Mat has been in cycling media since 1996, on titles including BikeRadar, Total Bike, Total Mountain Bike, What Mountain Bike and Mountain Biking UK, and he has been editor of 220 Triathlon and Cycling Plus. Mat has been road.cc technical editor for over a decade, testing bikes, fettling the latest kit, and trying out the most up-to-the-minute clothing. He has won his category in Ironman UK 70.3 and finished on the podium in both marathons he has run. Mat is a Cambridge graduate who did a post-grad in magazine journalism, and he is a winner of the Cycling Media Award for Specialist Online Writer. Now over 50, he's riding road and gravel bikes most days for fun and fitness rather than training for competitions.
Add new comment
8 comments
Interesting. I've never had an issue with either my base or premium Garmin HRMs.
And their customer service is not great.
sneakerfrfreak, are you suggesting that my Garmin measured peak HR of 261 might be inaccurate?
I hate to be the one to break it to you but yeah that sounds rather high, it's probably closer to 230
For their next project perhaps they'd like to design a reliable HR strap.
For some strange reason their bog standard HRM seems farily well liked and reliable whereas the 'premium' model gets slated for contact issues, damp ingress, wacko readings (probably not unrelated) and general fally-apartness. Go figure...
Yeah mines the "premium" strap.
Ordered a Polar strap yesterday, apparently the monitor pops straight on, and was amazed by the amount of reviews stating that they'd bought it to replace their Garmin "premium" strap.
Apologies this is way off topic.
Achievable goals and all that...... they gave up on that and bringing out fully developed products many many years ago..