John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.
He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.
Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for CyclingNews.com. Along with road.cc founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for BikeRadar.com and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.
John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of TotalWomensCycling.com before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.
He joined road.cc in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.
Add new comment
17 comments
Is there any point worrying about the safty aspect of this helmet? Any adverts for current helmets I've seen lately focus on looks, low weight, aerodynamics and ventilation with very little comment on safety (I've just seen one that mentions temple protection and that's all the safety details it gives).
"Starck believes helmets for e-bikes (more accurately Electric-Assist Pedal Cycles or EAPC) need to be more like motorbike helmets"
Why? Electric assist means that the bike has an electric motor to ASSIST in moving you along - you still need to pedal. For this reason the requirement for ventilation/cooling (or keeping warm when the temparature drops) is more similar to when cycling.
As a bike helmet NO flying an X wing fighter in a galaxy far far away YES
technically not an x-wing but you're on the right lines:
http://mylifeasboy.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/rebel-fleet-trooper1.jpg
Glad I'm not the only cynical one here. Starcke's a Stylist not a Designer. Designers make things work; Stylists make them look pretty.
Good designers also make things look desirable after they've made them work. REALLY talented designers find the two inseparable.
Even after all these years, Starcke is still just a stylist. (Have you ever tried to USE that lemon squeezer???)
The French ISP 'Free' got starck to design their modem - it has little ventilation and overheats but it does look good, at least before meltdown. This helmet seems to suffer the same problems.
Remember he designed that lemon squeezer that looked like a rocket. Fin.
Looks great as a work of art, I really like it.
As helmet, it's a bit shit and I wouldn't wear it.
The visor needs to be mirrored.
Should I fear I am about to be pithed, I will be sure to reach for this one forthwith.
Perhaps it's just me, maybe I'm not fully into the design ethic, but if I wanted to design a helmet that needed to be closer to the ergonomics that resemble more and more those of the motorcycle, I'd start with a motorcycle helmet...
...not an aluminium pisspot with a cork lining, however sustainable that lining might be.
John Cooper Clarke wrote a poem about this kind of person, can you guess the title?
Well I think it looks quite cool. Why all the down on Starck? He's done plenty of good stuff. His Excalibur bog brush was a classic
If it passes the necessary safety criteria then why not?
I reckon it would be a fairly safe bet that it wouldn't pass any sort of certification for any kind of safety head wear but then that's not the point of it.
Some of the stuff he does is fun but it's not really design. At best it's product styling and tends to have the whiff of something scribbled on an envelope and then handed to someone else to actually make into a manufacturable object.
I was a bit surprised to see he's still operating really, he's a bit of a relic from the 90s but obviously Giro think the name still carries some cachet.
Well I need a new bog brush, so does Excalibur work - whats it like handling sprayed on dryed out diarrhea and whats it like shifting those clingy bits that hug the waterline and just don't shift no matter how much elbow grease.
He likes a good laugh that Philippe Starck.
The Emperors New Helmet, brought to you from the man who can't design a lemon squeezer.
Why are people still patronising this bloke? He's never given a toss about function, he's all about the form and the fashion.
Note the nice rigid 'peak' to add extra leverage to your neck if you land face first. C'est une cruche de merde.