Despite successful implementation across Europe and in London, and widespread approval during recent planning consultation, it doesn’t look like segregated bike lanes and ‘floating’ bus stops will be coming to Cambridge any time soon. Councillors yesterday postponed a decision on a implementing a £1.8 million bike path project citing concerns about “kamikaze” cyclists.
Cambridgeshire County Council’s were debating plans for improved cycling facilities on Hills Road and Huntingdon Road, but called for revised plans to be submitted in July, despite warnings from council officers that Government funding for the scheme had to be spent by May.
Chris Havergal of Cambridge News reports that councillors expressed concern that the proposed floating bus stops, which allow cyclists to safely pass stationary busses, would be a hazard for pedestrians who would have to cross cycle lanes to board and disembark.
Red lights
John Williams, Liberal Democrat councillor for Fulbourn, said: “I can’t tell you how often I see cyclists disobeying red lights and not stopping at pedestrians crossings and pelican crossings.
“I don’t have any confidence cyclists will give way to pedestrians moving to the bus stop because of what I see going on in this city with cyclists.
“Unless we make pedestrians the priority at these bus stops, I have serious concerns there will be an accident.”
Kamikaze cyclists
Williams’ fellow Liberal Democrat, David Jenkins, councillor for Histon, said: “I’m concerned about cyclists’ behaviour. It’s only a small minority, but it’s a significant small minority of kamikaze cyclists in the city and they are intolerant of other road users, and there has to be some way of policing them.
“Simply allowing them to have priority means less confident bus users will be stranded on the island as these guys go past.”
However, Jenkins later wrote on his blog that he was nevertheless in favour of the plans. He voted against the postponement of the decision, which he described as “an unnecessary cop-out.”
Common sense
Independent John Hipkin, councillor for the Castle ward which includes Huntingdon Road, said bus users would be able to make sense of island stops.
He said: “No traffic scheme can entirely discount common sense and every traffic scheme relies on common sense to make it work.
“I think this is a project which, on balance, I support. I fully support some of the misgiving of my residents but on balance I shall support it.”
Frustrating
Cambridge Cycling Campaign described councillors’ decision as “very frustrating”.
Martin Lucas-Smith, the organisation’s chairman, had told the committee that floating bus stops had been used across Europe and elsewhere in the UK with no major problems.
He added: “These schemes are crucial if Cambridge isn’t to grind to a halt. It isn’t about giving cyclists favours, it’s encouraging more people to cycle.”
Add new comment
38 comments
I am also looking forward to permanent pedestrian green at all traffic lights in the city, where cars have to trigger the light changes to cross, since they're suddenly all for pedestrian priority.
Actually...
I don't even follow the bizarre logic of these councillors. Cyclists won't stop for pedestrians, so we'll design the bus stops so that pedestrians can expect them to stop when they don't? How does that work?
I can’t tell you how often I see motorists speeding, disobeying red lights, not stopping at pedestrians crossings and using mobile phones while driving.
In Glasgow city I am absolutely sure that motorists are the number 1 red light jumpers around. I'm also sure that, across the UK, *all* speeding is done by motorists - causing considerable danger to other road users. Further, the overwhelming majority of serious injuries and fatalities on our roads involve motor vehicles. Very often poor driving by the motor vehicle operator is a major - if not *sole* - factor in these KSIs.
Yet somehow, motorists are not their own worst enemies.
Once again, cyclists are their own worst enemies...
We're about to spend £1.5 billion on an upgrade of the A14 just beyond Huntingdon Road, one of the roads in this scheme. Want to guess how often dangerous overtaking, tailgating, changing lane without indicating and speeding have been mentioned as arguments against the upgrade?
No, myths and prejudice are the enemy.
Hundreds of thousands of car drivers break road rules every day - sometimes with devastating consequences: they are responsible for almost all of the death and serious injury on our roads - and the rest of us have to live with the aftermath.
In spite of this, drivers don't appear to have any trouble getting new infrastructure on which to drive (according to gov.uk more than 200 projects, the majority of them roads, are due to start construction in 2014 to 2015).
I've never heard of a local authority refusing to build roads unless drivers start to obey the rules.
Indeed, just replace the word Cyclists with Motorists in the councilors' comments!
So buses and cars will continue to be delayed because of the worry that bus passengers won't look before crossing back to the pavement? I suppose it's also cyclists' fault that the M25 is so often a carpark & petrol costs so much!
Pages