Broadcaster and outspoken cycling advocate Jeremy Vine has prompted a discussion about how road users share space in urban environments, and suggested vehicle drivers overtaking cyclists in cities is "pointless".
Accompanied by one of his now-famous 360-degree camera videos, in which a taxi driver overtakes him five times only to drop back behind the cyclist at traffic lights, Vine said, "there's a strong argument that motor vehicles should not be allowed to overtake bicycles in cities.
"If you watch this clip from my commute, you'll see there is no point whatsoever in any of this driver's five overtakes — even with the roads clear.
"No complaints about the cab driver: he never passed too close. But why can't he see: even without traffic, it's pointless to overtake a bicycle in a city?"
It was to be expected that the Vine on 5 host's eye-catching suggestion would be challenged by those who disagree, with Vine summarising his argument in response.
"The argument is that a bicycle is faster, so every single overtake he does will have to be repeated. And as you see from the film, even though he is quite a good driver, all overtaking involves a slight increase in risk," Vine tweeted.
"I think my point is that any overtake bears risk, and they should be avoided if possible, and the clip clearly establishes that motor vehicles are slower than bicycles, so it's best for him not to overtake me at all."
Despite the inevitable anger in many replies to the broadcaster's suggestion, some agreed with the sentiment of the point.
Rory Meakin said: "This video illustrates quite well how, for most journeys in cities, cycling is faster than driving. Sure, the top speed in a car is higher, and if you’re driving at 2am mainly on a 40mph+ road driving will be quicker. But for most trips it’s ill-suited"
Irish Fine Gael politician Ciaran Cannon insisted the idea bikes are faster than cars at getting from "Point A to Point B" in urban environments is "not up for debate, it's just a fact".
Vine regularly shares videos on social media of footage captured while he cycles around the capital, including dangerous driving, celebrity encounters and basically anything and everything interesting.
He is also a regular on his penny-farthing, and was taken to hospital and left with a black eye after falling from his high wheeler last month.
The week before his penny-farthing fall, Vine shared footage of a high-speed overtake in a 20mph zone, which he said "not meaning to overdramatise [...] the closest I've come to dying on my bicycle."
Add new comment
40 comments
I think we have spotted the type of driver that tailgates learner drivers
I'm guessing you didn't read the tweet by Ciaran Cannon? you know the one that put average driving speed in London's main traffic corridors at 8 or 9mph..... you know the speed that you said the delivery riders are doing.....
Ok, you have pointed out a street where cyclists are slower than you..... do you find that the cyclists riding up Leece Street manage to catch up or get back in front of you when you hit traffic? If the answer is yes, which lets face it is quite likely then it just goes to prove Jeremy's point.
It's not just in cities that it's pointless, in a lot of routes in medium to small towns it's equally pointless. On my old cycle commute, in a town with a population of 30,000 (so a small town by my reckoning) I would regularly get overtaken by cars on parts of the commute where there were no cycle lanes, but less than a mile later when they got to the town centre they would be stuck in traffic where I would sail past them in the bus/cycle lane.
Thats either a different definition of most to the one I am familiar with or your city/town is different to the ones I have seen.
I think we need a bit of both. Ideally, you want to separate cycle and motor traffic. What they do in the Netherlands, is to try and encourage cars to use a particular road and cycles another, parallel-ish, street (with the bikes getting the more direct route). Overtaking can be prohibited on the quieter road, but allowed on the busier street.
I can't see that working in the UK as the most direct routes always seem to prioritise motor traffic and cyclists are persuaded to take the longer routes.
Also, I'd rather that overtaking be allowed on quieter streets. It's the busy ones that don't provide any benefit for drivers to overtake cyclists.
You forgot to put the scare quotes around 'persuaded'.
It would be a hard sell in the UK, as it does mean displacing traffic even more so than LTN's do.
The trouble with preventing overtaking on a busy street and allowing it on a quieter route, is it risks flipping that situation - i.e. the busy street becomes quiet, because drivers don't want to sit behind cyclists, and the quiet route becomes a rat-run.
Trust me with a bit of creative street furniture, restrictive infrastructure or urban architecture most drivers will stick with the busy main roads as the side streets will be less efficient for most routes.
Sure a few will get a benefit but that will be localised to the beginning and end of journeys
I can't see that working in the UK...
Because UK police aren't the slightest bit interested in enforcing traffic law with proper penalties for offences against cyclists- close passing by Discovery YG13 LWM
.
Bad, agreed, but that's nowt.
.
Today nearly got taken out at a roundabout by ... by ... by a four ken ambulance cutting across the front of me from outside lane to a slip road!
.
Pages