With London's £2bn Silvertown Tunnel opening this week and cyclists not allowed to ride through, the controversial bike bus that is to shuttle bicycle riders across the route has also been rolled out.
The idea that cyclists must, rather than be provided a suitable direct route to ride between Greenwich south of the river and Newham to the north, catch a bus before resuming their cycled journeys on the other side was already branded "ridiculous" by campaigners when the plans were announced.
April 2025 Silvertown Tunnel bike bus first day (credit: Tony at Bikesky - Bikesy.co.uk)
Accusations of "greenwashing" have been prominent throughout, the Silvertown Tunnel project reportedly costing in excess of £2bn but lacking an option for cyclists that does not either involve a massively longer journey or taking your bike on a bus that then drives through the tunnel. Criticism peaked when it emerged in January that the cost of the bike bus — which will be free to use for "for at least 12 months" and will run five times an hour from 6.30am to 9.30pm, seven days a week — will be £2m.
But what's it actually like to use? With the route now open, one local cyclist, Tony from cycling deals website Bikesy, went along to try it out on its first day in operation.
April 2025 Silvertown Tunnel bike bus first day (credit: Tony at Bikesky - Bikesy.co.uk)
Sharing plenty of helpful pictures illustrating what the service is like, Tony told us: "The spaces are quite cramped, [the capacity of] eight regular bikes may not be enough in peak times. The cycle paths from central Greenwich to the bus stop on Millennium Way could also be improved, but the cycle infrastructure on the north side is good.
April 2025 Silvertown Tunnel bike bus first day (credit: Tony at Bikesky - Bikesy.co.uk)
"The bus service itself is pleasant, but a far cry from the cycle route under the Thames that cycling groups were calling for. It was encouraging to see that UK street-legal e-bikes are allowed on the bus, despite TfL's recent ban on taking full-size e-bikes on public transport. People were using it to carry Santander bikes, Santander e-bikes and Lime Bikes across the river on the first services of the day.
> "A huge setback for active travel": Non-foldable e-bikes to be banned from most Transport for London services to "ensure safety of customers and staff"
"The tunnel service is handy for people going to the Excel Centre and Canary Wharf, saving the inconvenience of walking through the Greenwich foot tunnels, and potentially having to carry a bike up the stairs in the event of a broken lift.
April 2025 Silvertown Tunnel bike bus first day (credit: Tony at Bikesky - Bikesy.co.uk)
"Traffic in the tunnel was minimal and, with a separate bus lane the whole way along, the interval of one bus every 12 minutes looks encouraging and feasible. There are three buses on the loop at any one time, with two more available as replacements in the event of any breakdowns."
April 2025 Silvertown Tunnel bike bus first day (credit: Tony at Bikesky - Bikesy.co.uk)
The buses are run by Stagecoach who made a successful £1,967,010 bid to Transport for London (TfL) for the contract to operate the shuttle service.
April 2025 Silvertown Tunnel bike bus first day (credit: Tony at Bikesky - Bikesy.co.uk)
The bike bus and wider Silvertown Tunnel project have attracted consistent criticism from cycling and active travel groups for its failure to provide an alternative route to pedestrians and cyclists, all while potentially encouraging car use and increasing pollution.
April 2025 Silvertown Tunnel bike bus first day (credit: Tony at Bikesky - Bikesy.co.uk)
There is a 'north' stop location that will be located on Seagull Lane in Newham, close to Royal Victoria DLR station, and the 'south' stop in Greenwich located on Millennium Way near the junction with Old School Close. Concerns had already been heard about the bus stop locations and a lack of safe cycling infrastructure leading to them, Tony's account suggesting this is particularly poor on the southern side.
The controversy around the tunnel and its cycling offering has been long-running. In October, an FOI request revealed that RideLondon's "hiatus" in 2025 was due to the tunnel's opening, London's walking and cycling commissioner objecting to the closure of the new tunnel for the cycling event as an "absolute no".
RideLondon-Essex route 2024 with impact of Silvertown Tunnel opening (London Marathon Events) (credit: road.cc)
More concerning for cycling campaigners however is the impact the new tunnel, which will see car drivers charged £4 to use at peak times, will have on traffic levels and emissions.
At the time the bike bus was announced there was much discussion about it on social media, one user calling the idea "ridiculous". Another called it "embarrassing" that London is "a city which cannot afford to build a dedicated bridge or tunnel for cycles and pedestrians, but dedicates countless billions to new infrastructure for more cars".
> "You can't polish a climate turd, but you can sprinkle it with active travel glitter": Cyclists slam proposals for 'bike bus' through controversial tunnel as "bikewashing"
Victoria Rance, a local teacher and the founder of the Stop the Silvertown Tunnel Coalition, commented: "This is 2023. The climate is at a tipping point. We must reduce car use by 27-40 per cent according to London Mayor Sadiq Khan's own carbon plan. So putting bikes on a bus instead of creating bike lanes is bonkers. Please repurpose the Silvertown Tunnel, the sooner the better."
"Repurposing the tunnel would be so much better. Or building the cycle bridge," argued the Greenwich branch of the London Cycling Campaign. "All Silvertown will bring is more pollution and more congestion. It is incompatible with a responsible climate policy in its current form."
Add new comment
21 comments
Found this on climate activist organisation possible.org, their suggestions for repurposing the tunnels: one bore to be converted into a walking/cycling/bus route, the other to be used for an extension to the DLR from Canning Town to Kidbrooke which would eliminate the need for many of the car journeys for which the tunnel was built. Sounds good to me.
"But cars!"
A cycle bridge between North Grennwich and Canary Wharf would have made so much more sense (along with another Rotherhide to Canary Wharf).
A dedicated cycle shuttle bus which can carry a grand total of eight bikes at a time? Ridiculous
Yep.
Bus "full" of bikes and you can't get on? Wait for another bus, for longer than the journey by bike would take.
And then in a year's time? Cancelled "because no one used it".
What a complete shit show.
How makes these decisions? And can they please study transport economics and policy for more than a day before spending millions of pounds please.
You think that they studied transport economics and policy for a day? Generous.
A tunnel needed to allow people to drive, walk air cycle under a major river you say? "Our tunnel is too narrow! Adding cycling would cost serious money - and nobody cycles across that part of the river anyway" you say?
Meanwhile in The Netherlands: https://bicycledutch.wordpress.com/2011/11/24/benelux-cycling-tunnel-rot...
Historic edition:
https://bicycledutch.wordpress.com/2021/03/17/the-rotterdam-maastunnel-h...
Historic but more like (a good version of) the Greenwich tunnel?): https://bicycledutch.wordpress.com/2019/03/13/the-scheldt-tunnel-in-antw...
Even if there was a cycle lane in there, as it would be shared with motor traffic all the exhaust fumes would probably take years off your life if you regularly commuted down it.
The Benelux cycling (and pedestrian) tunnel was, as I understand it, built as an access tunnel but also to do double duty when not needed for access.
I've ridden through it, and a couple of others in that area, and they are great.
It was closed for maintenance on my last visit, but they had a flatbed lorry set up that could take me and my bike via the road, or there was another option involving a slightly longer detour but still using one of the tunnels.
So it was very disappointing that TfL and their contractors couldn't be bothered to make an effort at Silvertown.
Exactly. As long as the "access" part is infrequent this can be an excellent "would need another tunnel anyway" compromise. If we "simply can't" budget for a specific dedicated active travel part - perhaps on top of the road section like one NL example.
Slightly broader use case here (covered / sheltered general space in cold/very wet climate) but another example of the "access tunnel-plus" idea from Norway.
And yes - absolutely a "cycle lane" in a long and motor-traffic-heavy tunnel is a terrible idea which is why I'm not aware people suggest doing one!
(Ultimately we need to get beyond "cycle lanes" to "separate cycle paths" and "streets which have suitable motor traffic levels and speeds for cycling on" - but even the Dutch aren't quite there yet!)
Sounds like a good reason not to have built it for motor traffic then.
From photos of the tunnel it looks like there was plenty space under the roadway for a cycle tunnel that could have been completely separate with its own ventilation system. Sadly, I expect it was just filled in with concrete though. Why would cyclists (who don't pay road tax BTW) need to cross the river anyway?
Erm... You forgot to mention The Tyne Tunnel opened in 1951!!!
That's longer than the gap between the Toon winning the cup man!
Geordies Championé (again) 🙌🙌🙌
On another note, are they "non-folding ebikes" on TfL public transport 🤔 ???
What happens when another "Franken-ebike" (folding or non-folding) ignites, on a bus - in a tunnel???
"Err... We never thunk of dat!"
I certainly have not forgotten this - not mentioned it as this was dedicated non-car infra not part of a plan together with motor traffic tunnel (mind I think one of my Dutch examples was?).
I've not been yet, but it looks not just "suitable for the age" but in fact still excellent - mostly because there's separate space for cycling and walking. This should be the standard anyway but it's an even more important feature where there are gradients AND space is inherently limited. No worries about e-motorbikers / strava louts running over your baby in a pushchair / frail elderly parents / your wheelchair!
And a 3.7 m diameter tunnel for UK cyclists - luxury! Although ... best modern standards (obviously not UK...) would likely aim at 4-5 metres for a busy bidirectional path.
That's just the right size for a cycle route... BUT NO the car has to shine
There appears, from the pics, that very little modification has been made to the bus, seems a bit half arsed to me.
And what will the charge be after the years grace.
Bus runs 5 times per hour, 15 hours per day, 364 days per year. So that's 27,300 (return) trips per year. Cost for that is £2m so each return trip is £73 per bus.
Cost per passenger is going to depend on the average number of passengers per bus. The maximum number of passengers per bus is 8 (but the average would be lower), I think you'd be looking at a minimum of £10 per person for a return fare for this to viable. But probably more (possibly a lot more).
Perhaps they will use the toll income to subsidise it...
You'd hope that a fair amount of that £2m would be upfront costs, though, rather than ongoing.
Also, that £2m appears to be for a three year contract, so it would be closer to £5 per return.
I regularly have to ride from south London to Canary Wharf. It is beyond ridiculous that I face either a huge detour to tower bridge, a foot tunnel that I'm not allowed to ride through with frequently broken lifts, a ferry, or a bus that will fit 8 bikes. In 2025. Fck cars.
This is a late April Fool's, isn't it?