Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Former chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Cycling Group writes to Prime Minister about Grayling incident

Says Grayling is guilty of at least one traffic offence and asks what action will be taken

The former chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Cycling Group has written to the Prime Minister and police to ask what action will be taken following the incident in which Transport Secretary Chris Grayling knocked a cyclist off his bike with a car door.

Ian Austin, Labour MP for Dudley North, agrees with Cycling UK that Grayling committed at least one traffic offence.

He cites Regulation 105 of the Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986: “No person shall open, or cause or permit to be opened, any door of a vehicle on a road so as to injure or endanger any person.”

In addition, Section 170 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 requires details to be provided in a collision which results in injury to another road user (or to an animal, or damage to another vehicle or other nearby property). Failing that, the person must report the incident to the police (under subsection 3) with failure to do either an offence.

Austin writes:

“Film of the incident shows that Mr Grayling’s door had been flung open, hitting the cyclist and leaving the rider in a state of shock on the pavement. Mr Grayling left after speaking to the cyclist but did not give his details.

“Paul Maynard, a junior Transport Minister, who was also in the car, can be seen swiftly walking away, whilst Mr Grayling’s special adviser Simon Jones hides his identity badge in his pocket.”

Austin says the incident, which took place in October, highlights the vulnerability of cyclists and then goes on to highlight claims subsequently made by Grayling that cycle lanes in the capital are poorly designed on the grounds that, “there are places where they perhaps cause too much of a problem for road users.”

“This shows how vulnerable cyclists are and it does show how careful we all have to be.

“Opening a car door in a way that injures someone is an offence and can result in serious injury and even death. Despite this, Mr Grayling didn’t even provide his details so he could pay for the damage, Mr Maynard couldn’t get away quick enough and their adviser tried to hide his identity badge.

“Anyone can make a mistake, but I don’t think you can have a Secretary of State who has injured another road user, could have committed an offence and failed even to provide his details afterwards.

“And then later, after causing this incident, the Secretary of State complained about cyclists and cycle lanes in London.

“Can I ask what investigation has been carried out into this incident and what action will be taken against Mr Grayling as a result?”

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

36 comments

Avatar
burtthebike replied to Bluebug | 7 years ago
2 likes

[/quote]

In short Chris Grayling is a s***  Transport Secretary and if he had an sense of decency would resign. 

[/quote]

He's a tory, they have a congenital condition and are born without a sense of decency.

Avatar
rliu | 7 years ago
8 likes

Very fact that there is any debate over this says to me cyclist campaigners have to keep fighting for:

  • cycle training mandatory as part of driving test
  • maintaining the burden of proof to be placed on car occupants in collisions with cyclists
Avatar
nbrus | 7 years ago
10 likes

All pedestrians should have number plates fitted and appropriate insurance when out on a public highway, then they would be easy to identify and covered for any incidents ... LOL.  Just saying... yes

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 7 years ago
9 likes

At the very least, he should pay for the damage to the bike.

Avatar
Grahamd replied to hawkinspeter | 7 years ago
7 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

At the very least, he should pay for the damage to the bike.

At the very least he should be prosecuted to the maximum level given his position and influence.

Avatar
Rapha Nadal replied to Grahamd | 7 years ago
5 likes

Grahamd wrote:

hawkinspeter wrote:

At the very least, he should pay for the damage to the bike.

At the very least he should be prosecuted to the maximum level given his position and influence.

Executed would be a better result.

Pages

Latest Comments