Cyclists in outer London boroughs have been failed by Mayor Boris Johnson, a report by the Green Party ahead of this year’s Mayoral election has claimed.
Just a fifth of money set aside to fund infrastructure improvements has been spent in the outer boroughs since 2008, according to London Assembly member Darren Johnson - who calls on the next Mayor to make the situation more equal.
The research suggests that inner London boroughs have benefitted from £314m of cycling schemes while outer London benefitted by just £75m.
This comes despite two thirds of all outings by bicycle being made in the outer boroughs.
Mr Johnson said: “We are now seeing some top quality cycle lanes in parts of central London and that is very welcome, but people who want to cycle in outer London have had a raw deal while Boris Johnson has been in office.
“We know that millions of short suburban car trips could be made by bike instead, freeing up road space, cleaning up the air and making people fitter. This Mayor dithered for years, then finally started to build some quality schemes such as the Waltham Forest mini Holland.
“The next Mayor must expand this programme and complete all of the superhighways and quietways in the pipeline to kick start an outer London cycling revolution.”
Boris Johnson’s own research has found that while over 2.7 million outer London journeys could reasonably be cycled every day from start to end, just a fraction of these trips - 133,000 of them -are taken by bicycle.
Mr Johnson created an infographic showing who the spending had been allocated - and says it proves how the top 5 projects funded by the Mayor(left wheel) overwhelmingly benefit inner London.
He says that the large amounts of money needed to engineer and follow through ambitious projects in car-heavy London boroughs like Brent just weren’t supplied - with only £300,000 allocated to that borough.
And of 12 proposed cycle superhighway routes into the city, only five will be completed by the end of Boris Johnson’s reign. In Hounslow, where Cycle Superhighway 9 was to be built, an ‘inflexible council’ caused the planning to be ‘bogged down’, said Darren Johnson.
In Enfield, he said, a proposed Mini Holland will not be ready till 2018, and in the meantime cyclists face dangerous routes.
As we reported last year, Oxford Street is likely to close to motor traffic, and cyclists to be allowed to turn left at red lights, after this year, since the biggest London mayoral candidates have agreed to pursue the policies, if elected.
In response to Stop Killing Cyclists' 10 by 2020 campaign, which sets out ten asks for mayoral candidates, there was unanimous support to improve air quality on one of Europe's most polluted streets and, perhaps more surprisingly, for the Idaho Stop law (link is external), named after the US state where cyclists can treat red lights as stop signs, and proceed if the way is clear.
Mayoral candidates were chosen by their respective parties last year, and are: Sadiq Khan (Labour), Zac Goldsmith (Conservative), Caroline Pidgeon (Liberal Democrat), Sian Berry (Green). Rosalind Readhead stands as an independent candidate.
Add new comment
8 comments
If you take off the £174M spent on Boris Bikes, it becomes £75M outer London, £140M inner London. Still unequal (2:1) but not 4:1 as the article states.
I have a 6 mile cycle to work across the London Borough of Bromley, and must admit it is a nice run with few problems. The biggest problem, ironically, is where there is a 'cycle lane' which is so bad it would be safer if it did not exist. I am talking about the notorious A21 cycle lane which puts cyclists and pedestrians at risk and a crazy roundabout scheme which tries to be a continental roundabout but which takes cyclists out of the line of sight of motorists and is too dangerous to use. That is money wasted. A proper A21 cycle highway would be amazing but apart from that I don't think we need cycle lanes. What we need is better enforcement of speed limits. My idea of a quiet back road avoiding heavy traffic is someone else's idea of a 40mph rat run, and the police rarely enforce the 30mph speed limit. So I do not want to see money spent on half baked schemes such as the A21. Spend the money on enforcing speed limits.
Where is the wheel on the tricycle showing London/Rest of the country?
Well given that a discussion about inner LONDON vs outer LONDON and it's referencing LONDON funding, Transport for LONDON and the Mayor of LONDON, I'm not exactly surprised not to find anything about the rest of the country...
That's a different graph altogether!
I understand it's somewhat out of context given the article but I think his point was that LONDONLONDONLONDON and bugger the rest of the country. I'd love there to be that kind of money spent elsewhere..
Just to be clear, in relation to Cycle Superhighway 9, the 'inflexible council' causing the planning to be 'bogged down' wasn't Hounslow, it was the cycle-hating Kensington & Chelsea council who are refusing to take any measures apart from those that will not inconvenience motor vehicle users in the slightest.
http://www.getwestlondon.co.uk/news/local-news/cycle-superhighway-9-go-a...
There really needs to be more effort made to take control of roads aways from dinosaurs like K&C, otherwise things will never change in terms of congestion, road pollution and other issues.
I'd extend that to transport as a whole within a high percentage of the London commute area (m25?) Eg N London has travelcard zones > 6 (9?), here (kt12) just outside the sw zone 6 we get doubling screwed by South West Trains. Not only is there a larger step increment for going outside 6 than with TFL, but they brought in a 930 ripoff-peak fare 5-6 yrs ago cos they realised that a lot of people were using the post 930 off-peak. 'Proper' offpeak is now 1130, compared to 930 which it used to be as still is in the TFL zones, despite z9 etc being further out.
This isn't exactly surprising but good to see it quantified. Boris has always been about highly visible flagship projects such as the hire bikes or cycles superhighways. These garner a lot of media attention but 90% of London cyclists will never use them. See the Emirates Airline or the ridiculous garden bridge as evidence of his ego driven approach to public infrastructure.
Infrastructure and schemes have a role but where is the enforcement of traffic laws? Where is the public criticism of woeful driving standards? Why do none of our "leaders" speak out about what is really putting people off riding, which is the behaviour of a sizeable minority of dangerous and selfish drivers.
Doubtless some junctions need redesigning and some segregation is useful, but where are the attempts to change this behaviour? Changes in driving would make the roads safer across the country but no-one seems to want to publicly criticise any motorist regardless of how anti-social or dangerous their driving.