Chris Froome says questions remain over Sir Bradley Wiggins’ use of triamcinolone under a therapeutic use exemption (TUE). However, both he and Mark Cavendish agree that it is impossible to make firm statements about whether it was right or wrong without knowing the exact details of Wiggins’ medical condition.
Speaking to Cycling News, Froome said he was surprised when news emerged of Wiggins’ TUEs as it was the first he’d heard of them.
He said: “Without knowing the exact details of his medical condition, it’s impossible to say if he was operating in a grey area. I had seen Bradley Wiggins using his inhalers so I knew he had asthma, but I wasn’t aware of his allergies.”
Speaking to The Telegraph, Cavendish said: “Maybe Brad needed a TUE legitimately; maybe he could have used something else. But unless you know, it is just speculation. And I’m not going to speculate.
The sprinter drew a parallel with perceptions of his collision with Korean Park Sang-hoon during the Omnium points race at the Olympics.
“You can crop a picture any way you want,” he said. “Even I look at it and go ‘fuck’. Anybody can speculate that it was malicious. You can twist it to how you want. But unless you know, unless you are that person, it is just speculation.”
Froome was granted a TUE to use prednisolone – a drug used to treat various inflammatory and autoimmune conditions – at the 2013 Criterium du Dauphiné and the 2014 Tour de Romandie. Asked the difference between his use of TUEs and Wiggins’ applications, Froome said that he didn’t believe there were alternative treatments for his condition.
“In 2014, I had an asthma exacerbation following the prologue at the Tour de Romandie. I had serious trouble breathing, which was visible to everyone, including journalists who tried to interview me after the stage.
“The team applied for an emergency TUE for a short course of prednisolone. This is the standard treatment for post-infection inflammation in asthmatics that cannot be controlled by standard inhalers. I don’t believe that there are any alternative treatments, and performance enhancement is negligible.”
Add new comment
36 comments
Think we might have been there in the '80s and suspicious a tad earlier.
because that was a seriously heavy bike.
..and why would that be andyp ?
Froome's getting a remarkably easy ride concerning his own TUE, no?
(edit: one TUE, not multiple.) Still wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw a Trek Activator II, mind.
Froome's TUEs were already public knowledge - the release just confirmed what he'd previously stated. If anything, they made him look better, due to proving he was truthful.
Whereas Wiggins' appear to be contrary to quite vocal statements he's made in the past, misinterpreted or not.
But he has a doctor's note.
So it must be true.
Pages