Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

California county bans brakeless fixies

Ventura county shuts trails and bike paths to any bike without brakes

California’s Ventura County has banned fixed-wheel bikes from trails and bike paths.

A hit-and-run crash between two riders on the Ojai Valley Trail  in September left one with severe injuries. The other fled the scene but was reported by parks director Ron Van Dyck to be riding a bike with no brakes at high speed.

Park officials therefore pushed for a ban on fixed-wheel bikes, which are sometimes ridden without brakes. 

The Ventura County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved the ban on Tuesday, according to the Ventura County Star.

It’s not the first time brakeless fixies have been a target of local law. In 2006 Portland, Oregon bike messenger Ayla Holland was stopped for riding a brakeless fixie, and subsequently fined.

In a similar later case in Portland, the rider managed to argue that the transmission constituted a braking mechanism and escaped a fine, but for a while some Portland police were believed to be deliberately targetting riders of brakeless fixies.

In 2010, Australian bike shops were threatened with fines of up to AUD1.1 million for selling fixies without two brakes.

In the UK, the law is straightforward. The Pedal Cycles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1983 say that a fixed wheel bike has to have a front brake, and regular bikes with freewheels have to have two independent braking systems, one of which operates on the front wheel.

We haven’t been able to find any cases of someone being fined in the UK for riding a brakeless fixie.

John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.

He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.

Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for CyclingNews.com. Along with road.cc founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for BikeRadar.com and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.

John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of TotalWomensCycling.com before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.

He joined road.cc in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.

Add new comment

46 comments

Avatar
Ush replied to flobble | 10 years ago
0 likes
flobble wrote:
giff77 wrote:
oozaveared wrote:

Funnily enough though some old American bikes used to have a freewheel with a brake that came on of you pedalled backwards. I rode one once back in the 60s. Quite a good system I thought. Anyone know if they are still around or what they are called?

Yep, they're still around. Mainly on kids bikes though. My friends youngster has this set up on his and takes great joy in locking the rear wheel to show his prowess on braking. Can't think what they're called right now

Coaster brakes, I think.

No brakes=no brain (metaphorically) = sooner or later, no brain (literally).

Back brake better than no brake
Front brake better than rear brake (more friction under braking)
Two brakes better than one brake

Nobody looks hip with 2 tons of car resting on the remains of their brains.

FFS, they're calling for a complete ban on fixed-wheel bicycles. Not for a ban on brakeless bicycles.

It's a evidence-free, kneejerk reaction which ignores the fact that a fixed-wheel with a front-brake (which provides c. 85% of the stopping power) is possibly safer than a freewheel in terms of sensing road conditions, having a direct incentive not to bomb down hills faster than your legs can pedal etc.

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to giff77 | 10 years ago
0 likes
giff77 wrote:
oozaveared wrote:

Funnily enough though some old American bikes used to have a freewheel with a brake that came on of you pedalled backwards. I rode one once back in the 60s. Quite a good system I thought. Anyone know if they are still around or what they are called?

Yep, they're still around. Mainly on kids bikes though. My friends youngster has this set up on his and takes great joy in locking the rear wheel to show his prowess on braking. Can't think what they're called right now

Coaster brakes - also popular on bikes in Germany and Holland where they're still on sale. A lot of those old sit up type Dutch bikes have them still.

Avatar
Ush replied to oozaveared | 10 years ago
0 likes
oozaveared wrote:

bikes used to have a freewheel with a brake that came on of you pedalled backwards. I rode one once back in the 60s. Quite a good system I thought. Anyone know if they are still around or what they are called?

Coaster brakes. All the "C" ending models in the Sunrace/Sturmey-Archer catalogue have it. http://www.sturmey-archer.com/products/hubs/cid/3/id/15.html

Avatar
Paul J replied to oozaveared | 10 years ago
0 likes

oozaveared: Kick-back / pedal-backwards / coaster brakes are fitted on pretty much the majority (nearly all?) of "normal" (i.e. not sports) bikes in the Netherlands.

They're excellent for about-town, utility cycling because they mean your hands are left free, to signal, carry things (e.g. shopping), use your mobile, etc. The downside is they're not the most powerful brakes.  3

Avatar
mrkeith119 replied to oozaveared | 10 years ago
0 likes
oozaveared wrote:

I would have to agree that a fixie without a front brake is not road sensible and ought not to be road legal.

I could be mistaken but it isn't road legal in the UK, I'm sure the highway code states that a bike needs to have both front and rear brakes. so you would need a front brake with a fixed transmission.

Avatar
Large_Pista replied to oozaveared | 10 years ago
0 likes

They were/are called "coaster brakes" – I had one on my Schwinn Stingray: http://goo.gl/3rwy1J

Avatar
ferguzz replied to oozaveared | 10 years ago
0 likes
Avatar
mrmo | 10 years ago
0 likes

seems odd to ban fixies when the issue is brakes, what are they going to do about bmx's being ridden brakeless??? or do skate shoes and back tyres count as a brake????

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to mrmo | 10 years ago
0 likes
mrmo wrote:

seems odd to ban fixies when the issue is brakes, what are they going to do about bmx's being ridden brakeless??? or do skate shoes and back tyres count as a brake????

A lot of riders on the BMX scene ride brakeless. I've asked a few about it. The usual response is, "Brakes drag and slow you down."

I answer, "They don't drag if you know how to set them up right."

So there you have it, teenage laziness in setting up brakes leads to minimalist cool. The saving in avoiding the cost of a functioning brake is outweighed by the rapid wear of each pair of Vans.

My BMXs have a rear brake. It's enough.

Avatar
oozaveared replied to OldRidgeback | 10 years ago
0 likes

to be fair the kids on the BMXs have a partial point. Much like a proper track bike they aren't really for riding on a road and. OK if someone is riding a BMX on a road maybe they should have a brake. I bet they can stop em faster than a lot of cyclists can with brakes. And it's not fair to call it teenage laziness. It's more about wanting the cache. Quite the opposite in fact. They probably had to take the brake off. And as it happens the lazy ones aren't riding BMXs around they are playing Tony Hawke on the PS3.

Avatar
russyparkin | 10 years ago
0 likes

hipsters spitting their skinny machiatos all over their rapha city gloves everywhere.

Avatar
jason.timothy.jones replied to russyparkin | 10 years ago
0 likes
russyparkin wrote:

hipsters spitting their skinny machiatos all over their rapha city gloves everywhere.

I wish I was cool enough to be a hipster, im just to old, to fat for skinny jeans, I can grow a decent beard, but being a read head it does not look the part, especially with my bald head....but I do have a fixie

Avatar
KnightBiker | 10 years ago
0 likes

I ride a fixie on the velodrome of Amsterdam, but on open roads I wouldn't dare it. (on a velodrome brakes would even be dangerous and it's one way traffic anyway.)
I know there's a lot of cyclist capable of doing so, but being capable en needing to do so is bit of a difference. at least in my mind it wouldn't hurt to put at least one break on a streetbike. (one is at least free not to use it...)
(Instead of fixed gear, in town I ride singlespeed, makes me feel more save during cornering also, being able to keep the pedal high and lean into the corner.)

(don't think it needs to be a law, it's just a case of awarding Darwin awards)

Avatar
allez neg | 10 years ago
0 likes

I don't think it's unreasonable to decree that bikes should have brakes regardless of transmission type.

You can stop a car or (4 stroke) motorcycle on engine braking if you are skilful, but I'd prefer not to share the roads with unbraked vee-hickles, ta.

Avatar
jason.timothy.jones | 10 years ago
0 likes

so if I ride around on a fixie and stab someone in the face, the fixie is the problem? Sounds like they have British Politicians in Cali

Avatar
guidob | 10 years ago
0 likes

the Ventura County Star lacks details - is it fixed gear or fixed gear with no brakes that have been banned?

I ride fixed for my commute but I do have a front brake (as I have no confidence in my ability to stop the bike sharp enough) then again I am in West London and not California...

Pages

Latest Comments