Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Cycle paths at risk under government plans to restore disused railway lines

Sustrans urges Department for Transport to safeguard routes now used by cyclists and walkers

Cycle paths along the routes of disused rail lines may be under threat after the government said that it is considering restoring some lines that were axed half a century ago for use by trains. Sustrans has urged the government to protect the status of lines now given over to cyclists and pedestrians.

In its new rail strategy, published today, the Department for Transport said it would “look at opportunities to restore capacity lost under Beeching and British Rail cuts of the 1960s and 1970s, where this enables new housing or economic development, or eases congestion elsewhere on the transport system, and offers value for money.”

The Beeching cuts in particular led to the closure of thousands of miles of railway lines throughout Great Britain, though some have reopened to rail traffic in recent years while others have been given a new lease of life as routes for cyclists and walkers.

Those include the Bristol & Bath Railway Path, the Two Tunnels Greenway in Bath, the Deeside Way from Aberdeen to Banchory and part of the Monsal Trail in the Peak District National Park.

Sustrans, whose first route was the Bristol & Bath Railway Path, completed in 1986, called on the government to safeguard former railway lines that had been turned into traffic-free routes for cyclists and pedestrians.

The sustainable transport charity’s chief executive, Xavier Brice, said: “Whilst we welcome the potential re-opening of disused railway lines in principle, it will be critical that the many walking and cycling routes which have been built along some of these lines are also maintained.

“These routes, some of which form the National Cycle Network (NCN), are a critical part of the country's active travel infrastructure and strategy, encouraging people to walk and cycle in a safe environment, as well as providing important commuting access for people choosing to travel actively to work.

He added: “Every year an estimated five million people use the NCN. These trips save the UK economy over £550 million each year by reducing levels of obesity, of this £75 million is saved from the NHS budget.” 

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

33 comments

Avatar
Hirsute | 6 years ago
0 likes

I should have thought it very unpopular with walkers. Older people who want to exercise find such gradients very suitable.

Avatar
monkeytrousers | 6 years ago
11 likes

Why not have both? Surely a path by the side of the line isn't that much of a challenge.

It works on the Cambridge Guided Busway. Mostly. Anyone who's ridden the length of it will know what I mean by mostly. Having to regularly chop and change sides of the route 

Avatar
burtthebike replied to monkeytrousers | 6 years ago
2 likes

monkeytrousers wrote:

Why not have both? Surely a path by the side of the line isn't that much of a challenge.

It works on the Cambridge Guided Busway. Mostly. Anyone who's ridden the length of it will know what I mean by mostly. Having to regularly chop and change sides of the route 

Most of these ex-rail lines were single track lines and were closed because they didn't carry much traffic, partly because they were single track.  This means that it would not be possible, without massive investment, to have a rail line and a proper width shared use path, a fact demonstrated on large sections of these paths, e.g. Bristol/Bath path.  Despite this being a redundant rail line, there are many places where it really isn't wide enough.

If it came to spending lots of money widening a path for cyclists and pedestrians, or just changing it to rail and ignoring the current users, which do you think this government would go for?

Pages

Latest Comments