think – is CTC right in its current stance, or would you like to see them press for a minimum safe passing distance when overtaking on British roads?

We’ve put a poll up on road.cc, which you’ll find here, and we’re very interested in finding out what you think.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

34 comments

Avatar
DaSy replied to Tom Amos | 15 years ago
1 like
Tom Amos wrote:

I guess it's important for Ms Rolfe to remind us that the CTC have been working in cyclist's interests for 130 years because otherwise one might actually wonder what they do.

Tom Amos, I was not trying to quote you, or put words in your mouth; the inference however, of the part I have quoted above is that the CTC did nothing tangible of benefit to cyclists.

I for one don't wonder what they do, and am very happy with the service they provide to the cycling community.

Avatar
jobysp | 15 years ago
0 likes

LOL @ Hammy

Perhaps all we all need is a 5ft stick sticking out the right of our bikes, and then, if a car hits - we know they are too close?

Avatar
John_the_Monkey | 15 years ago
0 likes

3 feet is probably enough if you're being passed at 30 mph by a car.

No way is it enough if the overtaking vehicle is a truck travelling at 70.

I'm sceptical about yet another law, personally - look how the law on handsfree mobiles is enforced now...

Avatar
Hammy | 15 years ago
0 likes

As for Mizereck and his 3-foot-please campaign, Rolfe maintains that “sometimes with policy changes, they can’t be summarised on a T-shirt.”

But you can summarise them by dressing someone up as a lion then?

Pages

Latest Comments