A motorist with an “extraordinarily high” drink drive reading after downing vodka from a 7Up bottle has avoided jail for crashing into a cyclist, instead receiving a five-year driving ban and a €1,500 fine after pleading guilty to drunk and careless driving.
Rebecca Griffith, 34, of Blackheath Park, Dublin, was heading toward Artane in her Opel Astra when she struck the 34-year-old cyclist riding in the bus/cycle lane from behind on the city’s Malahide Road. The impact sent him flying over the handlebars and ended up on the road.
Another cyclist assisted him in getting up. He suffered bruising and a concussion from the collision and was taken to the hospital in an ambulance, where he underwent a CAT scan and received a tetanus injection.
The injuries caused the cyclist to miss work for two weeks, and his expenses were €700. In a victim impact statement, he said he was now nervous while cycling, felt vulnerable on the roads, and suffered from occasional flashbacks, while also suffering from ongoing pain and discomfort.
> Taxi driver avoids assault conviction for pushing cyclist who called him a “p***k” after dangerous close pass – because judge said driver was “taken aback by bad language”
Griffiths, who works as an environmental scientist at Trinity College, had finished work at 3pm on 17 August 2023, the day of the incident and was visiting her sister. After a row broke out, Griffith purchased a bottle of vodka and poured it into a 7Up bottle, which she drank from while behind the wheel of her car.
Police officers immediately noticed in the aftermath of the crash that Griffith had consumed alcohol; the sample she provided revealed a reading of 407mg of alcohol per 100ml of urine — over six times the legal limit of 67mg in Ireland.
> Red-light jumping truck driver already disqualified from driving imprisoned for 21 months for severely injuring elderly cyclist
DublinLive reports that the defence counsel Emmett Nolan told Judge Grainne Malone his client was lucky not to have caused serious injury and was facing a more severe charge. The defence acknowledged the drink-drive reading was quite “extraordinarily high”, and it had been obvious to gardaí in the aftermath that she had consumed alcohol.
Mr Nolan stressed that although his client was “highly educated and travelled”, she suffered from a bad alcohol addiction and had been drinking the night before the incident. On the day of the collision, she had been working, surveying at Trinity College, and finished at 3 o’clock.
A letter from her doctor confirmed she was on antidepressant medication. Counsel explained that the driver’s drinking problem began several years ago when she worked in a well-known late-night eatery in Dublin, and staff would have drinks after closing time.
> Driver drinking vodka from 7Up bottle in car crashes into cyclist on bike lane while six times over drink drive limit – and offers victim €2,500 as “token of remorse”
The court heard she used alcohol as a coping mechanism, but her family hoped that she would abstain from drinking and engage with services to help her deal with the issue. Pleading for leniency, the barrister had asked the court to treat it as an aberration by a young woman who made a significant error in her life but otherwise had a lot going for her.
Griffith had no previous convictions and was going to counselling. Ahead of sentencing, a probation report was ordered along with a request for information about the compensation awarded in the civil proceedings.
At a previous hearing in October, the driver also issued an unreserved apology through her barrister and in a letter brought to court, and offered the cyclist €2,500 as a “token of remorse”.
Add new comment
15 comments
Tbh my main issue here is why the ban doesn't also include medical restrictions
I.e. getting a licence back in 5 years should require suitable medical professional confirming alcoholism is under control (and or alcohol interlocks on vehicles etc)
And that any driving while disqualified = long term jail sentence (though this should apply to all cases, as well as automatically being considered a risk for bail etc as they have proven they won't obey courts...)
The sentence does seem rather light. I hope the victim sues the driver heavily and wins a massive payout. The insurance firm would cover this but it'd then make it very hard for the driver to get insurance cover again. You do have to ask whether lifetime driving bans should be introduced for people so irresponsible as this.
"Pleading for leniency, the barrister had asked the court to treat it as an aberration by a young woman"
She's 34 FFS!
A sad case, and one with no winners. The driver can thank her lucky stars that the cyclist wasn't more seriously injured and that the court was sympathetic to her illness, and perhaps this is the wake up call that could change her life.
The cyclist suffers from nerves around traffic and flashbacks, and we can only hope that they fully recover in time, but an horrific experience, as I know myself. They can at least get recompense for their injuries and any continuing treatment.
Is it any wonder that drink driving is still a problem when the police do nothing even with clear evidence like this:
https://youtu.be/hw071PAofHQ
Not really relevant though.... the above story is from a different country.
Probably celebrated not being sent to jail though.
Amazed she wasn't given a gentler slap on the wrist. Ireland is fantastically poor at taking dangerous driving seriously.
I have sympathy with alcoholics. Both my parents were alcoholics, one essentially dying from it and one who beat it.
But.... the driving thing takes away any sorrow I feel for this criminal. Should be a custodial sentence, even if only for a week in a horrid facility. That would be more of a deterrent than the old slapped wrist and a ban.
Quite - alcoholics are suffering from a disease. However choosing to drive whilst drunk is a purely selfish thing to do and anyone who does that needs to be locked up to protect the public from them.
The alcoholism should have no bearing on this case, positive or negatively.
The crime is the lack of consideration for any other life by operating a motor vehicle under the influence.
What should impact negatively is that she knowingly attempted to hide her alcohol consumption by disguising the drink in a 7Up bottle. Regardless of whether she was trying to hide her compulsion to drink, or the act of drink driving specifically, by decanting into another bottle demonstrates that she understood what she was doing was wrong and continued regardless.
People have the choice to drink OR drive, if addiction compels her to the former, she made the choice to drive illegally anyway
One thing that bothers me is the use of antidepressant med and driving, it never gets picked up by police. Most of these types of medicines state on the prescription do not drive or use heavy machinery whilst using.
Not correct - most commonly prescribed SSRI's dont impact driving and impaired ability is a fairly rare side effect.
From experience of being prescribed citalopram there is an advisory caution for driving and using machinery in that reactions may be impaired. I do both without any impairment with the only side effect of lightheartedness and little impulse shocks if I don't take them as prescribed i.e. forget to take them over a couple of days. Obviously others may react differently to that and different medications
Disagree - its fundamentally what this case is about - her choices were quite clearly the habits of an habitual addict.
She in a properly working society she should be offered the choice of a custodial sentence or a residential alcohol addiction course.