Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Cyclist stopped by police three times and “told to put bike in van” after a “load of complaints” from motorists on foggy climb

Isle of Man Constabulary says officers were “dispatched to check on the welfare of the cyclist” after several reports of near misses with drivers

A cyclist who was riding in foggy conditions on the Isle of Man’s Mountain Road says he was stopped by police three times and ordered to “put my bike in the van as it was too dangerous”, following complaints from motorists on the climb.

Chris Glencorse, from Scissett, West Yorkshire, was climbing the A18 Snaefell Mountain Road between Ramsey and Douglas yesterday, as part of a three-day cycling trip to the Isle of Man, when he was stopped by officers who were dispatched to check on his welfare, after several drivers reported that they had nearly struck the cyclist due to the apparent poor visibility and adverse conditions on the road.

A video of the incident was posted on Twitter yesterday afternoon by Chris following his ride and has since been viewed over 650,000 times.

In the post, the cyclist wrote: “Unbelievably the Isle of Man Police thought it was appropriate to stop me three times while cycling over the mountain, the last time to tell me to put the bike in the van because of complaints by car drivers. That’s not how the Highway Code works. I didn’t get in the van.”

However, a spokesperson for the Isle of Man Constabulary told road.cc that the officers simply “offered to transport the cyclist and his bicycle to Douglas to ensure he arrived safely” and that the incident was a “timely reminder to all motorists that cyclists frequently use the A18 Mountain Road” and to “ensure that you drive/cycle to the conditions and arrive at your destination safely”.

Glencorse, a 51-year-old utility and touring cyclist who has completed in recent years bucket list rides such as Land’s End to John O’Groats, the Hebridean Way, Mizen Head to Malin Head, and L’Etape du Tour, says he was inspired to take on the Isle of Man’s famous hills by reading Simon Warren’s seminal 100 Greatest Cycling Climbs books.

“The book started me off on to do lists, and I’m slowly working my way through the second 100, so thought I’d do a quick tour of the island, do a lap of the TT course, and tick the three climbs off,” he tells road.cc.

The Yorkshire-based cyclist says he normally takes on his cycle touring trips with friends, but couldn’t quite convince them that three sodden spring days on the Isle of Man would be much fun.

“Obviously the weather was horrendous [yesterday], but I’m here and there is no such thing as bad weather, just the wrong clothes, so I set out, as I have done countless times before in bad weather,” he continued.

“I’ve two lights on the back, a 1200 lumen front light, had a bright orange jacket on, and hi viz overshoes and gloves.

“All was okay for the first 29 miles, if horrible and wet and windy, then I started the climb out of Ramsey. The road was busyish, but no more than say Holme Moss back home, and while visibility wasn’t great, it was about 200 yards so fine to be seen.”

Cyclist stopped by police while riding on Isle of Man Mountain Road 2 (credit - Chris Glencorse)

A photo taken by Chris as he made his way along the road

However, as Chris made his way up the famous Isle of Man TT climb – which was reopened earlier this week to traffic after icy conditions forced it to close for six days – he was stopped by police following reports from “concerned” drivers who had passed the cyclist on the road.

“I’ll admit I’m not the fastest climber, but slow and steady wins the race, and I’d just got past the really steep bit when a police van pulled up alongside and scared the s*** out of me by giving it the full blues and twos,” he says.

“[The officer] opened his window and told me he wanted to speak to me and to pull in at the bungalow about half a mile ahead. I told him I wasn’t doing anything wrong, and he said they’d had ‘a load of complaints’ from car drivers that a cyclist was riding up the mountain in all black and couldn’t be seen.”

After stopping at the bungalow as instructed, Chris then refused to provide the officer with his name, “as I was doing nothing wrong”.

He continued: “He repeated the complaints of the motorists, at which point I pointed to my hi viz clothes, the lights, and then asked him what I was doing wrong. He confirmed I wasn’t doing anything wrong, at which point I told him I was going to carry on.”

Chris then told road.cc that he was approached again by the same officer five minutes later, and that he once again refused to stop, before the driver allegedly “pulled around me” and forced the cyclist to come to a halt.

“He then told me his sergeant had told him I had to put my bike in the van as it was too dangerous and they would drive me back to Douglas,” he claims.

“It’s here I slightly lost my s***. I told him he’d have to arrest me to get me into the van. He then got me to sign something to say I was carrying on at my own risk, at which point I asked him, does that mean if a car ploughs into me it would be my fault?

“After now becoming piss wet through and freezing, I told him I was carrying on so if he kindly would leave me alone. To be fair, I had some sympathy with the officer, he was just doing what he was being told and he did seem uncomfortable.

“Anyway the day was now a bit ruined, so I had a cup of coffee in Douglas and made my way to Castletown.”

Chris told road.cc that he is currently contemplating reporting the officers for what he believes were their unnecessary actions on the road.

However, the Isle of Man Constabulary has since argued that their officers acted following reports from callers “concerned” for the cyclist’s safety “due to the poor visibility and heavy fog”.

“Yesterday, we received a number of calls from members of the public in regards to concerns for a cyclist on the A18 the Mountain Road,” a spokesperson told road.cc.

“Several of the concerned callers advised that the weather was adverse (heavy fog) and stated that they had nearly struck the cyclist.

“Following this, officers were dispatched to check on the welfare of the cyclist, who advised he was cycling from Ramsey to Douglas. The officers offered to transport the cyclist and his bicycle to Douglas to ensure he arrived safely. However, this was declined.

“We are pleased to say that the cyclist arrived in Douglas safely, but this is a timely reminder to all motorists that cyclists frequently use the A18 Mountain Road and therefore please ensure that you drive/cycle to the conditions and arrive at your destination safely.”

After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

105 comments

Avatar
Adam Sutton replied to Rendel Harris | 1 year ago
1 like

Ok, so cycling in wet foggy conditions up a "big steep hill" is sensible? And one should be surprised if people show concern?

How fast is he cycling given the admission of “I’ll admit I’m not the fastest climber, but slow and steady wins the race,"

Should all traffic be expected to traverse the "big hill" at 5mph? Lets have a reality check please. 

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Adam Sutton | 1 year ago
10 likes
Adam Sutton wrote:

Should all traffic be expected to traverse the "big hill" at 5mph? Lets have a reality check please. 

All traffic should be expected to drive at a speed which enables them to brake within the distance they can see. Highway Code 235: "[In fog you should] be able to pull up well within the distance you can see clearly."

Not just Highway Code advice but absolute common sense advice. Is the "reality check" we need to have that drivers simply aren't going to observe either the highway code or basic safety precautions?

 

 

Avatar
AltBren replied to Adam Sutton | 1 year ago
4 likes

Only until they can safely pass, like normal for any vehicle. Why is a bike always different..?

And they clearly weren't concerned, just annoyed.

Avatar
Brauchsel replied to Adam Sutton | 1 year ago
6 likes

"Ok, so cycling in wet foggy conditions up a "big steep hill" is sensible?"

It's basically the main point of cycling. 

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Rendel Harris | 1 year ago
3 likes

Hmm... a bit teacup and storm here?  Apart from the "being stopped 3 times" - surely you go and find out once, make a decision and that's it?  Only sensible reason I can think of for repeating the process is if visibility declined to zero - in which case why are the police still driving around?

I'd note that the police weren't telling drivers not to drive, express a lack of surprise at that and move on.

Avatar
Backladder replied to Adam Sutton | 1 year ago
6 likes

They nearly hit a cyclist in 200 yard visibility?

Avatar
Adam Sutton replied to Backladder | 1 year ago
0 likes
Backladder wrote:

They nearly hit a cyclist in 200 yard visibility?

Nothing in the article states anyone nearly hit him.

Avatar
Backladder replied to Adam Sutton | 1 year ago
3 likes
Adam Sutton wrote:
Backladder wrote:

They nearly hit a cyclist in 200 yard visibility?

Nothing in the article states anyone nearly hit him.

Inferred from the drivers saying the cyclist "couldn't be seen" and the first words you usually hear after a driver has run into you SMIDSY.

Avatar
Adam Sutton replied to Backladder | 1 year ago
1 like

Ah my apolgies for attempting to be objective and not toe the line of the accepted narrative. My bad!

Avatar
AltBren replied to Adam Sutton | 1 year ago
2 likes

Poor you seriously? Grow up dude

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to Adam Sutton | 1 year ago
3 likes
Adam Sutton wrote:

Ah my apolgies for attempting to be objective and not toe the line of the accepted narrative. My bad!

I've lost track; which version of which cycle-hating troll are you?

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to eburtthebike | 1 year ago
2 likes

I think this is not the new chorus member you're looking for eburtthebike.  Hopefully they re-read the article at some point and let it go.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Adam Sutton | 1 year ago
12 likes
Adam Sutton wrote:

Nothing in the article states anyone nearly hit him.

Police spokesperson (third para from the end): "“Several of the concerned callers advised that the weather was adverse (heavy fog) and stated that they had nearly struck the cyclist."

Avatar
ShutTheFrontDawes replied to Rendel Harris | 1 year ago
3 likes
Rendel Harris wrote:
Adam Sutton wrote:

Nothing in the article states anyone nearly hit him.

Police spokesperson (third para from the end): "“Several of the concerned callers advised that the weather was adverse (heavy fog) and stated that they had nearly struck the cyclist."

In Adam's defence, comprehension clearly is not their strong suit.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Adam Sutton | 1 year ago
3 likes

I also didn't read the article closely enough.  Having gone back and done so I see more clearly why this guy was irritated.  On the point:

road.cc wrote:

...when he was stopped by officers who were dispatched to check on his welfare, after several drivers reported that they had nearly struck the cyclist due to the apparent poor visibility and adverse conditions on the road.

...

“Yesterday, we received a number of calls from members of the public in regards to concerns for a cyclist on the A18 the Mountain Road,” a spokesperson told road.cc.

“Several of the concerned callers advised that the weather was adverse (heavy fog) and stated that they had nearly struck the cyclist.

To be fair this is probably them using that phrase casually (like "I was nearly killed by a cyclist whizzing past!").

Pages

Latest Comments