A cyclist in Oldham has been fined £220 by magistrates for cycling without a front light on his bike.
Manchester Magistrates’ Court also ordered 18-year-old Jack Holt, of Roundthorn Road in Oldham, to pay £124 in costs, the Oldham Times reports.
The teenager was stopped by police while cycling with no front light on the Whetstone Hill Road in Oldham in August 2021.
It is illegal to ride a bike without lights and reflectors between sunset and sunrise, under the Roads Vehicles Lighting Regulations Act 1989, which was last amended in 2009.
Holt was sentenced in his absence on Wednesday 16 March, and has been ordered to pay the full fine of £344 by the middle of April.
> Cyclists could face £1,000 fine if caught riding in pedestrianised zones
Normally, fixed penalty notices of £50 would be handed out to anyone caught cycling without lights or reflectors. In some areas, those fines can even be waived if the cyclist can prove that they subsequently purchased lights.
However, as with driving offences, it is likely that the fine was higher in this case because it went to court.
> Essex cyclist fined £225 for riding without lights
In 2015 an Essex cyclist was fined £225 for failing to have lights and reflectors on his bike. That case went to court as the cyclist failed to complete an online cycling education course, which Essex Police offers to those who have been caught failing to comply with road traffic signs, or riding on the footpath or without lights.
Costing £19.50, the course takes approximately half an hour and police say that if the offender fails to complete it, action will then be taken through the courts.
Add new comment
38 comments
Perhaps he's a notorious local gang leader but the only offence the Feds can pin on him is, er, 'cycling at night without lights'. You know, like Al Capone being done for tax evasion.
A gang leader brought to justice and a criminal empire collapsed via a £344 fine....
So in reality teenage ignored summons and paid the price. Would have happened with any offence. The nature of the offence was incidental.
Glad the police and the CPS are really prioritising these major crimes.
I have no problem with the police chasing minor misdemeanours. There is evidence that to have an impact at the top of the triangle you need to start at the bottom. Besides, unless there were aggravating circumstances then I assume the perp only ended up at the thick end of the process by failing to get off sooner with an online course etc.
Now, if they are looking for other quick prosecutions, how about all the cars with no front plate or with obscured plates? That's a£1000 fine, and confiscation of a cherished number.
There's a £60K Range Rover Vogue near me, parks on the road as they don't have a drive. Tax expired December 2020, according to a disgruntled neighbour it's been reported to the police and DVLA numerous times, but it's still parked outside their house, and still hasn't been taxed.
Hmm, gosh, so does that mean their insurance would not cover them in the event of a loss?
Had the MOT expired too? Then the vehicle is almost certainly not insured.
Pages