A woman who deleted a record of a phone call she had made while driving after hitting a cyclist has been convicted of causing his death.
Julie Watson, aged 36 and from Kinross, hit cyclist Alistair Speed on the A91, near Gateside in Fife, in September 2013, reports BBC News.
The victim died from severe head injuries, with his sister, Mhairi Laffoley, saying his death had caused a "horrendous" effect on their family.
She said: "My parents died within 12 weeks of the accident."
She added that her brother was “a very, very competent cyclist" who was "very steady” and “didn't take risks."
Judge Lord Kinclaven remanded Watson in custody pending sentencing next month.
He told her: "In the circumstances I am not satisfied bail should be continued."
He added: "The use of a mobile phone, especially calling out, is a conscious, wilful act. The use of a phone when driving, a hand-held phone, is an offence."
The verdict comes in the same week that a survey from road safety charity IAM found that illegal use of hand held mobile phones is the greatest concern that drivers have about other motorists.
Add new comment
34 comments
Lets hope that Judge Lord Kinclaven follows up with an appropriate lengthy sentence, it looks likely considering his comments and his removal of bail.
My guess is 2 years jail time.
I think longer. That's why bail was refused. This is a level 1 offence of Causing death by DD
Nature of offence: Level 1
The most serious offences encompassing driving that involved a deliberate decision to ignore (or a flagrant disregard for) the rules of the road and an apparent disregard for the great danger being caused to others
Starting point: 8 years custody
Sentencing range: 7-14 years custody
The starting point therefore is 8 years and the judge then looks at any mitigating factors or aggravating factors that either will reduce the sentence or lengthen it. The offence was making an outgoing call on a hand held mobile. That makes it Level 1. An aggravating factor is the deletion of the call record on her mobile. That's perverting the course of justice.
No mitigating factors have been mentioned in the article so I don't know but I doubt she'd be remanded if there were. The sentence is likely to be 9 - 10 years. It doesn't say if she pleaded guilty or when. So there might be 25% discount or not. But even then that would put it in the range of 7 years.
Fat chance. Courts DO hand out sentences that are shorter than the minimum in the guidelines.
Maybe the sentence should be 10 years, or maybe more!
However, I bet the sentence is around 5 years, or less. I predict an outbreak of "genuine remorse" being used as an excuse to cut the sentence.
Pages