- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
149 comments
I'm sorry but I thoroughly enjoyed all of that
cba watching the foreplay but the money shot is classic work.
what a bellend
Always be mindful that the driver could turn out to be a proper psycho who is tooled up! Sometimes it's better to report it rather than chases them down.
I really don't think the car passed that closely! At the speeds involved and given the street and the nature of the parking I wouldn't even register that car as passing too closely. I may be opening myself up for criticism saying that on here but, really, I think that cyclist is a camera-equipped evangelist allowing/wanting a situation to arise which needn't.
Agreed.
Most people manage to commute every day without this sort of thing and others manage to attract it on a regular basis - which suggests it is a factor of personalities not standards.
Some - drivers and cyclists - seem to go out looking for confrontations. They both got one. And now there's another driver who really hates cyclists instead of just having a general disregard.
Bike-cam footage often distorts perspective due to the use of very wide-angle lenses. Distances from the viewpoint outwards are "magnified". Telephoto lenses do the opposite.
In other words, the car passes much more closely than you would guess from this footage.
Compare with the moment that the violent oaf tumbles as he tries to kick the bike. He looks like he is way, way too far away to successfully kick the bike… why did he even try? It is because he is much nearer than he looks.
I just don't get some commenters' emphasis on the cyclist's actions.
I wouldn't have done what he did (and I watched the video with the sound off so I probably missed much of the interaction).
But some people behave recklessly and others lose their tempers in the face of dangerous behaviour, that's just human nature.
Mostly it surely just shows the utter crapness of our street designs and the problem with 'taking primary' and the vehicular-cycling stuff.
When you have motorists with an inflated sense of entitlement and anger-management issues whizzing at speed along narrow roads with cars parked on both sides, there are going to be bad outcomes. Even if they sometimes lead to video stills that look as if someone's mastered the art of levitation.
I understand that the trick is to fall over and miss the ground
So the cyclist should have let the driver carry on driving that manner unchallenged? Until the next time when that driver accidentally "clips" one of us and puts us in hospital? ****shit.
That cyclist did nothing wrong, though I'd not have ridden away myself. I'd have got off the bike and shown the overweight dickhead how a cyclists cardio-vascular system can be used for more than just pedalling.
The only thing that comes to mind is running away. Why do that when you can ride?
Because you need to show him what a cadio-vascular system can be used for!
Ah, yes. Good point.
Is this in London by any chance? Remind me never to visit again. Shithole.
The clue is in the second paragraph "The video, shot in Reading".
In London, most of us can read.
Unnecessary escalation from cyclist-two wrongs don't make a right-this overweight,angry,middle aged driver running down the street could have banged his head on the road as he fell and died-it happens,think of all the one punch deaths we hear of
Then where is the cyclist? Answering police questions and replaying his own actions for the rest of his life
I know the cyclist was wronged,but it happens to us allthe time-fair enough,challenge the driver if you happen to catch up with him,but once the initial exchange occurs and it becomes obvious what kind of twat he was dealing with,just ride off-the cameras captured enough sweary stuff and threats to go the cops with if you want to ,but continuing a row is just escalating the situation
Takes a bigger man to rise above it and ride off
Bike riders often feel that the police are siding against them, but as far as I am aware the action of "riding off while an attacker tries to catch you" is not an offence in law, in England and Wales.
As far as replaying his own actions goes, would you rather that he had stood still and allowed the irate pursuer to catch him? Is that an action which you would more happily replay in your head for the rest of your life?
I refute the implication that being pursued on foot with intent to carry out a violent assault was the bike rider's fault.
Thing is if you bait the bear it 'will' get you!
bear? Excellent one word descriptor for that obese, hairy buffoon!
Needless escalation of the situation from the rider's side me think.
But that fall... . Uncharitable I know.
Yes he should have worn a helmet and some high-viz.
Indeed it might have saved his head as he fell into the gutter. I agree, compulsory helmets and hi viz for all drivers, although neither would have prevented his tumle into the gutter
Maybe I'm being cynical but I can easily imagine the scenario where the incident gets reported the police and the driver blames it all on the cyclist and claims the cyclist assaulted him and caused facial injuries
At least having it on camera protects him against that; even it it does show that he's a bit of a prat who went looking for a confrontation.
Did the car run you over, NO so just carry on with your ride!
lol...."put your fucking mouth shut!" - what a brilliant line.
Sadly I doubt the Police would do anything about the close pass in isolation - not sure video is enough. They *should* do something about the threatening behaviour, driving without a seatbelt and Battery (or whatever that physical attack was?). He says on YT that he isn't going to report it though...
That driver was scarily quick to anger... the original point the cyclist made about the driver passing to close was correct and not in any way antagonistic.
The driver certainly needs a bit of education in respect of best practice for cycling... in that situation, narrow road, close to a junction, parked cars both sides the cyclist would have been far better off riding primary and therefore preventing the dangerous overtake in the first place.
That said, if you make a comment to a driver that they were too close and they come back with a barrage of ignorance and anger, you're unlikely to change their view on the matter and IMO best off just riding away and leaving them to their unhappy lives.
After the trying to grab his camera and then trying to take it off him I think this case should be reported to the Police. Maybe they can point out just how ill-informed he is about the rights cyclists have and about cycling best practice.
Mind you, if this goes viral, the response he'll get from any friends he has will probably be punishment enough
Sadly I'm willing to bet that this particular driver's friends are very likely to be closed-minded morons just like him and will side with him all the way... convincing him that he's in the right. He is unlikely to ever change his ways, even after the pavement belly flop...
Front tire @ 3:06 looks like there's minimal tread left on it... hope it's road worthy
Agree with above comments that the cyclist should have walked away sooner.
Fair enough saying to the driver that he passed too close but then the cyclist should have left it at that
Not sure what the cyclist achieved here other than making himself look as big a wally as the driver. I'd say both of them have anger-management issues. Was the pass close? Yes, a little, but if I yelled at everyone who passed that close to me I'd end up with a very croaky voice and in therapy. In his pursuit the cyclist also came rather too close when weaving between a crossing pedestrian and a woman crossing the road on her bike - always best to practice what you preach.
The fall was pretty funny but it shouldn't have got to that point.
Holier than thou antagonistic cyclists make city riding worse for the rest of us.
Why are cyclists expected to hold themselves accountable for the actions of other cyclists? We're very different people that choose to ride bikes. "makes city riding worse for the rest of us" - that's not the cyclists' problem, the problem lies with people who stereotype cyclists. If you replace "cyclists" with any ethnic minority, the whole thing is termed racism! Racism is not allowed, of course, but apparently stereotyping cyclists is de rigeur?!
Pages