Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Charity that runs London parks wants new laws to prosecute cyclists for breaking 20mph speed limit in Regent's Park and Richmond Park

The Royal Parks oversees popular training and riding routes for London cyclists, the body's chairman asking government to "set speed limits for cyclists" in its parks and for riders above 20mph limit to be prosecuted...

The charity responsible for London's Royal Parks has asked the government to amend legislation "with a view to setting speed limits for cyclists" in its parks which, if introduced, could see riders exceeding 20mph speed limits prosecuted.

The organisation runs London's Royal Parks — two of which, Richmond Park and Regent's Park — are popular with the capital's cyclists and attract a large number of two-wheeled visitors throughout the year.

Richmond Park 04 copyright Simon MacMichael

Writing to Sir Chris Bryant, the Minister for Creative Industries, Arts and Tourism, the Telegraph reports that The Royal Parks chairman Loyd Grossman (the former presenter of MasterChef and Through the Keyhole) has asked government to amend laws so that cyclists failing to adhere to the parks' 20mph speed limits can be prosecuted for speeding.

The letter comes at the end of a summer when The Royal Parks cited cyclists riding "at excessive speeds" and causing crashes as the reason for it reviewing its cycling policy, while also cancelling early-morning time trial events in Richmond Park and the London Duathlon.

In May, Strava deleted "Regent's Park as a segment on the app" following pressure from The Royal Parks, the move coming following the death of a pensioner who died from her injuries sustained in a collision with a cyclist riding laps of the park at 25-29mph.

Regent's Park and Outer Circle Strava segment (Google Maps/Strava)

The death of Hilda Griffiths in 2022, a case much-publicised earlier this year following a coroner's inquest, sparked Royal Parks action on cycling, as well as Conservative MP Iain Duncan-Smith to launch his campaign for stricter punishments for cyclists who kill or injure.

> Cyclists "horrified" by Iain Duncan Smith's Telegraph column suggesting "dangerous cyclists should be driven off our roads", as Conservative MP accused of ignoring main road safety issues in latest call for stricter legislation

It was heard at the inquest that the cyclist involved, Brian Fitzgerald, would not face prosecution as the Metropolitan Police deemed there was "insufficient evidence for a real prospect of conviction". He was riding laps of Regent's Park as part of a group ride travelling at between 25-29mph when he hit the 81-year-old pedestrian as she crossed the road, causing her several broken bones and bleeding on the brain, injuries she died from in hospital two months later.

The letter written to government seeks an amendment to The Royal Parks and Other Open Spaces Regulations 1997 "with a view to setting speed limits for cyclists".

"This will match what is already in place for motor vehicles on our park roads, namely a maximum speed limit of 20mph," Mr Grossman writes. "Whilst we recognise there are challenges associated with this request, most notably on enforcement, we believe it is a change that would improve safety within the parks for both cyclists and other park users."

A spokesperson for the charity added: "We have a responsibility to everyone who uses the parks to ensure we are acting in a way that protects and promotes their safety."

A source from the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport said the proposal would be considered "carefully".

Richmond Park 03 copyright Simon MacMichael

Discussion around speed limits in The Royal Parks, notably Richmond Park, have been long running. 

Despite initially suggesting speed limits did apply to cyclists, in 2021 it was confirmed that the park's speed limits (which range from 5mph to 20mph) do not apply to cyclists, a stance in line with the wider law.

Then, in the summer of 2022, The Royal Parks said that even if the speed limits do not apply to cyclists, riders would still have action taken if they ride "recklessly".

In July, we reported that a group claiming to represent cyclists who use the park (Richmond Park Cyclists) had clashed with the charity over its speed limit advice for riders using the park.

This summer's Richmond Park Time Trials were also cancelled by The Royal Parks. Organised by the London Dynamo cycling club and first run in 2009, they were due to take place on 23 June and 7 July this year – and had been praised for their inclusivity and for providing a gateway into the sport, enabling beginners to compete on road bikes and on almost traffic-free roads due to their 6am starts.

London Dynamo Richmond Park time trials (Richmond Park Cyclists)

However, The Royal Parks cancelled this summer's events over fears riders would break the park's 20mph speed limit, a decision which left organisers "fuming" and arguing the decision had been clouded by "very irresponsible journalism" and that the alternative is "busy roads and fast-moving cars".

"Following several cycling-related incidents, it is our duty to take action to minimise the risk of accidents and our priority to ensure the safety of all cyclists together with other visitors," Richmond Park's manager said. September's London Duathlon in the park was subsequently also cancelled.

The Royal Parks has received plenty of criticism over the years for its approach to improving road safety in its parks. Many, including the London Cycling Campaign (LCC), have repeatedly asked why through-traffic is still allowed to use Richmond Park as a shortcut, the campaign calling the cancellation of well-organised events "weak" while "daily rat-runs" continue.

While some of Richmond Park's roads are closed to motor traffic on weekends, during weekdays the green space, which The Royal Parks proudly calls an "extraordinary landscape" that is also London's largest Site of Special Scientific Interest and a National Nature Reserve, is used as a cut-through for motorists driving between Kingston upon Thames, Richmond and Roehampton.

Richmond Park queues (via The Royal Parks, Twitter)

[Sunny summer weekend traffic in Richmond Park]

The LCC has campaigned for the park to be closed to through-traffic for years, arguing it would improve road safety and make them "far better for people walking, cycling and relaxing in".

Two weeks ago, specialist cycling insurance provider ETA Services Ltd called it an "ongoing embarrassment" that The Royal Parks "allows this nature reserve to be used as a rat-run", the comments coming in response to the incident below.

Dan is the road.cc news editor and has spent the past four years writing stories and features, as well as (hopefully) keeping you entertained on the live blog. Having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for the Non-League Paper, Dan joined road.cc in 2020. Come the weekend you'll find him labouring up a hill, probably with a mouth full of jelly babies, or making a bonk-induced trip to a south of England petrol station... in search of more jelly babies.

Add new comment

46 comments

Avatar
GMBasix | 8 hours ago
3 likes

There are far too many knee-jerk, anti-cycling responses to amplified risks.

Are there no grown-ups there?

Avatar
LastBoyScout | 8 hours ago
1 like

I have to say I do have sympathy with them cancelling the time trials.

If you have a 20mph speed limit in the park, even if that doesn't legaly apply to cyclists, then holding an event where competitors openly endeavor to go as fast as possible, which will certainly be well over that for the keen ones, seems reckless and hypocritical, unless you have the infrastructure in place - such as closing the whole park during the event/barriers/whatever - to prevent any possibility of a crash with any other member of public.

Avatar
Pub bike replied to LastBoyScout | 8 hours ago
7 likes

These events were held early in the morning so that the risk to the general public has always been very low.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to LastBoyScout | 8 hours ago
13 likes

The time trials began at 6AM, an hour before the park is open to cars; with a startlist of around 60 riders in total (IIRC) and a 10 mile course they were pretty much over before any cars were on the roads. They've been run successfully since 2009 without, as far as I'm aware, any injuries being caused to non-participants, which would appear to indicate that Royal Parks have invented a problem/health and safety threat that simply didn't exist.

Avatar
anotherflat | 8 hours ago
4 likes

So given that the Met have routinely stationed traffic police at the bottom of hills in Richmond Park to point speed guns at cyclists, including the short period during lockdown when it was open to cyclists but not cars, are the Met and Royal Parks guilty of wasting police time?
Should this guy be refunded https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/london-cyclist-fined-for-speeding...

Avatar
the little onion | 9 hours ago
7 likes

This is culture wars nonsense, not just because of the lack of attention to the real dangers on the roads. To make this law happen, you would need two things:

-enforce a rule requiring all cyclists (presumably including 3-year olds on their Thomas the Tank Engine tricyle) to have speedometers which are of the same level of accuracy as car speedometers. So not GPS-based ones which can be glitchy.

-have an accurate way of measuring cyclists' speeds by the enforcers. As I understand it, the system used in speed cameras won't work with cyclists because there isn't enough metal in a bike, even steel framed bikes, to produce a good enough measurement. 

Without these two technological and legal developments, the system just isn't viable. 

Less of a sledgehammer to crack a nut, more of a massive wrecking ball to crack a nut.

Avatar
Pub bike replied to the little onion | 8 hours ago
5 likes

All bicycles would also need to undergo a regular MOT to check that the speedometer is fitted and working.  There would need to be a database and testing centres and statutory fee etc.  How many members of parliament in their right minds would really vote for such a law whilst thousands die each year from being hit by cars?

Avatar
open_roads replied to Pub bike | 8 hours ago
1 like

Judging by the hundreds of fools just elected - quite a few.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to the little onion | 8 hours ago
2 likes
the little onion wrote:

have an accurate way of measuring cyclists' speeds by the enforcers. As I understand it, the system used in speed cameras won't work with cyclists because there isn't enough metal in a bike, even steel framed bikes, to produce a good enough measurement. 

I agree wholeheartedly with your remarks in general but I think speed guns can capture bike speeds pretty accurately, can't they? In several places where I ride regularly there are those signs on lamp posts that light up with your speed and a smiling or frowning emoji depending on whether or not you are under the speed limit; the speed they show when I trip them is always the same as the reading on my GPS device. Before Royal Parks had to back down and admit that the speeding laws in their parks don't apply to cyclists they handed out quite a few speeding tickets to cyclists caught with radar guns, I don't recall anyone challenging the validity of their measurements.

Avatar
the little onion replied to Rendel Harris | 8 hours ago
2 likes
Rendel Harris]</p>

<p>[quote=the little onion

wrote:

I don't recall anyone challenging the validity of their measurements.

Yes, they haven't been challenged yet. My understandign is that the accuracy with cyclists/bikes is nowhere near that of cars, and a measurement wouldn't stand up in court unless it was miles over the limit. 

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to the little onion | 7 hours ago
0 likes
the little onion wrote:

a measurement wouldn't stand up in court unless it was miles over the limit. 

Trouble is it's quite easy to be miles over the limit in Richmond Park, there are several long steepish descents where you can get up to about 30 mph virtually freewheeling, especially coming down Sawyer's Hill from Richmond gate to Roehampton Gate, it's around 2.5 km, average 2.5%  (7% maximum) gradient, if you set out about 15 mph at the top you can easily reach 30 mph at the bottom.

Avatar
mdavidford replied to Rendel Harris | 7 hours ago
1 like
Rendel Harris wrote:

In several places where I ride regularly there are those signs on lamp posts that light up with your speed and a smiling or frowning emoji depending on whether or not you are under the speed limit; the speed they show when I trip them is always the same as the reading on my GPS device.

Not my experience at all. It's usually somewhere in the ballpark, but not unusual (particularly when there are other vehicles around, but sometimes when there's not) for it to give a completely nonsensical reading. And in any case, there's a difference between being good enough to give a close enough reading most of the time that people believe them enough to adjust their speed, and being reliably accurate enough that the reading would stand up in court.

Avatar
slc replied to mdavidford | 6 hours ago
0 likes

I don't think it would be that difficult to come up with a measurement system that would stand up even if the radar did not, for example the painted lines that accompany fixed speed cameras.

It also seems possible this would be an FPN offense, where the cyclist is in effect asked to admit to the offense or risk a court appearance, bigger fine, etc.

As for requiring a speedo on the bike, the courts might just take the view that they are widely available and a cyclist that risks exceeding the (fast for an average citizen, if not a trained rider) speed limit is well advised to obtain one.

Avatar
LeadenSkies replied to Rendel Harris | 6 hours ago
2 likes

When you trip them is the key point here. I would estimate 50% of those devices don't register my passing at all and others give a reading so far removed from the truth that I can only think they are picking up a vehicle approaching behind rather than me. Any device that suggests I am capable of doing 41mph on the flat nearing the end of a 100 mile ride is living on a different planet to reality.

Avatar
brooksby replied to the little onion | 7 hours ago
4 likes
the little onion wrote:

Less of a sledgehammer to crack a nut, more of a massive wrecking ball to crack a nut.

Just take off and nuke that nut from orbit - it's the only way to be sure… 

Avatar
OldRidgeback | 9 hours ago
7 likes

While 'furious cycling' isn't smart, it's obvious to anyone who has any idea of the UK's road safety data that cyclists are not the problem on the country's roads.

Pages

Latest Comments