Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Updated – Near Miss of the Day 549: Cyclist “flabbergasted” as magistrates acquit close pass driver (video includes swearing)

Our regular series featuring close passes from around the country - today it's Southwest London ...

A road.cc reader has said that the decision of magistrates to acquit a driver filmed making a very close pass on him at speed on a careless driving charge has left him “flabbergasted.”

We featured the video, shot by Rendel Harris while out on a bike ride with his wife in southwest London, on our Near Miss of the Day series back in February this year.

Rendel updated us on the outcome of the case after attending court as a witness on Monday.

He told us that the driver “was acquitted by the magistrates on the grounds that ‘there is insufficient evidence to prove the case of careless driving’.

“The defendant relied on a number of points to make his case, amongst them that I definitely made no checks behind me whatsoever, even though you can see from my shadow on the video (and the prosecuting solicitor pointed out) that I made at least three clear headchecks prior to signalling and carefully beginning to pull across the road (something the defendant chose to characterised as ‘veering wildly into my right of way’). 

“The defendant also claimed that my (admittedly fruity, but then I get like that when people try to kill me) bad language after the incident proved that I was in ‘an aggressive state of mind and probably not fit to be riding a bicycle on the public highway’.

“But here's the real kicker,” Rendel continued. “He claimed that he was not, as I stated, at least 40 metres behind me when I began to pull out, apparently that was ‘completely untrue’ (he should have a word with Susan, who was 40 metres behind me at the time, and he was behind her), in fact I was ‘two to three metres ahead’ when I pulled out.

“Leaving aside the fact that I rather enjoy life and I'm not in the habit of attempting suicide, he admitted to the court that he was travelling at 30 mph. At 30 mph, a car covers 13 metres per second.

“As can be seen on the video, he passes me three to four seconds after I signal and start to pull out, so had I been 2/3 metres ahead of him when I pulled out, he would’ve had no alternative but to have hit me, it's literally a physical impossibility to (allegedly) dive in front of a car going 30 mph that is 2/3 metres behind one and for the car either to stop or evade one, he would've had to react in 0.25 of a second to do that.

“The fact that it took him four seconds to catch up with me and make such a ridiculous close pass proves that he was shamelessly lying. Unbelievable.”

Rendel added: “Many thanks to the Metropolitan Police traffic office for bringing the prosecution, and to the prosecuting solicitor who did a very good job of presenting the evidence, why the magistrates chose to ignore it in toto is a matter for them.

“It does make one wonder if it's actually worth sending in any evidence if this is going to be the result; I suppose I will have to invest in a rear-facing camera as well if magistrates are so incapable of judging on the clear physical evidence placed before them!”

Clearly it’s a frustrating outcome not just for Rendel and his wife, but also for the investigating officers who deemed the close pass bad enough to refer it to the Crown Prosecution Service, and for the prosecutors who took the case to court; another day, and another court, and we suspect the verdict may have been different.

Here's our original story, published on 28 February 2021 under the heading, "Near Miss of the Day 549: Cyclist nearly taken out by speeding driver desperate to overtake (video includes swearing)."

*WARNING: VERY STRONG LANGUAGE*

A cyclist launches into a string of expletives after he is nearly knocked down from behind by a speeding driver desperate to overtake him before he makes a right hand turn. The strong language is perhaps understandable seeing as the rider was just centimetres away from being wiped out.

Today's near miss video was submitted by road.cc reader Rendel Harris and shows him riding along Malden Road in Worcester Park, London with his wife. 

Mr Harris explained what happened next and apologised for his choice of words but said "nearly being killed brought out some of my more robust expressions".

He said: "As I was riding along Malden Road, I prepared to move out in order to be ready for the upcoming right hand turn into Motspur Park Road.

"As can be clearly seen on the video from my shadow on the road, I made three separate head checks to ensure there was sufficient safe space for me to move out, and made a very clear hand signal.

"At this point my wife, who was approximately 50m behind me, seeing me signal, checked behind her to see if it was safe for her to start moving out as well.

"At this point the blue Peugeot was behind her; as soon as I started to move he floored the accelerator and swerved past me well in excess of the legal speed limit, missing me by a maximum of 20cm, probably much less.

"He also clearly put the oncoming car in danger as well. Sheer stupidity and spite.

"Apologies for the language, it turns out that being nearly killed brings out some of my more robust expressions."

Mr Harris said he reported the incident to the Metropolitan Police the same day and received a prompt reply saying the driver was being sent a Notice of Intended Prosecution.

However, when he tried to follow up on the outcome this month he said he was told 'no further details will be provided whether the case is active or not'.

> Near Miss of the Day turns 100 - Why do we do the feature and what have we learnt from it?

Over the years road.cc has reported on literally hundreds of close passes and near misses involving badly driven vehicles from every corner of the country – so many, in fact, that we’ve decided to turn the phenomenon into a regular feature on the site. One day hopefully we will run out of close passes and near misses to report on, but until that happy day arrives, Near Miss of the Day will keep rolling on.

If you’ve caught on camera a close encounter of the uncomfortable kind with another road user that you’d like to share with the wider cycling community please send it to us at info [at] road.cc or send us a message via the road.cc Facebook page.

If the video is on YouTube, please send us a link, if not we can add any footage you supply to our YouTube channel as an unlisted video (so it won't show up on searches).

Please also let us know whether you contacted the police and if so what their reaction was, as well as the reaction of the vehicle operator if it was a bus, lorry or van with company markings etc.

> What to do if you capture a near miss or close pass (or worse) on camera while cycling

Add new comment

145 comments

Avatar
Secret_squirrel | 3 years ago
9 likes

I for one would love to crowd fund something that brings a change in police guidance to actually treating us like the victims of close passes that we are rather than 'witnesses'. I wonder how you would go about it?

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to Secret_squirrel | 3 years ago
4 likes

Secret_squirrel wrote:

I for one would love to crowd fund something that brings a change in police guidance to actually treating us like the victims of close passes that we are rather than 'witnesses'. I wonder how you would go about it?

If you're a CUK member, I'd start by asking them; this seems like the kind of thing they'd take on.

Avatar
OldRidgeback | 3 years ago
5 likes

That's a very nasty close pass. It could very easily have been a lot worse and resulted in serious injury or even be fatal. I hope the cops take action. The driver is a danger to others.

Avatar
Philh68 | 3 years ago
12 likes

I've had drivers pull that sort of shit on me, but not as close as that -  the language is understandable. I'm happy to make Rendell an honorary Aussie for that effort, used all the necessary consonants in the correct order 😉

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Philh68 | 3 years ago
7 likes

Philh68 wrote:

I've had drivers pull that sort of shit on me, but not as close as that -  the language is understandable. I'm happy to make Rendell an honorary Aussie for that effort, used all the necessary consonants in the correct order 😉

Why thank you - as long as I can still support England in the Ashes! The language is a bit extra but I honestly was in total shock - been riding in London forty-odd years and am pretty used to most things, but in this case my hands were still shaking forty minutes later when we got home...

Avatar
brooksby replied to Rendel Harris | 3 years ago
2 likes

Definitely some good Anglo-Saxon language there!  Aussies don't have a monopoly on swearing  3

(Out of interest, how far over the posted speed limit do you reckon they were driving?  Other than "too f-ing much!")

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to brooksby | 3 years ago
2 likes

brooksby wrote:

Definitely some good Anglo-Saxon language there!  Aussies don't have a monopoly on swearing  3

(Out of interest, how far over the posted speed limit do you reckon they were driving?  Other than "too f-ing much!")

Well, I was riding around 15 mph and I think the other drivers were travelling at around the speed limit (30 mph on that road), so I would guess he was accelerating through 40-45 mph as he passed?

ETA: Being a nerd I've looked at Google maps and measured distance against the positions on the video - by my (admittedly slightly rough) reckoning he covers 45 metres in the two seconds after he passes me, which means a rough speed of 80kph/50 mph, and I reckon that would be about right.

Avatar
HoarseMann replied to Rendel Harris | 3 years ago
6 likes

I worked it out at 39 mph using the road markings (4 metre line, 2 metre gap) and counting video frames at 30fps. Quick enough to cause some serious injury. Terrible bit of impatient driving, glad you managed to avoid them.

I also don't get this victimless crime attitude from some police forces. Hopefully this can be challenged.

Avatar
Philh68 replied to brooksby | 3 years ago
4 likes

We sure don't have a monopoly on it, but we have made swearing our native tongue with English a second language… drivers like that inspire a vocabulary more colourful than a Dulux paint chart.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Philh68 | 3 years ago
3 likes

Philh68 wrote:

We sure don't have a monopoly on it, but we have made swearing our native tongue with English a second language… drivers like that inspire a vocabulary more colourful than a Dulux paint chart.

Too bl00dy right, mate!

 3

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to Rendel Harris | 3 years ago
3 likes

Rendel Harris wrote:

Philh68 wrote:

I've had drivers pull that sort of shit on me, but not as close as that -  the language is understandable. I'm happy to make Rendell an honorary Aussie for that effort, used all the necessary consonants in the correct order 😉

Why thank you - as long as I can still support England in the Ashes! The language is a bit extra but I honestly was in total shock - been riding in London forty-odd years and am pretty used to most things, but in this case my hands were still shaking forty minutes later when we got home...

Rendel, my sympathy, I've been there too, and it still affects me.  If you were still shaking forty minutes later, and it has affected the way you ride and therefore your life, you are definitely a victim.  Can I suggest you get statements from your wife and any friends who can attest to how it has affected you to prove that you were a victim, and then demand that the police treat you as such.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to eburtthebike | 3 years ago
2 likes

eburtthebike wrote:

Rendel, my sympathy, I've been there too, and it still affects me.  If you were still shaking forty minutes later, and it has affected the way you ride and therefore your life, you are definitely a victim.  Can I suggest you get statements from your wife and any friends who can attest to how it has affected you to prove that you were a victim, and then demand that the police treat you as such.

[/quote]

Thanks, yes - I shall be stressing that this was not a victimless incident as i pursue this. Says something about police attitudes to cyclists that we are treated in these cases as if we are simply observers with no more feelings or rights to consideration than a traffic camera!

Avatar
alansmurphy replied to Rendel Harris | 3 years ago
4 likes

The victim was on the bike and others behind if they'd witnessed the disembarkment of your body parts and the impacts on no father or husband.

 

Vitimless fucking crime my arse!

Avatar
alansmurphy replied to Rendel Harris | 3 years ago
1 like

The victim was on the bike and others behind if they'd witnessed the disembarkment of your body parts and the impacts on no father or husband.

 

Vitimless f-ing crime my arse!

Avatar
riskymoth | 3 years ago
15 likes

I've had this happen to me several times - I double check for a gap, clearly indicate to turn right, and someone tries to overtake regardless whilst moving to the centre. There's no way these drivers would do this if I was driving my car, yet somehow if you're riding a bike, you have to beg to be allowed to make this manoeuvre, and punished if "permission" has not been granted. Appalling entitled bullying behaviour. I dread to think what the consequences would be if this happened whist actually turning right.

Avatar
brooksby replied to riskymoth | 3 years ago
7 likes

I have to admit that I stopped putting a flat hand out to indicate and started using my hand to point, usualy an emphatic arm movement ("I am damned well going in that direction, I'm intending to make this manoeuvre, and you are behind me so I have priority!").

I guess the only problem there is when the following vehicle is travelling so fast and so selfishly that they have no intention of backing off (as Rendel has illustrated here).

(Who would care to wager that if Rendel had had the opportunity to actually speak to the motorist, that they wouldn't have a clue at why he'd been swearing at them...?)

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to brooksby | 3 years ago
5 likes

I suspect it would have been one of the conversations I've had more than once: "You nearly killed me back there." "Well you're here aren't you so I didn't, stop being such a drama queen."

Avatar
Velophaart_95 | 3 years ago
13 likes

Driving like that has no place on the roads; however, if any action is taken, it will be a slap on the wrists. Driving is a privilege, not a right - this driver's right should be taken away. 

 

Avatar
FrankH replied to Velophaart_95 | 3 years ago
4 likes

Velophaart_95 wrote:

Driving like that has no place on the roads...

Agreed

Quote:

Driving is a privilege, not a right...

Agreed

Quote:

...this driver's right should be taken away.

You just said it isn't a right and I agree. I think you mean privilege should be taken away, and I agree with that.

Avatar
Hirsute | 3 years ago
4 likes

Shows the importance of the narrative when making a submission. You really have to draw the attention to the head checks to make sure the viewer can see the shadow and the time gap.

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
6 likes

That looked absolutely lethal. Is the video sped up at all?

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
3 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

That looked absolutely lethal. Is the video sped up at all?

No, regular speed.

 

Avatar
Awavey replied to Rendel Harris | 3 years ago
1 like

it looks sped up fwiw,my footage never looks like Im riding that quickly so effortlessly, but I think its camera frame rate thing not an actual speed up, possibly a GoPro camera as that seems to be tuned to process footage in a more action style (ie make it look amazing as you descend a mountain) rather as than pure "dashcam" output.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Awavey | 3 years ago
5 likes

Ah - the "effortlessness" may be due to the fact that I was on my ebike - had just been to visit my mother who lives in that neck of the woods and take her some stuff, so ebike was the choice for lugging a rucksac about.

Avatar
ktache | 3 years ago
18 likes

This incident shows that this drivers impatient and bullying actions threatened and put in danger Rendel's life and wellbeing.  He was not merely a witness to it, he was a victim of the motorists behavior.

As a victim of an offence he should be informed of the outcome.

The difference between seeing someone being threatened by a person with a knife or being threatened by a person with a knife.

Pages

Latest Comments