Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Metropolitan Police officer does stop and search on Black Cyclists Network founder after ‘smelling’ marijuana

Mani Arthur says incident in central London yesterday was “degrading and humiliating”

A Metropolitan Police officer was filmed yesterday performing a stop and search on the founder of the Black Cyclists Network (BCN), claiming that he could smell marijuana on him. The cyclist, Mani Arthur, described it as “a degrading and humiliating experience.”

The incident happened at around 2.39pm yesterday afternoon at the junction of Woburn Place and Euston Road, with the officer stopping Mani Arthur, who was riding with two other BCN members, one of whom filmed what happened.

Posting the video to Instagram, Arthur said: “I was detained and searched by a police officer under the suspicion of ‘smelling’ of marijuana. I was harassed and humiliated in a public space.

“To say that I am pissed off is an understatement. Luckily for me, fellow BCN members Aaron and Hugo were present and recorded the incident.”

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Today was supposed to be a historic moment for @blackcyclistsnetwork and @devercycles. . . This afternoon at around 2.39pm at the junction of Woburn Pls and Euston Rd. I was detained and searched by a police officer under the suspicion of "smelling" of marijuana. I was harassed and humiliated in a public space. . . To say that I am pissed off is an understatement. Luckily for me, fellow BCN members Aaron and Hugo were present and recorded the incident. . . In short, I was waiting in traffic for a green light. Three police officers were crossing the road. The one in the video told me to reverse my bicycle back behind the white line were vehicles have to stop. I was not blocking the pedestrian crossing. . . I told the officer that I would be putting myself in danger if I reversed because a small HGV was sitting directly behind me and I would end up in the driver's blind spot if I followed his instructions. I explained to the officer that usually there are cycle box lanes ahead of vehicle stop lines to protect cyclists and because there is a lack of one, I was using my common sense to avoid putting myself in danger. . . The officer tried again but I resisted and he turned around to join his colleagues as they were walking away. The lights changed to green. . . I was riding off to join Aaron and Hugo, who by that point were in the middle of the junction when I heard a call from the officer to turn back. . . I walked over to the officer on the pavement. He asked for my I.D. and informed me that he smelled cannabis on me during our exchange. As a result he needed to search me for possession. He searched me by the side of the road. Before the search, I asked him and his colleagues if they smell cannabis on me. They said yes. After the search. They conveniently said they did not smell cannabis on me. . . I am very annoyed at having to go through such a degrading and humiliating experience. It seemed to me like a gross abuse of power by an officer who tried to show off to his colleagues and made up a reason as retribution for his failed attempt. . . . @metpolice_uk . .

A post shared by Mani (@blackcyclist) on

Recounting the background to the incident, he wrote: “In short, I was waiting in traffic for a green light. Three police officers were crossing the road.

“The one in the video told me to reverse my bicycle back behind the white line where vehicles have to stop. I was not blocking the pedestrian crossing.

“I told the officer that I would be putting myself in danger if I reversed because a small HGV was sitting directly behind me and I would end up in the driver's blind spot if I followed his instructions.

“I explained to the officer that usually there are cycle box lanes ahead of vehicle stop lines to protect cyclists and because there is a lack of one, I was using my common sense to avoid putting myself in danger.

“The officer tried again but I resisted and he turned around to join his colleagues as they were walking away. The lights changed to green.”

That seemed to have brought the episode to a close, but that was not the case.

“I was riding off to join Aaron and Hugo, who by that point were in the middle of the junction when I heard a call from the officer to turn back,” said Arthur.

“I walked over to the officer on the pavement. He asked for my ID and informed me that he smelled cannabis on me during our exchange.

“As a result he needed to search me for possession. He searched me by the side of the road.

“Before the search, I asked him and his colleagues if they smell cannabis on me. They said yes. After the search. They conveniently said they did not smell cannabis on me.”

He added: “I am very annoyed at having to go through such a degrading and humiliating experience.

“It seemed to me like a gross abuse of power by an officer who tried to show off to his colleagues and made up a reason as retribution for his failed attempt.”

Posting the same video to the Regent’s Park Cyclists group on Facebook, he added: “Anyone that knows me knows that I don’t smoke. I barely drink. This just adds insult to injury.”

British Cycling, when it published its Diversity in Cycling report in June this year, said that it had started “as a grassroots project that was sparked by a conversation between experienced road racer Andy Edwards and Black Cyclists Network founder, Mani Arthur.”

The governing body said that the report, which “sets out to explore the experiences of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) cyclists taking up cycling as a sport for the first time,” would be shared with “its network of volunteers, clubs and members.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

104 comments

Avatar
nicmason replied to vonhelmet | 4 years ago
0 likes
vonhelmet wrote:
nicmason wrote:
Roubaixcobbles wrote:
nicmason wrote:
Roubaixcobbles wrote:
nicmason wrote:
Roubaixcobbles wrote:
nicmason wrote:
Roubaixcobbles wrote:
nicmason wrote:
Peowpeowpeowlasers wrote:

Did the officer witness him crossing the STOP line while the light was red?  If not then he has no right to insist that he move.

For all he knew, the guy might have crossed it while still green, saw the junction was blocked and decided to wait.

I would have stayed right where I was.  Fuck the law on this point, it's stupid.  No way would I sit in a HGV's blind spot.

 

Ok so if it was green but the junction was blocked he shouldnt have gone and the policeman does have right to ask him to move . Or stop being part of the traffic get off the bike and get on the pavement.

Does the policeman also have the right to then make a clearly false allegation that the cyclist smells of marijuana and subject him to a humiliating public body search? Think you're kind of missing the main point here...

 

I'm not commenting on the main point.

Several people have commented that if the police told them to move they wouldn't do it. Maybe they'd close their eyes so they where invisible as well.

Why aren't you commenting on the main point?  Why when the article and video show an egregious example of police racism and exceeding their reasonable powers are you focussing on whether someone's wheel was two feet over the stop line? What's more important here, and why are you insisting on distracting from the obvious and worrying abuse of power against a black man by police by nitpicking about minor traffic regs? What's your motivation?

Because this is a cycling magazinr not a civil rights magazine. 

 

 

Wow.  So a cycling magazine should ignore the police making a racist stop on the cyclist founder of a black cycling campaign when he's out cycling, or if the  magazine does misguidedly report it we should completely ignore the racism and argue about whether the initial contact of the officer telling a cyclist to pull his wheel back a couple of feet was justified?  I've got a feeling you might just be a bit of an old racist yourself there, nic, and by "a feeling" I mean "it's blindingly obvious".

 

Thanks for that man who knows nothing about me .

I do know about you from your comments on here, in which you have repeatedly tried to divert attention away from a prima facie case of police racism into a pointless discussion of traffic laws in a transparent attempt to shift the blame onto the victim of said police racism.  That quite clearly makes you a defender of/apologist for police racism, and that makes you a racist.  

 

Youre quite the one for virtue signalling aren't you .

Virtue signalling is a bullshit term used by people to shut down arguments with people who may actually be more virtuous than them.

 

And calling people racist without any cause is ?

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to roubaixcobbles | 4 years ago
1 like
Roubaixcobbles wrote:
nicmason wrote:
Roubaixcobbles wrote:
nicmason wrote:
Roubaixcobbles wrote:
nicmason wrote:
Peowpeowpeowlasers wrote:

Did the officer witness him crossing the STOP line while the light was red?  If not then he has no right to insist that he move.

For all he knew, the guy might have crossed it while still green, saw the junction was blocked and decided to wait.

I would have stayed right where I was.  Fuck the law on this point, it's stupid.  No way would I sit in a HGV's blind spot.

 

Ok so if it was green but the junction was blocked he shouldnt have gone and the policeman does have right to ask him to move . Or stop being part of the traffic get off the bike and get on the pavement.

Does the policeman also have the right to then make a clearly false allegation that the cyclist smells of marijuana and subject him to a humiliating public body search? Think you're kind of missing the main point here...

 

I'm not commenting on the main point.

Several people have commented that if the police told them to move they wouldn't do it. Maybe they'd close their eyes so they where invisible as well.

Why aren't you commenting on the main point?  Why when the article and video show an egregious example of police racism and exceeding their reasonable powers are you focussing on whether someone's wheel was two feet over the stop line? What's more important here, and why are you insisting on distracting from the obvious and worrying abuse of power against a black man by police by nitpicking about minor traffic regs? What's your motivation?

Because this is a cycling magazinr not a civil rights magazine. 

 

 

Wow.  So a cycling magazine should ignore the police making a racist stop on the cyclist founder of a black cycling campaign when he's out cycling, or if the  magazine does misguidedly report it we should completely ignore the racism and argue about whether the initial contact of the officer telling a cyclist to pull his wheel back a couple of feet was justified?  I've got a feeling you might just be a bit of an old racist yourself there, nic, and by "a feeling" I mean "it's blindingly obvious".

I would want to know how the guy being stopped felt about it - I didn't see him allege racism in the tweet quoted. Though I've known enough black people who commented on how frequently they got stopped and searched/questioned, to find it very likely that race came into it. I'd believe him if he made that argument, but surely it's really up to the guy who got stopped to raise the issue first?

Edit - having looked back at previous posts, I don't agree with nicmason's attitude.

Avatar
nicmason replied to FluffyKittenofTindalos | 4 years ago
0 likes
FluffyKittenofTindalos]
</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>[quote=nicmason

wrote:

[ Edit - having looked back at previous posts, I don't agree with nicmason's attitude.

 

I'm curious. Which bit of my "attitude"

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to nicmason | 4 years ago
2 likes
nicmason]<p>
</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>[quote=Roubaixcobbles

wrote:
nicmason wrote:

[ Edit - having looked back at previous posts, I don't agree with nicmason's attitude.

 

I'm curious. Which bit of my "attitude"

"Attitude" was the wrong word - should have said "comments". But the word was in my mind because posters keep using it about this cyclist, and it does have a certain racial implication in the way it gets used.

But I disagree with:

Your focus exclusively on a minor side-issue.

That you leapt in to take issue with a poster who was expressing an understandable irritation at the double-standards employed by the police. Regardless of whether I would say the same thing, or entirely agree, I get why they might feel that way.

That you _seem_ to have the view that one should obey the police because they are always right - when I'd say I would mainly obey them simply because they have power, so personally I wouldn't want to take the risk of not doing so. I prefer a quiet life, me.

Both from a few personal experiences and those of people I know, and from numerous news stories, it seems to me they are quite often wrong, both about the law and about the safe thing to do (Hillsborough comes to mind). They certainly seem to have a double-standard about road-behaviour by motorists vs cyclists. I personally feel more confident in seeing this as being about that rather than race, but it could be both.

Avatar
nicmason replied to FluffyKittenofTindalos | 4 years ago
1 like
FluffyKittenofTindalos]
</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>[quote=nicmason

wrote:
Roubaixcobbles wrote:
nicmason wrote:

[ Edit - having looked back at previous posts, I don't agree with nicmason's attitude.

 

I'm curious. Which bit of my "attitude"

"Attitude" was the wrong word - should have said "comments". But the word was in my mind because posters keep using it about this cyclist, and it does have a certain racial implication in the way it gets used. But I disagree with: Your focus exclusively on a minor side-issue. That you leapt in to take issue with a poster who was expressing an understandable irritation at the double-standards employed by the police. Regardless of whether I would say the same thing, or entirely agree, I get why they might feel that way. That you _seem_ to have the view that one should obey the police because they are always right - when I'd say I would mainly obey them simply because they have power, so personally I wouldn't want to take the risk of not doing so. I prefer a quiet life, me. Both from a few personal experiences and those of people I know, and from numerous news stories, it seems to me they are quite often wrong, both about the law and about the safe thing to do (Hillsborough comes to mind). They certainly seem to have a double-standard about road-behaviour by motorists vs cyclists. I personally feel more confident in seeing this as being about that rather than race, but it could be both.

 

Thanks for that.

My "original " point was that if you are stopped over the white line and a police officer asks you to move back that doesn't mean you are right and they are wrong because you are in a "safe" space.  You have a choice to do move or pick an argument and that may not go well.  I have been spoken to for exactly this thing. So I don't have view that you should always obey the police but I do accept that if I argue it probbaly won't go well.  

 

Avatar
roubaixcobbles replied to nicmason | 4 years ago
4 likes
nicmason wrote:

 

My "original " point was that if you are stopped over the white line and a police officer asks you to move back that doesn't mean you are right and they are wrong because you are in a "safe" space.  You have a choice to do move or pick an argument and that may not go well.  I have been spoken to for exactly this thing. So I don't have view that you should always obey the police but I do accept that if I argue it probbaly won't go well.  

 

 

And were you (and I'm going to take a wild guess that you are distinctly caucasian?) accused of smelling of marijuana and pulled off your bike for a public body search? No?  Fancy that, now!

 

Avatar
brooksby replied to roubaixcobbles | 4 years ago
3 likes
Roubaixcobbles wrote:
nicmason wrote:

 

My "original " point was that if you are stopped over the white line and a police officer asks you to move back that doesn't mean you are right and they are wrong because you are in a "safe" space.  You have a choice to do move or pick an argument and that may not go well.  I have been spoken to for exactly this thing. So I don't have view that you should always obey the police but I do accept that if I argue it probbaly won't go well.  

 

 

 

And were you (and I'm going to take a wild guess that you are distinctly caucasian?) accused of smelling of marijuana and pulled off your bike for a public body search? No?  Fancy that, now!

 

Remember how in this case the smell of marijuana mysteriously disappeared after the police had made their point, too. Coincidence, of course.

Avatar
Sriracha replied to roubaixcobbles | 4 years ago
0 likes
Roubaixcobbles wrote:
nicmason wrote:
Roubaixcobbles wrote:
nicmason wrote:
Peowpeowpeowlasers wrote:

Did the officer witness him crossing the STOP line while the light was red?  If not then he has no right to insist that he move.

For all he knew, the guy might have crossed it while still green, saw the junction was blocked and decided to wait.

I would have stayed right where I was.  Fuck the law on this point, it's stupid.  No way would I sit in a HGV's blind spot.

 

Ok so if it was green but the junction was blocked he shouldnt have gone and the policeman does have right to ask him to move . Or stop being part of the traffic get off the bike and get on the pavement.

Does the policeman also have the right to then make a clearly false allegation that the cyclist smells of marijuana and subject him to a humiliating public body search? Think you're kind of missing the main point here...

 

I'm not commenting on the main point.

Several people have commented that if the police told them to move they wouldn't do it. Maybe they'd close their eyes so they where invisible as well.

Why aren't you commenting on the main point?  Why when the article and video show an egregious example of police racism and exceeding their reasonable powers are you focussing on whether someone's wheel was two feet over the stop line? What's more important here, and why are you insisting on distracting from the obvious and worrying abuse of power against a black man by police by nitpicking about minor traffic regs? What's your motivation?

How do you know it was racist?

Avatar
vonhelmet replied to Sriracha | 4 years ago
2 likes
Sriracha wrote:
Roubaixcobbles wrote:
nicmason wrote:
Roubaixcobbles wrote:
nicmason wrote:
Peowpeowpeowlasers wrote:

Did the officer witness him crossing the STOP line while the light was red?  If not then he has no right to insist that he move.

For all he knew, the guy might have crossed it while still green, saw the junction was blocked and decided to wait.

I would have stayed right where I was.  Fuck the law on this point, it's stupid.  No way would I sit in a HGV's blind spot.

 

Ok so if it was green but the junction was blocked he shouldnt have gone and the policeman does have right to ask him to move . Or stop being part of the traffic get off the bike and get on the pavement.

Does the policeman also have the right to then make a clearly false allegation that the cyclist smells of marijuana and subject him to a humiliating public body search? Think you're kind of missing the main point here...

 

I'm not commenting on the main point.

Several people have commented that if the police told them to move they wouldn't do it. Maybe they'd close their eyes so they where invisible as well.

Why aren't you commenting on the main point?  Why when the article and video show an egregious example of police racism and exceeding their reasonable powers are you focussing on whether someone's wheel was two feet over the stop line? What's more important here, and why are you insisting on distracting from the obvious and worrying abuse of power against a black man by police by nitpicking about minor traffic regs? What's your motivation?

How do you know it was racist?

Have you been paying attention? Stop and search is used disproportionately against ethnic minorities without any commensurate level of "finding" following the searches.

Avatar
Sriracha replied to vonhelmet | 4 years ago
1 like
vonhelmet wrote:
Sriracha wrote:
Roubaixcobbles wrote:
nicmason wrote:
Roubaixcobbles wrote:
nicmason wrote:
Peowpeowpeowlasers wrote:

Did the officer witness him crossing the STOP line while the light was red?  If not then he has no right to insist that he move.

For all he knew, the guy might have crossed it while still green, saw the junction was blocked and decided to wait.

I would have stayed right where I was.  Fuck the law on this point, it's stupid.  No way would I sit in a HGV's blind spot.

 

Ok so if it was green but the junction was blocked he shouldnt have gone and the policeman does have right to ask him to move . Or stop being part of the traffic get off the bike and get on the pavement.

Does the policeman also have the right to then make a clearly false allegation that the cyclist smells of marijuana and subject him to a humiliating public body search? Think you're kind of missing the main point here...

 

I'm not commenting on the main point.

Several people have commented that if the police told them to move they wouldn't do it. Maybe they'd close their eyes so they where invisible as well.

Why aren't you commenting on the main point?  Why when the article and video show an egregious example of police racism and exceeding their reasonable powers are you focussing on whether someone's wheel was two feet over the stop line? What's more important here, and why are you insisting on distracting from the obvious and worrying abuse of power against a black man by police by nitpicking about minor traffic regs? What's your motivation?

How do you know it was racist?

Have you been paying attention? Stop and search is used disproportionately against ethnic minorities without any commensurate level of "finding" following the searches.

So from that you conclude that this instance was racist? Maybe it was. But on the evidence of a single episode, unless we can see into the motivations of the officer, there is no way to tell. You can not just say that because the guy is black therefore this negative interaction is racially motivated. Are all interactions across races predicated on colour, or just the negative ones? It becomes pure confirmation bias at that point; the guy is black, ergo racism - I see it every day. Maybe the officer just made a bad call, not ideal, but hey.

Avatar
srchar | 4 years ago
7 likes

Are we sure that copper was the real deal? He looks like he's come straight from a very boozy fancy dress party.

I've also been told by a Met copper to move back behind the stop line at traffic lights without a ASL.  When I refused, I was told to move onto the pavement and given a sanctimonious lecture about how dangerous the roads would be if everyone ignored traffic lights, and threatened with a fine. I bit my tongue.

Kudos to the guy in the video for remaining polite and good-humoured in the face of such a prat.

Avatar
Kendalred replied to srchar | 4 years ago
10 likes
srchar wrote:

Are we sure that copper was the real deal? He looks like he's come straight from a very boozy fancy dress party.

I've also been told by a Met copper to move back behind the stop line at traffic lights without a ASL.  When I refused, I was told to move onto the pavement and given a sanctimonious lecture about how dangerous the roads would be if everyone ignored traffic lights, and threatened with a fine. I bit my tongue.

Kudos to the guy in the video for remaining polite and good-humoured in the face of such a prat.

Having not lived in London for some time, I presume these days the police will routinely tell motorists to reverse back behind an ASL when they encroach into it?

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Kendalred | 4 years ago
2 likes
Kendalred wrote:
srchar wrote:

Are we sure that copper was the real deal? He looks like he's come straight from a very boozy fancy dress party.

I've also been told by a Met copper to move back behind the stop line at traffic lights without a ASL.  When I refused, I was told to move onto the pavement and given a sanctimonious lecture about how dangerous the roads would be if everyone ignored traffic lights, and threatened with a fine. I bit my tongue.

Kudos to the guy in the video for remaining polite and good-humoured in the face of such a prat.

Having not lived in London for some time, I presume these days the police will routinely tell motorists to reverse back behind an ASL when they encroach into it?

Black or white motorist?

Avatar
nicmason replied to srchar | 4 years ago
0 likes
srchar wrote:

Are we sure that copper was the real deal? He looks like he's come straight from a very boozy fancy dress party.

I've also been told by a Met copper to move back behind the stop line at traffic lights without a ASL.  When I refused, I was told to move onto the pavement and given a sanctimonious lecture about how dangerous the roads would be if everyone ignored traffic lights, and threatened with a fine. I bit my tongue.

Kudos to the guy in the video for remaining polite and good-humoured in the face of such a prat.

 

Why didn't you just move back ? Technically he's (or she's) right and you are wrong.  Maybe you should be thankful they didn't decide to give you a fixed penalty notice .

 

 

Avatar
ChrisB200SX replied to nicmason | 4 years ago
3 likes
nicmason wrote:
srchar wrote:

Are we sure that copper was the real deal? He looks like he's come straight from a very boozy fancy dress party.

I've also been told by a Met copper to move back behind the stop line at traffic lights without a ASL.  When I refused, I was told to move onto the pavement and given a sanctimonious lecture about how dangerous the roads would be if everyone ignored traffic lights, and threatened with a fine. I bit my tongue.

Kudos to the guy in the video for remaining polite and good-humoured in the face of such a prat.

Why didn't you just move back ? Technically he's (or she's) right and you are wrong.  Maybe you should be thankful they didn't decide to give you a fixed penalty notice .

Because it's obviously far better to be wrong but not under the wheels of a truck?

Avatar
Hirsute replied to ChrisB200SX | 4 years ago
3 likes
ChrisB200SX wrote:

Because it's obviously far better to be wrong but not under the wheels of a truck?

Certainly a variation on the usual 'no point being right if you are dead' position.

Avatar
srchar replied to nicmason | 4 years ago
2 likes
nicmason wrote:

Why didn't you just move back ? Technically he's (or she's) right and you are wrong.  Maybe you should be thankful they didn't decide to give you a fixed penalty notice .

Because I'd have had to position myself either between the kerb and car turning left, or between two cars, neither of which is a safe position. It's not possible to know whether there's a bike's length between a car's front bumper and the stop line until you've filtered to the front of the queue. Perhaps I should have just joined the back of the queue.

Technically, you can be tried for treason if you affix a postage stamp to a letter upside-down.

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to srchar | 4 years ago
6 likes
srchar wrote:

Are we sure that copper was the real deal? He looks like he's come straight from a very boozy fancy dress party.

Just from the still picture above, I was wondering if it was some sort of Harry Hill tribute act.

Avatar
Legin | 4 years ago
0 likes
Avatar
iandusud | 4 years ago
5 likes

This is an apauling abuse of power and I feel for the victim. I have to add that I have a huge respect for the Police as they have a very difficult job to do and I wouldn't like to do it. However this sort of behaviour does them no fovors at all. I really think this should be escalated. 

Avatar
Muddy Ford | 4 years ago
3 likes

Looks to me the officer couldnt wait to touch the cyclist, he went straight for the crotch before he was even finished taking the overshoes off. I wonder if there has always been a subtext for his ambition to get a uniform on and have the ability to abuse police powers. Kudos to the cyclist for keeping cool, a better person than me.

Avatar
EK Spinner | 4 years ago
0 likes

Patting him down, we can all see he is hiding nothing  1 

Avatar
vonhelmet | 4 years ago
3 likes

Constable Savage, was it?

Avatar
Hirsute replied to vonhelmet | 4 years ago
3 likes
vonhelmet wrote:

Constable Savage, was it?

Can't say I noticed sir.

Avatar
adamrice | 4 years ago
5 likes

I don't know about the UK, but in the USA, I get the impression that police are trained on day one to say that they smell pot immediately after initiating a traffic stop, as a way to establish probable cause for a search.

Avatar
Legin | 4 years ago
5 likes

There is another picture of him here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reg_Varney

Avatar
brooksby replied to Legin | 4 years ago
0 likes
Legin wrote:

There is another picture of him here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reg_Varney

TBH when i saw the picture i wondered if the policemans name was Herrick... (I note the video isnt exactly in bright sunlight, hmm?)

Avatar
Huw Watkins | 4 years ago
10 likes

Agree with all of the above.

And what a mess the officer looked too.  Looked like he'd come straight out of the pub.

Avatar
burtthebike | 4 years ago
10 likes

Riding a bike and black, he's lucky to have escaped being arrested.  Clearly the officer didn't like having his authority challenged in front of his mates, so decided to make Mani pay for it.  Must be difficult having such a fragile ego when you're a policeman.

Avatar
BIGWATTS | 4 years ago
8 likes

I'm reading this after watching the video of Ebenezer Azamati, and am feeling sick of the institutional racism in this country.  Props to Mani and the guys with him for keeping their cool.

Pages

Latest Comments