- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
CS2 upgrade junctionLondon cyclists six times fitter than other commuters
London cyclists are six times fitter than other commuters, according to research published by Brunel University.
The report, by public health researcher Glenn Stewart in the Journal of Public Health, analysed the English Active People Survey, to compare weekly activity of those who used their bike as transport against those who didn’t.
It found those who commute by bike are four times more likely to meet the recommended 150 minutes of physical activity per week than those who don’t cycle, and are six times fitter than commuters who take the bus, train or car. Stewart says this provides strong evidence for investing in cycling as transport.
Make your commute more like the Tour de France (alternative version)
“I am surprised by the size of the effect rather than the effect itself,” he said.
“People are often put off by the thought of being active for 150 mins a week but if this is made part of getting around, it almost becomes hard not to meet guidelines. Cycling 15 mins to and from work 5 days a week would mean 150 mins a week without even trying."
“Given that the effect size rises in central London - where there have been investments in cycle infrastructure - promoting cycling as a means of transport has enormous potential for public health decision makers as a way of getting people fitter in the UK”.
Simon Munk, Infrastructure Campaigner at London Cycling Campaign, told Brunel: “We already know from the Department of Transport that spending on cycling infrastructure offers much better value for money than most transport infrastructure projects. This study also confirms that ‘utility’ cycling, as a simple transport option even for short journeys, can help people rapidly reach their recommended physical activity levels. The key to getting more people to cycle such journeys is, though, safe space for cycling”.
The Active People Survey is a large telephone survey of sport and “active recreation” in England carried out by Sport England.
Laura Laker is a freelance journalist with more than a decade’s experience covering cycling, walking and wheeling (and other means of transport). Beginning her career with road.cc, Laura has also written for national and specialist titles of all stripes. One part of the popular Streets Ahead podcast, she sometimes appears as a talking head on TV and radio, and in real life at conferences and festivals. She is also the author of Potholes and Pavements: a Bumpy Ride on Britain’s National Cycle Network.
Latest Comments
- Blackthorne 3 sec ago
I disagree, the lucky few who get to wear one of these will certainly produce more mass.
- Hirsute 13 min 34 sec ago
You were only supposed to blow the bloody doors off....
- Dnnnnnn 34 min 30 sec ago
That wasn't what my original post was about - it was about the NHS as it is now. If you're going to be run over by an ambulance tomorrow, there are...
- imajez 59 min 18 sec ago
I prefer the not haveing to faff with brakes in first place, which is the typical reality for hydraulic systems.
- Backladder 4 hours 2 min ago
I'm sure the met are merely waiting for it to build up to a critical mass and then they'll swoop in and confiscate and crush them all then there...
- qwerty360 5 hours 54 min ago
Reality - I expect most first year lectures have more than 80 students at them; So 80 bicycle spaces is a rounding error on potential demand....
- whosatthewheel 7 hours 34 min ago
Especially that it is a traffic light controlled junction so he must have been completely blinded not to see the red on his left hand side and a...
- biking59boomer 8 hours 5 min ago
Send the details to UK network rail and Transport for Wales as well!
- KDee 8 hours 53 min ago
So that Pulsium from Lapierre has a 415mm wheelbase? I assume it's on 20 inch wheels then!
- ktache 9 hours 49 min ago
It's been one hell of a ride Cav, thanks for letting us share some of it. https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2024/nov/09/mark-cavendish-final-race-...
Add new comment
21 comments
If it wasn't for the helmet I'd have sworn that was Yehuda Moon in the picture.
It's six times more likely to reach their daily recommended exercise threshold than non-cyclists. The average over the UK is four times. And this is just utility cyclists - in other words, cyclists who also ride sportives or mountain bike or do lots of other sports are neutralised in the results.
All clickbait. The article does not say that cyclists are 6 times fitter. In fact it does not use the word "fitter" at all, or even the word "fit" other than to discuss fitting data to statistical models.
The 6x refers to the likelihood of inner london cyclists meeting the recommended levels of exercise.
So the study sayes that people who self-identify as taking exercise are more likely to meet the Department of Health recommended minimum levels of exercise. Big shock.
The clickbait headline appears to be a shameless plug from Brunel University to generate some publicity for a study that confirmed the obvious. Unfortunately, "journalism" appears to consist of regurgitating the press-release rather than even the most cursory fact-checking of the source.
Do you all remember that first time you really pushed yourself hard and completely blew up. Now imagine hundreds of people absolutely incapable of anger or anything else
This appears to be the study for those wondering. http://m.jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/12/11/pubmed.f...
Cycling shouldn't be forced upon people. All we would end up with is angry aggressive cyclists. Cycling should be promoted all over the UK we should have extra roads built and maintained to help people who want to cycle.
Fat chance of that. It would be hilarious to see, though.
My wife once told me I was a god amongst men. Now I know I am merely a god amongst bus drivers.
"6 times fitter"
That is a silly and vague claim in this article but not necessarily ridiculous. When I started road cycling 30k was challenging for me. I recently finished the 180k Etape London. 30x6=180 six times fitter.
May be 6 times fitter but only half as purple. What the hell does 6 times fitter mean?
Bugger, I'm not typing all that out again. Synopsis - SHOCKING revelation.
I think it's 'fitter' as in more shaggable. Excuse the medical mumbo jumbo.
VO2 max max 6 times higher? Resting heartrate 6 times lower? I wish!
Anyone have access to the thesis to get the details?
What does "six times fitter" mean anyway? I can't think of any measure where I'm even twice as fit as I was before I started cycling.
Who knows? <shrug> But it sounds impressive and gets people reading.
Although Duncann is right, unlike coca-cola advertising, I don't think facts like these actually change people's behaviour. Has the general population responded to the frequent media articles about the obesity epidemic, Diabetes etc etc and slimmed down? No.
The suggestion to "save the planet" hasn't got bugger all folks out of their cars (or even reduced the number of journeys they make). According to government figures, in the 12 months to June 2015 "motor vehicle traffic increased by 2.3% to a new high of 314.6 billion vehicle miles" [source]
Behavioural change won't come about by talking about weight loss, the environment etc etc but by two things (among others):
1. good quality infrastructure
2. make driving more expensive and/or less convenient
Considering every government's reluctance to embrace either of these plus the Tories' enthusiasm for building roads and giving the finger to public transport and cycling and walking infrastructure I wouldn't expect much to change just yet
However, I do know that I am considerably happier and healthier than if I drove to work each day. So I'm going to I call that a win-win scenario.
Maybe they should employee Coca Cola's advertising firm?
I initially read this as London cyclist commuters 6 times fitter than other cyclist commuters.
And was about to explode......................
Regular commuters fitter than most. I'd never have guessed.
We needed a study to learn this why?!
Preaching to the converted, just the rest of the world that needs to catch up.
You've heard of Coca-Cola - but they keep on advertising...
It's important to keep pressing home the message and keep it to front of mind (save people having to think about it for themselves...).
Excellent point actually, I like it!