A body chaired by New Forest District Council (NFDC) is calling on the organisers of two cycling events due to take place in the area the weekend after next not to hold their events on the same day unless they can ensure that there is no clash between routes and timings. In July, the same body, the New Forest Safety Advisory Group (SAG), confirmed to the New Forest’s Verderers’ Court that the two events in question would not clash.
The SAG co-ordinates the activities of organisations including NFDC, Hampshire County Council and the emergency services to provide safety advice to organisers of events in the area, which besides sports might include music festivals, fireworks displays and street parties.
In a statement, it says that “amid safety concerns” it is concerned about what it believes is a clash on Sunday 12 October between the CTC Wessex Gridiron 100 randonnée event, with 1,000 participants, and the second day of the Wiggle New Forest 100 event, in which up to 1,900 riders will participate.
It says: “There are fears that cyclists travelling in opposite directions at the same time on the Gorley road from Fordingbridge to Ringwood, and on Ornamental Drive, Brockenhurst, to Roger Penny Way in Bramshaw, will cause severe traffic congestion and safety issues, as well as a negative impact on the communities where the routes clash.”
The document was circulated on Twitter today, initially by local cycling campaigner New Forest Cyclist, and has come to light after a weekend on which four cyclists were taken to hospital with serious injuries after collisions with motor vehicles in the New Forest.
Some users of the social network pointed out that the minutes of July’s session of the Verderers’ Court, which has jurisdiction over a variety of issues in the New Forest, revealed that the clerk to the court advised it “that the New Forest Safety Advisory Group has confirmed that the Gridiron event and the Wiggle will not clash.”
The same session of the court also heard that with a livestock drift due to take place in the New Forest on Sunday 12 October, UK Cycling Events had amended its route so as to remove any conflict, and the company was thanked for its co-operation.
In its latest statement, the SAG’s chairman, James Knight, said: “Due to the representations we have received from members of the group, we can only advise against both events taking place on the same day with the routes and timings as currently advertised.
“The SAG is committed to helping promote safety for events that are held in the district. The organisers themselves have a duty to liaise with each other to resolve the issue and we have strongly encouraged them to do so,” he added.
The SAG stops short of calling on the organisations not to use those roads – rather, it wants them to ensure both events aren’t in the same place at the same time.
But adding to the ire of local cyclists on Twitter is the fact that Rhinefield Ornamental Drive is, as we reported last week, the road that the New Forest National Park Authority intends to resurface using £1.275 million of the money earmarked by the Department for Transport to develop cycling in the area.
That money was intended to be used, among other things, for a cycle hire scheme in the New Forest which has now been scrapped.
Martin Barden of Wiggle New Forest 100 organisers UK Cycling Events told road.cc: “We are currently working with CTC Wessex the organisers of the Gridiron to minimise any impact of our events running on the same day.”
Add new comment
35 comments
Well this could get interesting - from the article:
"The speed enforcement officer, who is dedicated to the New Forest, will be using a new infrared speed camera to catch speeding motorists after dark."
You say that, but give it a couple of weeks and the new forest parish council will redirect this office to dealing with "real" problems like 2 cyclists daring to be on the same bit of road at the same time or generally getting in the way of motor vehicles be able to travel as fast as they possibly can at all times.
These are the really issues the people of the forest want addressing.....
Anyway I throught it was cycllists that killed all these animals, wasnt that there reason for want to ban people from riding bikes in the forest.
I was about to propose an immediate ban on all multi direction roads due to the risks involved, in fact extend this to footpaths. Multi directional anything is just foolhardy.
Imagine two people walking in opposite directions, thats an inevitable crash right there. All transportation from now on should be through carefully planned one way systems. Will no one think of the children!
I agree that these multi-directional roads are a real problem and should be banned. When I cycle to work every day, I'm always faced by a barrage of cyclists travelling in the opposite direction who are simply unable to work out which side of the road they're supposed to be on. It's a proper free-for-all. Lucky we have the SAG to tell us what's safe when riding in a non-closed environment.
I don't know what the New forest Nimbys are complaining about now - if both sportives are using the road on the same day, then you can hit both with only on packet of tacks - saves money and effort.
If 'traffic congestion' is a safety issue now, then they really need to start preventing cars from entering the New Forest....
Pages