Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Cycle lane + hi-vis = Driver ploughing into cyclist on roundabout (+ more social media victim blaming); Cyclists praise Deputy Lord Mayor for parking bike in ‘car’ space – but critics slam “wasted space”; Highway Code on GB News + more on the live blog

It’s the 108th Tuesday of January (and thankfully, the last), and Ryan Mallon is back with more cycling news and views on the live blog

SUMMARY

No Live Blog item found.

30 January 2024, 09:06
Cyclist struck by motorist on roundabout (Credit Warwickshire Cyclist, Twitter)
Cycle lane + hi-vis = Driver ploughing into cyclist on roundabout (and motorists blaming the cyclist on social media)

Here at the road.cc HQ, by now you would think we’d be used to the extreme lengths motorists on social media will go to defend their fellow drivers and pin the blame for any and all road collisions on cyclists.

Last month on the live blog we covered the head scratching reaction to footage released by West Midlands Police, which showed the moment a 71-year-old cyclist was left with a bleed on the brain, a broken shoulder, and a broken ankle after a driver ignored give way markings and ploughed on into her.

Despite the motorist being jailed for 12 months after pleading guilty to causing serious injury by careless driving, anti-cycling Twitter on the other hand was convinced that it was the cyclist who was “irresponsible” and “shouldn’t have been going that fast”, and that they were “probably breaking the speed limit but clearly not proceeding towards a major crossing with caution”.

Coventry crash May 2023 (via West Midlands Police)

>  “I love it when drivers harass me for breaking rules they made up in their head”: Motorist tells cyclist he’ll “get a ticket for being in the bus lane”… while driving an untaxed car

Last February, drivers on social media reacted to the infamous crash on a Sheffield roundabout which left broadcaster and bike helmet advocate Dan Walker feeling “glad to be alive” by accusing the Channel 5 presenter of “putting himself in danger” by “ignoring” a nearby cycle lane – described by local cyclists as “filled with broken glass”.

And over the past weekend, a clip of a Belfast driver pulling across three lanes of rush hour traffic, hitting a cyclist in the process, even led some buck eejits on social media to boldly pronounce that the female commuter had deliberately pulled into the path of the motorist to cause the crash. As you do.

> “Looks like the cyclist deliberately made contact with the car”: Driver pulls across three lanes and hits cyclist – and motorists claim cyclist was at fault

So, it’s safe to say that it takes a lot to shock us when it comes to the ever-expanding genre of anti-cycling, pro-terrible driving social media excuses.

But the baffling response to this latest clip – posted yesterday by the Warwickshire Cyclist account – even managed to raise a few eyebrows in the road.cc offices.

For a start, let’s check to see if the cyclist was abiding by the holy ‘Fuming Motorist’s Arbitrary Code of Conduct for People on Bikes’.

Were they wearing hi-vis? Yes, indeed. A helmet? Check. Riding in the cycle lane? Yep.

But despite the cyclist abiding by these fundamental road safety commandments (at least in the eyes of victim blamers and more than a few police forces), the oblivious motorist still managed to pull out onto the roundabout and clip them.

> Near Miss of the Day 838: "Tell me again about hi-vis and lights!" — Cyclist narrowly avoids collision at mini roundabout

And the response on the social media platform formerly known as Twitter? Just as you’d expect, of course.

“Cyclists fault he should of been peddling faster,” said the grammatically-challenged Danny, whose understanding of road safety is right up there with his spelling and punctuation (what, too harsh?).

“I’m a cyclist... but he’s at fault here,” added FSD Bera Test Pilot, helpfully fulfilling our quota of ‘I’m a cyclist but…’ comments.

“Why was Paul the Peddler in the middle of a road for cars?” asked Andrew, failing to notice the red bike lane on the roundabout.

“Terrible cycling,” wrote Jean. “Never hug the edge in a roundabout. I believe the cyclist was in the driver’s blind spot. He didn’t yield properly, but it doesn’t help the cyclist...”

“He was riding in the red marked Cycle Lane FFS,” replied an understandably exasperated Warwickshire Cyclist, who later posted their own recommended alternative to hi-vis clothing, which they reckon would easily grab a careless driver’s attention:

I’ll just leave that there…

30 January 2024, 09:59
Deputy Lord Mayor of Cork parks bike in car space (Dan Boyle, Twitter)
“Symbol of road space wasted by cyclists” or a demonstration of “how much space a commuter actually needs”? Cyclists praise Deputy Lord Mayor for parking bike in designated ‘car’ space – but critics say it’s “celebrating wasted space”

So, what happens when you’re a cyclist, who rides their bike into work every day, and suddenly – just because you’re now the city’s Deputy Lord Mayor – the powers that be decide to bestow upon you a somewhat unnecessarily large parking space?

You just park your bike in it, don’t you?

Well, that’s exactly what Colette Finn, a Green Party councillor and the current Deputy Lord Mayor of Cork, has chosen to do, as evidenced by this rather striking image – posted on Twitter by fellow Green councillor Dan Boyle – neatly depicting the vast chasm in space routinely provided for some commuters over others.

While several cyclists praised Finn’s decision to park her bike in her designated Deputy Lord Mayor’s spot, with different variations on “Love it” peppering the replies, the image did however strike up a rather heated debate (it is social media after all) on the use of so-called ‘car’ parking spaces for bikes – and whether designated parking spaces for officials should even still be the norm if we want to encourage active travel.

“Celebrating wasted space. Hilarious,” said Aodhán, while Orchard Man also described Finn’s bike parking as a “symbol of ‘road’ space wasted by cyclists”.

“If the space isn’t needed for cars, put in a bike rack,” he continued.

“Selfish though. Bet that same person will whine about a car taking up space on a cycle path,” added Nick, as if those two examples are directly comparable.

Meanwhile, Colum wrote: “I suppose it’s political humour but it’s wasteful. She could have requested removal of the sign.”

Others, naturally, were baffled by the backlash to a cyclist parking their bike in a reserved space for an elected official in an underground car park…

“People saying it’s a waste of space but no one can park in it but her so who cares if her bike is in it. That’s fine!” said greekman.

Meanwhile, when it comes to the issue of ‘wasted space’, some cyclists noted that another culprit could perhaps be responsible for taking up too much unnecessary room.

“I know, crazy how many bikes you can fit in the space of a car, isn't it?” wrote Tim. “Crazy waste of space, five empty seats and two tonnes of metal just to move somebody around when clearly this is all most of us need.”

“This makes you think how much space a commuter actually needs if we would be more conscious,” said the Cork Cycling Campaign.

Con, however, noted that the very concept of ‘privileged’ car parking was detrimental to the cause of active travel.

“As long as we dole out privileged parking places to an entitled few, we are never gonna see progress on the use of public transport or alternative transportation like cycling,” he said.

“The few isn’t the issue, it's a wider issue with council and civil service staff too,” added Cycling in Kilkenny. “How much will an entire council staff care about public transport if they get free parking?”

30 January 2024, 11:22
GB News Highway Code debate January 2024
Highway Code changes “passed me by”, says Eamonn Holmes – as GB News presenter calls for “regular” retests in shockingly balanced debate

Alright, don’t panic, but I think there’s been a glitch in the matrix somewhere near the GB News studios…

Because, after yesterday’s “concerning” report that more than half of motorists surveyed by the RAC are still unsure whether the Highway Code changes have made the roads safer for vulnerable road users, two years on from their implementation, this morning GB News decided to hold a debate on the changes and their effect on cyclists – and, rather shockingly, it was a pretty balanced affair.

> More Highway Code news: RAC research suggests half of drivers still unsure if Highway Code changes have made roads any safer for pedestrians

At the start of the segment, which in classic GB News style pitted cycling instructor and director of FlightFreeUK Anna Hughes and motorising journalist Danny Kelly against each other, presenter Eamonn Holmes (who has firmly enhanced his controversialist credentials in recent years) chose to flip things completely on their head by asserting that “I think the Highway Code is a good thing”.

“I just don’t think any of us pay any attention to it,” Ruth’s husband continued. “We should all be tested on it quite regularly, we should have revision courses.”

I have to admit, Eamonn Holmes calling for Highway Code revision courses – and, even, later in the segment bringing up the possibility of mandatory driving retests – wasn’t on my January 2024 bingo card.

Highway Code changes (Tier press release)

Even Danny Kelly admitted that he hasn’t adhered to the new guidelines on giving way to vulnerable road users on side roads – a problem shared by 25 per cent of drivers, according to the RAC’s survey – and said the Highway Code changes should have been publicised more widely through a leafleting campaign sent to all UK driving licence holders.

And, by the end, the presenters were highlighting the dangers posed on the roads to cyclists, Hughes and Kelly were agreeing that the ‘war’ on motorists was preposterous, and they all concurred that cycling, you know, wasn’t all bad.

I bet Darren Grimes is fuming…

30 January 2024, 16:53
The greatest bike chase scene of all time?

This week 20 years ago, Garth Marenghi’s Darkplace premiered on Channel 4 (well, if you don’t count its original 1980s release in Peru that is).

So, what better way to celebrate such a landmark moment in British televisual culture than by enjoying perhaps the greatest cycling-themed chase scene in history?

Have a good evening, folks!

30 January 2024, 16:19
Highway Code changes (Tier press release)
“My fork-lift licence required a refresh every three years or I could not do my job. My driving licence does not”: road.cc reader on the public’s (lack of) awareness of the Highway Code changes

Following Eamonn Holmes’ confession this morning that the Highway Code changes passed him by, along with the GB News presenter’s rather surprising suggestion that motorists should be subject to occasional retests, a road.cc reader (and relative newcomer to cycling) got in touch to share their views on how we can ensure that all drivers are made aware of any future changes to the Highway Code:

I read with interest an article on your site about the lack of awareness about the recent (ok, well not so recent, but also not well advertised and definitely not well adopted) changes to the Highway Code that were published two years ago, that focused on changes to make our roads safer for the most vulnerable users.

I am a newish cycler and long-time car driver in my 50s, and while I do see plenty of instances of good road safety by (the majority) of drivers while out on my bike, I also see far too much dangerous behaviour, especially by older (middle age) drivers in so called SUV and high powered vehicles and ‘professional’ drivers whose road space entitlement seriously outweighs the narrowness of their safety margins for the pedestrians and cyclists that share their (I deliberately put ‘their’ instead of ‘our’) roads with them.

I have been driving for 30 years and not once have I been required to take a licence refresher or been tested on ANY of my knowledge of the Highway Code since I passed my test. Surely there must be drivers with 40 or 50 year gaps between passing their test and yet there is still no further requirement to demonstrate how changes to safety on ever more congested roads applies to them.

My fork lift licence required a refresh every 3 years or I could not do my job. My driving licence does not.

Recently I had to update my driving licence because it was nearly 10 years old. Surely, as a condition of a new licence being issued, can’t the Minister in charge of transport add a simple on-line test to the application process, where a driver MUST be made aware of AND demonstrate knowledge of any new changes to the Highway Code?

As well as highlighting the new safety directives, it will make prosecution of bad drivers easier when drivers fail to put the new rules into action if they have to show they know the rules.

This way, eventually ALL drivers will be compelled to be aware of existing and future changes to the Highway Code, at not much cost to the Government, and we all benefit.

I do believe that as a car driver and as a cyclist that I am much more aware of the dangers that I encounter as a cyclist, that I was pretty complacent about when I was only driving.

30 January 2024, 15:28
Speaking of the joys of time trialling…

I think it’s fair to say young Ferney Molina left everything on the road on the way to coming fifth at the U23 Colombian national time trial championships:

Go get that lad a McDonald’s!

30 January 2024, 14:59
Campagnolo makes Bora Ultra WTO and Bora WTO road wheelsets “lighter” and “more aerodynamic”

Campagnolo has revamped its Bora wheelset range, updating both the Ultra WTO and WTO road bike wheels. The iconic Italian brand claims that they are lighter and more aerodynamic than their predecessors and like many modern wheels now feature a wider internal rim width. However, one thing that hasn’t benefited from some weight reduction is the price tag – prices for the range start at a rather hefty £2,200 a pair. Ouch.

2024 Campagnolo Bora Ultra WTO riding shot

Read more: > Campagnolo makes Bora Ultra WTO and Bora WTO road wheelsets “lighter” and “more aerodynamic”

30 January 2024, 14:25
2023 Strade Bianche Pidcock  - 3.jpeg
Now can we start calling it the sixth monument? 2024 Strade Bianche set to feature more kilometres and more gravel sectors

Strade Bianche’s long-held claim to be professional cycling’s sixth monument kicked up a gear today in Siena, where the race organisers revealed that this year’s edition of the Tuscan classic is set to feature more kilometres and more white gravel roads than ever before.

The men’s race, won last year by Tom Pidcock, is set to be extended by over 30km, rising from an 184km-long test with 11 gravel sectors to a 215km one with a whopping 15 sections of gruelling, ever-changing white roads.

The increased distance of the men’s Strade Bianche has now brought it considerably closer, in terms of length at least, to cycling’s five most prestigious one-day classics, which tend to range between 240km and 260km (the shortest of the monuments, Il Lombardia, clocked in at 238km last autumn).

2020 Strade Bianche (Cor Vos)

(SWPix/Cor Vos)

Of course, Strade Bianche has long been touted as the number one contender to the ‘sixth monument’ crown, with only its shorter distance – equating, roughly, to two hours of racing – holding it back in terms of prestige. This year’s revamped route should go some way to closing the gulf to the big five, and amplifying the by-now annual clamour for it to be given a title that, in reality, holds little significance except in the minds of cycling obsessives.

Meanwhile, the women’s race – won in epic fashion in Siena by Demi Vollering over her SD Worx teammate Lotte Kopecky – will increase by one solitary kilometre to 137km, but also feature four more gravel sectors, bringing the total to 12.

Both races’ additional gravel kilometres stem from the inclusion of an extra lap before the run-in to Siena and its mythical final climb, with the often decisive climbs of Colle Pinzuto and Le Tolfe now set to be tackled twice.

30 January 2024, 13:59
MPs call for urgent changes for victims of road violence

MPs from across parliament came together today to call for urgent changes for the victims of road violence, telling a Westminster Hall debate about harrowing cases of road violence from across the United Kingdom and urging action such as compulsory re-testing for disqualified driving, ensuring that exceptional hardship truly is exceptional, thorough investigation of major collisions, escalating penalties for repeat offences, and more.

Newmarket Road fatal collision sign, Norwich (credit: Peter Silburn)

Read more: > MPs call for urgent changes for victims of road violence

30 January 2024, 13:25
Young Dutch sprinter Casper van Auden pips Dylan Groenewegen and Tim Merlier on first stage of the AlUla Tour

Late January and early February mean only one thing in the cycling world – lunchtime sprint finishes!

And after a few weeks battling sleep to catch even a glimpse of the racing down under, must-watch-live viewers will be pleased to learn that the peloton has migrated to the Middle East, for some much more civilised stage finish times (apologies, Aussie cycling fans, I appreciate you have to put up with it all year round).

On today’s opening stage of the five-day race formerly known as the Saudi Tour, DSM-Firmenich PostNL’s promising young Dutch sprinter Casper van Auden surprised the big guns, as the 22-year-old launched early and held off the vastly more experienced Dylan Groenewegen and Tim Merlier for arguably the biggest win of his career.

Van Auden has shown his promise in fast finishes before, of course, taking wins at the Tour de Normandie, and coming close at both the Tour of Britain and Milano-Torino last year, but he’s certainly started his 2024 season with one or two prestigious scalps on the first day of the AlUla Tour.

Take a note of the name.

30 January 2024, 12:58
National time trial road bike Tamsin Miller - CTT
“If you have a bike, you can ride a time trial!” Road bike participation in time trials up 42 per cent, after TT governing body introduced new category last year

Cycling Time Trials’ decision to introduce a separate category for standard road bikes at all of its events last year appears to have paid dividends, as the governing body announced this week that road bike participation in TTs has risen by more than half, proving – according to CTT’s chairperson – that “if you have a bike, you can ride a time trial”.

Last April, in a bid to encourage more people to race solo against the clock, the governing body for time trials in England, Wales, and Scotland created a distinct road bike category, which meant riders without the fancy tech and aero bars could simply click the road bike option when entering a CTT-sanctioned event, with post-ride results listed and scored separately from those on TT bikes.

> Road bike category introduced by British time trial governing body to "get more people time trialling"

And according to CTT, which today announced its dates and courses for the 2024 season, the move has worked a treat, boosting road bike numbers by 42 per cent, with 83 per cent of the time trialling newbies trying out British cycling’s holiest of disciplines for the first time last year doing so on dropped bars.

“While I’m excited to see how the elite riders perform in this superb 2024 calendar, I’m also proud that time trialling is once again becoming a sport for everyone,” CTT’s chair Andrea Parish said today.

“Our data shows that road bike participation is up 42 per cent compared with last year and that 83  per cent of riders new to time trialling entered the road bike category exclusively.

“For me it’s essential that our sport doesn’t put up barriers. If you have a bike, you can ride a time trial!”

30 January 2024, 12:24
2023 Men's Ryedale Grasscrete Grand Prix (Craig Zadoroznyj/SWpix.com)
British Cycling’s elite road racing task force shares recommendations for “reinvigorating” flagging domestic scene

British Cycling’s elite road racing task force, set up last August to support the governing body as it attempts to “innovate and energise” local racing in Britain, has shared a list of 16 recommendations which it hopes will breathe new life into a flagging domestic scene suffering from setback after setback in recent years.

Chaired by Ed Clancy, the task force engaged with more than 250 people across the sport in the UK to consider the composition of the elite national calendar, the challenges facing the rapidly dwindling number of domestic teams, and opportunities to grow the reach and profile of local races.

Its 16 recommendations to the governing body – which aim to help create a varied, competitive, and sustainable National Road Series, a National Circuit Series tailored for mass audiences, and ensure that Britain retains its WorldTour stage races following the recent demise of Tour of Britain and Women’s Tour organisers SweetSpot – are as follows:

Explore the creation of a centralised procurement function.

Produce a new branding, marketing and communications framework.

Undertake a full review of the digital strategy.

Develop event organiser succession plans for all national series events.

Develop a ‘Winning Pattern’ playbook based on existing successful races.

Consider a targeted sponsorship agreement for the National Series.

Review rider entry processes to stimulate early entries.

Develop best practice guidance for teams.

Undertake a full review of the National Circuit Series.

Prioritise National Circuit Series locations by audience size.

Review the entry criteria for WorldTour riders to enter the National Circuit Series.

Review the national road calendar and ensure more races are outside of the north of England.

All efforts should be made to ensure delivery of the Tour of Britain and a UCI Women’s World Tour stage race in 2024.

Explore opportunities to increase the number of UCI 1.2 and 2.2 races.

Undertake a full review of race distances and rider qualification criteria.

Consider a new range of jerseys for the National Road Series and a capped maximum entry cost.

“It’s been a real privilege to lead the Elite Road Racing Task Force through this process and I hope that the recommendations published today can help to galvanise the community and help domestic road racing to grow and flourish in the future,” Olympic champion pursuiter Clancy said in a statement yesterday.

“While the task force members have done a huge amount of work, our recommendations belong to the whole community. We’re hugely thankful to everybody who took time to engage with us through the process, and their experience and insight was vital in enabling us to paint a true picture of the current opportunities and challenges they see.

“Though this now concludes our work, the task force will continue to be a critical and supportive friend as British Cycling moves into its implementation phase, and we look forward to seeing the plans take shape.”

> How do we save UK bike racing? SweetSpot's PR Director on Women's Tour cancellation and staying positive for the future

Responding to the task force’s recommendations, British Cycling CEO Jon Dutton said: “I’d like to thank Ed and the task force members for their commitment to the process over the past four months as we collectively look to tackle a matter of real importance for our sport and our membership.

“While it is clear from the report that there are no easy answers, we have taken positive steps with our 2024 elite road calendar, and now have a clear long-term roadmap to propel our national level events towards sustainable growth in the future.

“This has been a new way of working for British Cycling, which demonstrates our commitment to openness and collaboration with our communities, and to finding solutions to our most pressing challenges. We look forward to sharing our progress over the months and years ahead.”

30 January 2024, 11:59
Bring me my arrows of desire, being me my spear (but just not next to the cycle lane, okay?)
30 January 2024, 10:58
Yet another example of why hi-vis clothing may not be a panacea for cyclists’ road safety, after all

Cue the obligatory ‘but, but cyclists’ comments... 

After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

83 comments

Avatar
brooksby replied to hawkinspeter | 9 months ago
5 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

Also, there's plenty of people that suffer from bladder issues or even just old age that can struggle to find appropriate facilities in time. To my mind, free toilets and free drinking water (both 24h) should be a minimum of civilisation.

One of the people who are mentioned in the Grauniad story did suffer from bladder issues.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to brooksby | 9 months ago
3 likes

brooksby wrote:

hawkinspeter wrote:

Also, there's plenty of people that suffer from bladder issues or even just old age that can struggle to find appropriate facilities in time. To my mind, free toilets and free drinking water (both 24h) should be a minimum of civilisation.

One of the people who are mentioned in the Grauniad story did suffer from bladder issues.

In my defence, I hadn't read the Gurandia story

Avatar
bianchi51 replied to hawkinspeter | 9 months ago
2 likes

You're absolutely right on the free toilet issue. I live in Australia, the land of the free public loo, but I visit the UK fairly often and if there's one thing that really annoys me to the point of incandescant rage, it's having to pay to pee. (What's even worse is the lack of consistency in prices.)  There are some services that local authorities should expect to provide without charge to the user in the interests of good hygiene, if nothing else. Free potable water is also a reasonable expectation.

 

Avatar
stonojnr replied to Steve K | 9 months ago
0 likes

I think he's wrong, legally speaking anyway, wild peeing as it's called, is a criminal offence under the public order act, so it's irrelevant if its littering or not.

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to stonojnr | 9 months ago
4 likes

stonojnr wrote:

I think he's wrong, legally speaking anyway, wild peeing as it's called, is a criminal offence under the public order act, so it's irrelevant if its littering or not.

this is a possibility, but if the act is carried out in a discreet way I do not believe it is a public order offence.

if you start waving your bits around, then it probably will be.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to wycombewheeler | 9 months ago
2 likes

wycombewheeler wrote:

this is a possibility, but if the act is carried out in a discreet way I do not believe it is a public order offence.

if you start waving your bits around, then it probably will be.

However, waving your bits around, as long as it's not in a sexual manner or to cause offence (i.e. public nudity) is not illegal.

Avatar
mattw replied to hawkinspeter | 9 months ago
1 like

Wasn't he the other side of a tree from the road?

Perhaps it was a very heavy tree, that bent light so the voyeur-official could watch.

Waving your bits around may be punished more heavily in Scotland.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to mattw | 9 months ago
1 like
mattw wrote:

Wasn't he the other side of a tree from the road?

Perhaps it was a very heavy tree, that bent light so the voyeur-official could watch.

Waving your bits around may be punished more heavily in Scotland.

I thought that traditional wearing of Scottish kilts encouraged the waving around of bits

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to hawkinspeter | 9 months ago
1 like

Keep it under your sporran!

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to chrisonabike | 9 months ago
0 likes

chrisonabike wrote:

Keep it under your sporran!

I thought that was for storing your porridge?

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to hawkinspeter | 9 months ago
0 likes
hawkinspeter wrote:

chrisonabike wrote:

Keep it under your sporran!

I thought that was for storing your porridge?

Yes, but the weight can also keep your spurtle under control.

Avatar
brooksby replied to chrisonabike | 9 months ago
2 likes

chrisonabike wrote:
hawkinspeter wrote:

chrisonabike wrote:

Keep it under your sporran!

I thought that was for storing your porridge?

Yes, but the weight can also keep your spurtle under control.

Isn't that a Pokemon?

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to brooksby | 9 months ago
0 likes

It's just my spurtle!  I'm not thinking of having a poke,mon!

Avatar
OnYerBike replied to stonojnr | 9 months ago
2 likes

stonojnr wrote:

I think he's wrong, legally speaking anyway, wild peeing as it's called, is a criminal offence under the public order act, so it's irrelevant if its littering or not.

It's not "irrelevant" - if you are fined for a specific offence, it is certainly relevant whether or not you have committed that offence. 

As for the Public Order Act (which one?), feel free to elaborate under exactly which Section you think wild peeing would be an offence.

Avatar
stonojnr replied to OnYerBike | 9 months ago
0 likes

what am I a search engine ? its section 5 of Public Order Act 1986, falls under penalty notices for disorder.

and thats ignoring most councils will also have a byelaw against it too.

so yes its irrelevant to debate whether it falls under littering or not, because theres plenty of other stuff that does cover it

Avatar
ROOTminus1 replied to stonojnr | 9 months ago
0 likes
stonojnr wrote:

what am I a search engine ? its section 5 of Public Order Act 1986, falls under penalty notices for disorder.

Nor am I, but if you make claims it's your responsibility to back them up.
It is my claim the section 5 would only apply if you urinate on someone or urinate with the intent of causing offence. Not if you're trying to be modest a sneak a wee behind a tree

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to ROOTminus1 | 9 months ago
0 likes

quite,

so if you walk down a public street urinating in full view of everyone, it would be a public order offence, but peeing behind a hedge, could not possibly constitute "harrassment, alarm or distress"

And if the council are prosecuting people for "littering" for peeing in rural laybys, then are they also prosecuting dog owners when they pee on signposts or street lights, both of which can be damaged by the act.

The courts would grind to a halt.

Avatar
stonojnr replied to ROOTminus1 | 9 months ago
0 likes

Fair enough,then you won't mind me asking you to cite an example where that has happened then

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to stonojnr | 9 months ago
0 likes

stonojnr wrote:

what am I a search engine ? its section 5 of Public Order Act 1986, falls under penalty notices for disorder.

and thats ignoring most councils will also have a byelaw against it too.

so yes its irrelevant to debate whether it falls under littering or not, because theres plenty of other stuff that does cover it

bylaws normally applicable to parks and towncentres, not the entire countryside.

I think it's very relevant whetehr it constitutes littering if that's what the fine has been handed out for. 

Avatar
stonojnr replied to wycombewheeler | 9 months ago
0 likes

Depends on the council and how big a problem it is, I know around some racecourses councils have implemented them because its become a localised issue.

And I think Marsden in Yorkshire, which is just a village really, but part of Kirklees metro area which must be half a million populace, were looking to introduce it to stop some of the more badly behaved rail ale trailers who visit.

Avatar
mattw replied to OnYerBike | 9 months ago
1 like

It could potentially be criminalised via a PSPO, but I don't know if that was the case here.

Hemel Hempstead PSPO bans defecating, urinating, spitting and ... cycling in town centre
https://road.cc/content/news/266092-hemel-hempstead-pspo-bans-defecating...

Avatar
Matthew Acton-Varian | 9 months ago
4 likes

Regarding the Deputy Lord Mayor of Cork -

Who is (legally) going to take the space from him her, just because his her car isn't in it?

The space is noted as reserved specifically for the Deputy Mayor and therefore if (s)he rides his bike into office instead of driving his her car, (s)he can use his her space entirely how (s)he likes. It's not a space anyone else can use so how is it wasted? If it's wasted for a bike it's wasted for a car as a reserved spot.

*corrections. I did not read the article past the first line and missed the DM was female.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Matthew Acton-Varian | 9 months ago
4 likes

Exactly.  She could use it for storage or her pogo stick, or an old sofa, or anything else she wants.  It's a perk of the job.

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to brooksby | 9 months ago
2 likes

brooksby wrote:

Exactly.  She could use it for storage or her pogo stick, or an old sofa, or anything else she wants.  It's a perk of the job.

A park of the job, surely?

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Matthew Acton-Varian | 9 months ago
2 likes

Alternatively - if the Deputy Lord Mayor drives to work in a car appropriate to their exalted status - which then completely filled or even slightly overflowed the space - would their be outcry?  Or would it be "we need to repaint the lines, the spaces aren't big enough"?

As others have said perhaps it's time we started rethinking the idea of having reserved parking spaces (or workplace provision of same) at all?  Maybe our more enlightened representatives (and / or those we aspire to) could even lead from the front by setting an example!  (As the Deputy Lord Mayor is apparently doing...)

Still hard to imagine much of that in the UK though where driving is the unexamined default, normal, "practical" choice.  And where it still is so linked with our social status / is seen as an essential tool to access social functions / demonstrates our responsibility and ultimately social worth.

Avatar
Matthew Acton-Varian replied to chrisonabike | 9 months ago
0 likes

chrisonabike wrote:

Alternatively - if the Deputy Lord Mayor drives to work in a car appropriate to their exalted status - which then completely filled or even slightly overflowed the space - would their be outcry?  Or would it be "we need to repaint the lines, the spaces aren't big enough"?

That would be a dangerous precedent considering many advocacy groups are claiming (with supported evidence) modern cars are unneccessarily getting wider and should be stopped - Making the spaces fit the cars instead of making the cars fit the spaces is the wrong way to go and would make the situation even worse.

chrisonabike wrote:

As others have said perhaps it's time we started rethinking the idea of having reserved parking spaces (or workplace provision of same) at all?  Maybe our more enlightened representatives (and / or those we aspire to) could even lead from the front by setting an example!  (As the Deputy Lord Mayor is apparently doing...)

Having reserved parking at all is a completely different debate, however abolishing them altogether is unlikely and also could be problematic (perhaps a debate for another time).

But unless you are explicitly advocating for abolishing reserved spaces as an argument this is a waste of space, the argument is moot.

chrisonabike wrote:

Still hard to imagine much of that in the UK though where driving is the unexamined default, normal, "practical" choice.  And where it still is so linked with our social status / is seen as an essential tool to access social functions / demonstrates our responsibility and ultimately social worth.

Making such a seismic change requires both infrastructure and attitude changes which aren't exactly going to happen overnight. But by getting small key areas right, where high car use is most damaging, you can show what is possible, and other regions may follow suit.

Both Manchester and London have greatly improved infrastructure and they have seen lower car use and traffic volumes where the schemes are safe and convenient. I am aware that not all infra amongst those schemes is actually fit for purpose but if there is high profile awareness of success then those areas will be brought up to standard sooner rather than later.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Matthew Acton-Varian | 9 months ago
2 likes

Obviously I agree, but while I hope this happens I would raise a note of caution about the following (highlighted):

Matthew Acton-Varian wrote:

chrisonabike wrote:

Still hard to imagine much of that in the UK though where driving is the unexamined default, normal, "practical" choice.  And where it still is so linked with our social status / is seen as an essential tool to access social functions / demonstrates our responsibility and ultimately social worth.

Making such a seismic change requires both infrastructure and attitude changes which aren't exactly going to happen overnight. But by getting small key areas right, where high car use is most damaging, you can show what is possible, and other regions may follow suit.

This is (ostensibly) what the UK has been doing for generations.  (As David Hembrow wryly points out in this article.) Witness e.g. Cycling UK noting that a quarter century on from The National Cycling Strategy a government was launching what appeared to be a repeat of the same, asking the same questions as if they were new and appearing to set themselves up for the same fate.  We had "Cycling Demonstration Towns" in 2005, extended in 2009 - and then Cycling England disappeared in 2011.  Witness funding for active travel in England/Wales being cut (under cover of "we have allocated x millions ...") - the government itself acknowledges this.  Scotland stalling on this despite setting a more sensible active travel funding stream (vastly greater than England and Wales).  The Road Safety Investigation Branch failing to launch...

Yet we were building cycling infra separated from motor traffic in the 1930s.  We've had things like modal filters, LTNs and bus stop bypasses for decades.  Wander around most UK cities and you can find the relics of cycle infra of the last century.

More optimistically perhaps some local level changes in a few places will continue.  As you say London and (perhaps) Manchester can show "real cities" (e.g. not like special cases - Cambridge etc.) can do this and the world doesn't end - indeed everyone benefits.

Avatar
ktache replied to Matthew Acton-Varian | 9 months ago
2 likes

If I were her I'd be getting a ground anchor and a big chain and getting the works department to fit it, with permission of course. Peace of mind.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to ktache | 9 months ago
0 likes

As a deputy Lord Major she probably only qualifies for a small chain...

Avatar
Matthew Acton-Varian replied to chrisonabike | 9 months ago
0 likes

Pages

Latest Comments