Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Video: Shocking moment driver rear-ends cyclist in Tennessee

Motorist arrested and faces multiple charges, cyclist "doing ok" in hospital...

Shocking footage from Tennessee that was posted to Facebook shows the moment the driver of an SUV rear-ended a cyclist, apparently on purpose.

The incident took place on Saturday on Natchez Trace Parkway in Franklin, Tennessee, a location administered by the National Park Service (NPS) and where there is signage highlighting that cyclists are entitled to use the entire width of the lane.

Writing on Facebook on Saturday, Greg Goodman said: "Three hours ago this person intentionally hit my friend Tyler Noe on Natchez Trace.

"We had a witness behind us who said he has seen this same Volvo try to hit someone else last week.

"Tyler is at the hospital and doing ok. He is one TOUGH DUDE!"

In a statement on Facebook, the NPS said that Marshall Grant Neely III, 58, from Franklin had been arrested on Saturday evening and charged with felony reckless endangerment, leaving the scene of an accident, failure to immediately notify of an accident and failure to render aid.

It added that NPS park rangers would be meeting with the U.S. Attorney's Office to consider additional federal charges.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

42 comments

Avatar
Glasgow Cyclist replied to don simon fbpe | 7 years ago
4 likes

don simon wrote:

Thank god he was wearing a helmet.

 

Why?  It doesn't appear to touch the ground or the car.

Avatar
The _Kaner replied to Glasgow Cyclist | 7 years ago
4 likes
Glasgow Cyclist wrote:

don simon wrote:

Thank god he was wearing a helmet.

 

Why?  It doesn't appear to touch the ground or the car.

The irony of it all...
Or is this also ironically being ironic...

Avatar
burtthebike replied to The _Kaner | 7 years ago
1 like

The _Kaner wrote:
Glasgow Cyclist wrote:

don simon wrote:

Thank god he was wearing a helmet.

 

Why?  It doesn't appear to touch the ground or the car.

The irony of it all... Or is this also ironically being ironic...

I'm not sure if the original comment was irony?  Or wasn't it? 

Let's start another helmet debate and really get the clicks going!

Avatar
abbster replied to burtthebike | 7 years ago
4 likes
burtthebike wrote:

The _Kaner wrote:
Glasgow Cyclist wrote:

don simon wrote:

Thank god he was wearing a helmet.

 

Why?  It doesn't appear to touch the ground or the car.

The irony of it all... Or is this also ironically being ironic...

I'm not sure if the original comment was irony?  Or wasn't it? 

Let's start another helmet debate and really get the clicks going!

I assumed irony (naturally), but now I'm not so sure...

Alas, if only he'd been wearing high viz.

Avatar
don simon fbpe replied to Glasgow Cyclist | 7 years ago
0 likes

Glasgow Cyclist wrote:

don simon wrote:

Thank god he was wearing a helmet.

 

Why?  It doesn't appear to touch the ground or the car.

 

#QED.

Avatar
Glasgow Cyclist replied to don simon fbpe | 7 years ago
0 likes

don simon wrote:

Glasgow Cyclist wrote:

don simon wrote:

Thank god he was wearing a helmet.

 

Why?  It doesn't appear to touch the ground or the car.

 

#QED.

 

QED what?

Avatar
700c replied to Glasgow Cyclist | 7 years ago
0 likes
Glasgow Cyclist wrote:

don simon wrote:

Glasgow Cyclist wrote:

don simon wrote:

Thank god he was wearing a helmet.

 

Why?  It doesn't appear to touch the ground or the car.

 

#QED.

 

QED what?

But it does appear to hit the ground..?

Avatar
don simon fbpe replied to Glasgow Cyclist | 7 years ago
0 likes

Glasgow Cyclist wrote:

don simon wrote:

Glasgow Cyclist wrote:

don simon wrote:

Thank god he was wearing a helmet.

 

Why?  It doesn't appear to touch the ground or the car.

 

#QED.

 

QED what?

Wearing a helemt and no head injury.

Helmets save lives.

Avatar
burtthebike replied to don simon fbpe | 7 years ago
0 likes

[/quote]

Wearing a helemt and no head injury.

Helmets save lives.

[/quote]

No they don't, look at the data, not the "helmet saved my life" stories.

Is this the full half hour argument or just the five minute one?  I was only joking about starting another helmet debate, but some people just don't understand irony or humour I suppose.

Avatar
madcarew replied to Glasgow Cyclist | 7 years ago
0 likes

Glasgow Cyclist wrote:

don simon wrote:

Thank god he was wearing a helmet.

 

Why?  It doesn't appear to touch the ground or the car.

You need to watch more carefully. The back of his hemmet clearly hits the ground as he rolls on his back

Having said that, I don't think his helmet saved him from any injury in this situation

Avatar
fenix | 7 years ago
5 likes

Unbelievable that someone would think it's fine to use a two tonne metal box to hurl a human being out of their way.  I hope he gets jail time for that. Lunatic. 

Avatar
ragnar | 7 years ago
14 likes

That guy was lucky

Why not attempted murder? Looked pretty deliberate to me

Pages

Latest Comments