As you'll have seen on the story and video below, Jamie has been getting stuck into 1x vs 2x this week, putting together a feature asking if a single front chainring is the future of cycling? Or just another marketing fad? Here's what you lot reckon...
In a nutshell...
Would anyone like to expand on that?
Jamie points out, "In reality, 1x is not a perfect solution to road bike gearing, but then neither is 2x. On that setup, you're lugging around six or so gears which aren't even useful to you – and at least with 1x every gear on the cassette is useful!"
D-Squared: "After watching the pros, I might be wondering if single chainrings are the future... or I might remember that pros have mechanics to switch chain rings (and cassettes) to suit each stage profile."
wtjs: "I won't be changing to 1x, and I won't be moving to Classified, even if the cassettes no longer cost £100s each. I still have a triple on my 'racer' but that's used less than 10 per cent of the time. I use the Vitus Gravel — and that's not only because the cable disc brakes are so much better."
Bloody hell, don't mention brakes, we've already got one divisive tech topic for today...
ErnieC: "To each their own. I'm still in 2 x10 and 2 x 11 so not in a position to comment on 1x but not changing my set-ups any time soon."
festina: "I run a 1*10 set-up on my road bike. I love the simplicity and the range of gears isn't that different, so many duplicates in 2* and 3* systems anyway."
Miller: "I put Campag Ekar on a bike for this year and I've done a lot of road riding on it. Ekar is 1x13 and I have it set up as 40 x 9-42. It works very well for road. I could maybe do with an intermediate sprocket for riding at about 30km/h but that's being really picky. For me 1x is not a revolutionary advance but it's pleasingly uncomplicated and makes washing your bike around the bottom bracket much easier!"
marmotte27: "Marketing fad."
philsinclair: "With 50/34 and 34/11, commonly used and needed where I live. The argument falls apart for a 1x."
Add new comment
48 comments
remember insurance is to cover you, not anyone else. If you are deemed to have caused damage or an injury, you will be liable for the costs whether or not you are insured. I can pay for any damage I am likely to do to a car. i cannot pay the settlement for serious injuries which may result. Or exorbitant legal fees.
https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/cyclist-faces-bankruptcy-over-100k-cos...
Not if you have third-party insurance, the clue's in the name, it's there specifically to cover the damages of anybody to whom you cause injury or financial loss. The story to which you link is specifically about someone who didn't have insurance.
I read that as "cover you" as in against liabilty (third party).
I think he's saying you will be liable for damages you cause whether you have insurance or not, the insurance is so you can avoid being bankrupted.
(But since the third party can't get more than all your money, they will also suffer if you don't have insurance.)'
Cycling insurance is cheap though (often included in house policies) and it may be useful to be able to easily get legal representation after an RTC. It's one of the reasons that I'm a member of Cycling UK.
But yes, there's no particular requirement for you to have it if you don't want it.
It's also part of my shockingly expensive theft and crash bicycle insurance now.
Is this a parody account? In Ben & Holly the Wise Old Elf character is nothing of the sort - routinely undermined and shown the error of his ways by the fairies (thanks to my daughter for hours of children's TV by osmosis).
I have insurance, but I'm afraid I don't pay any road tax.
Typical bloody cyclist. I bet you don't get your bike MOT'd either, do you?
It's under three years old, so doesn't need it.
Mine's from around the 70s so not needed either.
No one pays road tax.
I do.
With there being no government facility for it I just go out an chuck a handful of coins off a motorway bridge every few weeks. Just doing my part.
Troll!
Or alternatively we all do, only it's not called "road tax" specifically, just "tax". (Not owning a car currently I guess I'm putting more in than I'm getting out - unless you're a believer in the "small contact patch ergo massive damage" theory of road wear).
No, but I just had my vehicle tax reminder today. Remind me not to buy a car in December again! LOL
As for my bike, insured for theft as a named item on the house insurance, and myself covered by Cycling UK membership.
But have you got a cycling licence? And what about
number platestabards?They're in the post.
I left them in my other lycras.
I don't remember.
The sun was in my eyes.
Pages