John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.
He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.
Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for CyclingNews.com. Along with road.cc founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for BikeRadar.com and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.
John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of TotalWomensCycling.com before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.
He joined road.cc in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.
Add new comment
9 comments
Cycling on the GBW is pure joy, 14 miles of bliss. Up there with the Dutch cycle network. Away from the busy A14, quiet and no traffic pollution. No way would cycling adjacent to a major new A14 be preferable to riding the GBW. Swavesey is already served by the GBW. Why not make new cycle paths adjacent to railway lines instead?
More importantly the GBW at Milton north of Cambridge needs to be linked with the route running south to Addenbrookes.
Well, this is living proof some people will believe anything you tell them.
The cost of adding the cycleway is going to be a negligible part of a £1.5 billion project, and presumably this shouldn't reduce any other cycling budget, so I don't think cost comes into it. Plus "It will run alongside the single carriageway local access road" so it isn't some blue paint next to the juggernauts. If this sets a trend for similar additions to other road builds/improvements it must be a good thing?
I agree that the villages to the north of the A14 are already well served by the existing busway but I could see this opening up places like Bar Hill that are completely cut off (cycling-wise)
Ah, interesting that you mention Bar Hill as I go there by bike to see my daughter play football. You can get there through a path from Dry Drayton and then by Madingley and the path down Madingley Road or you can go across the roundabout and then down through Longstanton, Oakington, Girton, which is rather a detour. A path that side of the A14 might get a bit of use but it would be pretty unpleasant to use given the pollution levels near that road and upgrading the way out of Bar Hill to Dry Drayton, which isn't very good, would be better in the short term at least. But in the article it mentions Swavesey, which is very near the guided busway.
Bar Hill is undoubtedly a car ghetto and does need some better cycle routes out of it, especially to the Histon Road/Milton Road side of Cambridge where a lot of people work, Science Park etc. But to be honest if you work in that area and want to cycle to work you wouldn't live in Bar Hill. Access to the city centre is far more direct by the Dry Drayton route and just needs a bit of tarmac to improve it.
There is already the bike path on the guided busway which can take you to town via Histon or Girton with hardly any danger, although you do have to cross sides a few times for some strange reason. Condition of guided busway path is near perfect and it is easily accessible to all the villages in the area and gets a fair bit of use for commuting and riding/training. I use it a lot as it's a nice ride up to St Ives and some other places. Absolutely no point spending a fortune making a path near a noisy, polluted road when you can go down a quiet, pleasant path in the countryside.
There's a lot of money sloshing around Cambridge for cycle projects but the people in charge don't seem to have a clue how to use it.
awesome! now do this on the Scottish A9 dualling and A96 dualling instead of the "we will ensure adequate provision for cyclists at appropriate junction areas" and then follow up with a "insufficient funds" excuse when the details plans come out showing no provision (apart from having to make us go around it with a 5k detour)
If it isn't a shared path I will be surprised (if it happens at all).
Awesome if they include a cleaning/clearing budget for it that is meaningful. More than once per year Cambs Highways else it will be a white elephant in 6 months covered in bottles of lorry drivers pee, rubbish and broken glass.
Awesome! Long overdue, and just a shame we will have to wait for another 6+ years