Former round-the-world Guinness World Record holder and South West Cyclo-cross stalwart Vin Cox has resigned his membership of British Cycling after it emerged that former pro cyclist David Millar is working on a voluntary basis with its academy riders.
News that Millar was working with the youngsters at their new training base in Montechiara, Tuscany, was confirmed by the governing body this morning and given the two year ban for doping imposed on him in 2004 was always likely to prove controversial.
> British Cycling confirm David Millar mentoring GB academy riders
Cox, who circumnavigated the globe in 176 days in 2010, resigned from the organisation publicly in a message on Facebook to South West Cyclo-cross with which he has had a long association as a rider, administrator and race organiser.
He wrote: “With regret I have just resigned my membership of the corrupted British Cycling due to their appointment of renowned doper David Millar. Therefore I cannot serve on the South West Cyclo-cross Committee, or organise events next season. Good luck without me folks.”
He told road.cc:
On reading it [the news] I just thought no way am I wanting anything to do with it. They can employ who they like but they need to understand that some of their members may not agree to be part of an organisation if they choose to employ someone so controversial.
You can pick literally anyone who hadn’t been doping who would be a better ambassador. The argument for him is that he is a poacher turned gamekeeper and that he knows what it’s all about having been there but to go along with that to say it’s okay that he cheated and he had a career that his clean peers never had a chance because they never cheated.
I think it’s just wrong to have someone who was banned as a World Champion for cheating, who cost British Cycling money and credibility. He was a damage to sport at the time, he should be saying I was a damage to the sport at the time and I should be finding something else to do.
I don’t want any of my efforts or money to go towards his wages or to give him any credibility. I’m out of British Cycling, as long as he’s in.
I think cycling would be better rid of him than embracing him. He is a known cheat and I think that he shouldn’t be courted or given a role in cycling.
Nicole Cooke said he’s not an expert in doping, in any other sense than he knows how to do it. He had a big lapse of morals that other people seem to be able to keep hold of.
Some people think that because he says he came back clean he deserves another chance. I don’t see it that way.
While Millar’s role is voluntary at the moment, British Cycling has said that he may move into a formal role from the end of this month.
Great Britain Cycling Team technical director Shane Sutton said of Millar’s role: “Nurturing an anti-doping culture is at the heart of everything we do at British Cycling and educating our young riders on the subject is a responsibility we take seriously.
“Having someone of David’s calibre on board to support us in this education process is invaluable; he is readily available to share his well-rounded experiences as a professional cyclist to the young riders who aspire to succeed in their careers.”
Opinion among road.cc Facebook followers was split on the issue.
Ben Turp asked, “What? The guy who got caught doping? Yeah okay,” while Steven Edwards said, “Are you f****** kidding,” and Francis Longworth commented, “Lance unavailable.”
But James Asker wrote: “There will always be those who say why let an ex doper anywhere near our younger riders.
“That said having read about David and his rise and spectacular fall he is very well placed to advise younger riders on the risks to their health and careers.”
And Malc Wiggypig Hall said it was “Fantastic news, glad they are putting all that experience to good use. He can talk the talk and walk the walk. Unlike many keyboard experts here.”
Mick Chambers, meanwhile, noted: “Poacher turned gatekeeper, Why not, who knows more about the problems?”
Add new comment
64 comments
Hi Kevin - I'm Nicole's father. Perhaps you can identify quite where you sourced the information on what Nicole did and did not do ? You seem sure of your account. You must have heard it from soemwhere.
A lunatic might think that a clean rider might be quiet when they were offered drugs and then had their wages stopped by their team. That is what had happened to her. Nicole was not quiet. She made inquiries on how to progress her information in Italy and she together with myself opted for informing the organisation that was the predecessor of UK AD which was called "Drug Free Sport" and it was part of UK Sport. I travelled to London to represent Nicole (she was riding in Italy) and the information she had. There I met with the Director and a minute taker for him. I did not hold back on any information. I was informed that there was nothing Drug Free Sport could do. Cycling at that time, 2002, had not signed up to the WADA code and so activity in Italy provided no collective reference point to an overarching body. Further, the team Nicole rode for was not resistered in Italy, even though it based itself there and as such the Italian anti doping agency had no powers whatsoever to conduct action against it apart from when enegaged in actual competitions in Italy. Given the workload of the Italian Federation dealing with matters within its own jurisdiction - it was at that time, in the view of the UK Director, overloaded, there would be nothing they could do and so he had no intention of passing any information to the Italian anti-doping agency. The Director thought it even more unlikely that an appeal to the anti-doping agency of the country of registration of the team would ellicit any action and again he was not going to attempt to communicate. As I stated to Nicole on my return, nothing in sport had disapppointed me more than the reception her informatin receved at that time.
What neither Nicole or Drug Free Sport were aware of was that the Italian Police were engaged in robust activity including tapping the phone of the the gentleman in question. Later that year they made their move and 27 were caught up in their net including 6 male and 3 female riders. That particualr doping ring was broken. None of the sporting bodies contribbuted one iota to that achievement.
Nicole was 19 at the time of all this.
Throughout her caree Nicole paid a heavy price for speaking out. again and again You might care to read about the events of those times and take an opion of how others, engaged in doping practises might view her.
She is happy to walk away with her head held high.
What I and her modest band of supporters find gauling is that having paid the price once for her determined stand, now others, mis-informed and mis-guided seek to heap more injury on her.
Rather than amplfy nonesense, can I suggest that anyone who wants to find out more about Nicole's career might borrow her book from the library. Chapter 22 "exposing the drug cheats" would be useful in this context. Sadly the legal department of the publishers were cautious about this section and as published, I believe it is about 1/4 of what she wrote in draft form. However I think it will give you most of what you need to know
As to whether David Millar might be the best individual to cousel youngsters about the inequities of PED use, we might all have opinions. Only one opinion really counts, that of Shane Sutton and he clearly thinks David is the best person for the job.
Tony
Seems he has spat his dummy out.
One can only assume he has lived a life of never having made a mistake and never broken any laws. In todays society an individual who commits an offence, and is found guilty, takes their punishment and is allowed back into society to get on with their lives. Obviously Vin doesnt believe in forgiveness or that the ban David served was sufficient. He must believe dopers should be punished for eternity.
Given the above photo, someone should give Vin Cox some guidance about how to fit his helmet.
He's riding round the world, no f**ks given, not a single one.
Pages