Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Unfair that Armstrong took the brunt of the blame, says Sean Yates

Tinkoff-Saxo directeur sportif says that Contador and Froome are ‘a level above’ Nibali

Former Discovery Channel and Team Sky sporting director, Sean Yates, has told the BBC that Lance Armstrong was ‘a big figure that they hunted down’ and says he feels it is unfair that Armstrong has taken ‘the brunt of the publicity and the brunt of the blame’.

In 2013, Armstrong himself claimed: “I have experienced massive personal loss, massive loss of wealth while others have truly capitalised on this story.” Yates, a team-mate of Armstrong’s at Motorola and also a member of the American’s Discovery management team from 2005, appears to have some sympathy with this point of view.

“Lance was a big figure that they hunted down, along with others obviously, but he was the stand-out figure and he took the brunt of the publicity and the brunt of the blame – unfairly in my opinion. Ultimately people will make up their own minds somewhere down the road, but that may be a few years to come yet.”

Yates was one of three high profile members of Team Sky to leave the Tour de France-winning team after their zero-tolerance approach to doping was restated in the wake of the Lance Armstrong affair in 2012. While Bobby Julich and Steven De Jongh left after admitting doping during the late 1990s, Yates said he was retiring from cycling for personal and health reasons.

Yates has denied any knowledge of the systematic doping detailed in the United States Anti-Doping Agency’s (USADA) 2012 reasoned decision. However, while he was not named in the evidence, he does appear in a photo listed as Exhibit A with Frankie Andreu’s affidavit in which he has his arm around the shoulders of "Motoman" (face redacted) outside the Stars 'n' Bikes bike shop.

Yates, Julich and de Jongh have since been reunited at Oleg Tinkov’s Tinkoff-Saxo team. Yates is working as one of the team's sport directors, the same role he performed in 2012 at Sky as part of a team that secured Sir Bradley Wiggins’ Tour de France victory. He is expected to return to the Tour de France in 2015 to aid Alberto Contador’s bid.

Yates describes both Contador and Team Sky’s Chris Froome as being ‘a level above’ last year’s winner, Vincenzo Nibali. “Hopefully they both stay on their bikes this year and it’s a good clean fight, and may the best man win.”

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

39 comments

Avatar
Simon E replied to Kadinkski | 9 years ago
0 likes
Kadinkski wrote:

It was started by Lance Armstrong with the purpose of beating cancer. Nearly *every cent* went into funding cancer research projects. I think it was about 2003 or 2004 when they began to phase out the research and morph into a 'supportive' role - which is all it does nowadays.

I wonder how many people actually 'beat' cancer thanks to Livestrong money and their yellow wristbands.

Lance talked about "beating" cancer. I think "surviving" would be more accurate.

If anyone is interested in the somewhat murky finances of Livestrong then you could start here:
http://fraudbytes.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/lance-armstrong-investigation.html

Also found this:

Quote:

Although Livestrong reports that 82 cents of every dollar raised goes to programs, services and grants, that number actually includes staff salaries, lobbying costs and legal fees.

Livestrong’s 2011 IRS tax return show it put $13 million in the bank in a rainy-day fund that year, bringing its cash on hand up to a staggering $103 million, an unusually large amount, charity experts told CBS. That same year, the charity gave $5.2 million — 11 cents on the dollar — for grants to help cancer survivors

Why does an organisation need $103m stowed away in the bank?

Avatar
ianrobo | 9 years ago
0 likes

you have won the internet today with that !

Avatar
Some Fella | 9 years ago
0 likes

"I think we should all stop giving Jimmy Saville a hard time" - Gary Glitter

Avatar
Beefy replied to Some Fella | 9 years ago
0 likes

I don't think comparing animals who have sexually assaulted children to cheating cyclist is in good taste. I get you point about hypocrisy but I think the analogy is a bit mistaken

Avatar
ianrobo | 9 years ago
0 likes

It is variation on 'all of us were doing it' . Is Yates a known doper claiming other riders had positive tests covered up by the UCI ?

Did other riders call whistle blowers was it prositute ?

Or did he say a journo trying uncover it was only doing because of his dead son ?

Avatar
andyp | 9 years ago
0 likes

Armstrong's mates in sticking up for their friend shocker.

Avatar
Hamster | 9 years ago
0 likes

No Sean, it's not unfair.

Avatar
handlebarcam | 9 years ago
0 likes

Poor old Sean. He's obviously dropped off Lance's speed dial list, hence he hadn't got the message that, thanks to the recent automotive incident, the concerted effort to rehabilitate his old boss in the eyes of the public has had to be put on hold, for now.

Avatar
Paul J | 9 years ago
0 likes

Yeah, it's definitely unfair, many other riders have managed to escape much of the blame they're due and kept their jobs in the industry. Like, oh, Sean Yates.

However, if we had the principle that we couldn't rightly blame one person for their wrongs unless we also ensured everyone else who'd done similar wrongs also received the blame they were due, then we'd never get anywhere. You could never discipline anyone for anything then. This is just self-interested sophistry from Sean Yates.

Pages

Latest Comments