The notorious must get in front (MGIF) overtake is one well-known to anyone who's ridden a bike on the road for even a short length of time. We're talking about the overtake from another road user displaying a level of impatience that'll make you laugh, cry, or just give a worn-down shake of your head, apathetic at its frequency.
The MGIF overtake is normally accompanied by the road user responsible sitting at a traffic light or road junction just seconds later while the cyclist freewheels up behind, begging the question — why? Why bother? Why bother rushing an overtake only to 'save' a couple of seconds? I say 'save' in quotes because much of the time you'll end up at the exact same spot, at the exact same time as you would have done without the impatient overtake.
There's the context you probably already knew if you're a regular here. A MGIF overtake will often be accompanied by the inevitable aborted pass when the perpetrator realises they can't actually pull it off safely. Ahem...
This video from Cycling in Kilkenny, a "person that walks, drives, cycles a bike and runs very long distances", was accompanied with a post questioning the logic of such manoeuvres.
"The obsession with Must Get In Front is just bizarre," they said. "This person started an overtake on a speed bump and then had to abandon it because. 1. They didn't pay attention to how long the cargo bike is 2. They didn't pay attention to the bikes width 3. I was indicating to turn right."
Elsewhere in Ireland...
Another live blog classic of the genre...
> "The must get in front is just irresistible": Cyclist overtaken by driver who gets to sit in traffic two seconds sooner
A 2020 study from the United States found that cyclists don't hold up drivers. Researchers from Portland State University’s Transportation, Technology & People Laboratory sought to look into the idea that motorists believe cyclists riding on the road hold them up, but found that: "Bicycles are not likely to lead to reduced passenger car travel speed", and "In most cases, the differences in speed were not significant from a practical standpoint."
The study was carried out on six streets in Portland, Oregon, and involved two scenarios – the first where a cyclist rode in front of a passenger car, the second where it was another car in front of a car. While "a few statistically significant differences" between those two scenarios were identified, "the actual speed differences were generally in the order of one mph or less".
Waiting a few seconds might just be that, a few seconds, and anyway... it'll save you looking like a wally sat waiting at the next red light when the road user rolls up next to you...
Preaching to the choir and all that, I know, anyone got any ideas of how to spread the MGIF gospel?
Add new comment
33 comments
Q: What's the difference between an airliner and a London drivist?
A: With an airliner the whining noise stops when they turn the engine off.
Unrealistic, there's a cyclist riding in the rain...
From the MK News Desk:
https://www.miltonkeynes.co.uk/news/is-it-a-bird-is-it-a-plane-no-its-13...
"Shoppers stopped to cheer and wave as residents, MK’s deputy mayor and senior councillors cycled through the city ". That'll be a first!
Anyway next year there's supposed to be some cycling Santa world record attempt so I might have to get involved
Pages