Bob Geldof has accused former Mayor of London Boris Johnson of “clogging up” the capital’s streets as a result of the Cycle Superhighways that he initiated, describing them as a “ludicrous vanity project.”
The pop star turned activist made his comments during Wednesday’s bizarre scenes on the Thames when he and UKIP leader Nigel Farage led rival flotillas on the Thames just eight days before next week’s referendum on the UK’s membership of the EU.
Farage, like Johnson, is one of the figureheads of the Leave campaign, while Geldof was accompanied on his boat by fellow Remain supporters including the ex-mayor’s sister, Rachel Johnson.
BikeBiz executive editor and cycling author Carlton Reid was alerted to the comments, made in an interview a Mirror journalist conducted on board the vessel with the Boomtown Rats singer and Band Aid co-founder, by road safety campaigners Cosain Galway.
Geldof, who has homes in London and Kent, told the Mirror’s Mikey Smith that Johnson had “clogged up the streets of London by building this ludicrous vanity bicycle project,” adding that he thought the Cycle Superhighways were "ridiculous."
You could be forgiven for thinking that Geldof might have welcomed safe infrastructure for cyclists in London, given these photographs of him riding on the pavement in Sloane Street, although he’s been known to cycle on the road near his Chelsea home, too.
Tuesday’s so-called ‘Battle of the Thames’ was ostensibly about the insistence of each camp that it is the best one for Britain’s fishermen.
With the boats within shouting distance of each other, Geldof branded Farage, who attended just one meeting out of 42 of the EU’s Fisheries Committee when he sat on it, a “fraud” and made a ‘wanker’ gesture at him.
The Huffington Post quoted the UKIP leader as retorting: “The guy has got a big mouth, he was a crap pop star and he’s not even British as far as I understand, he’s from the Irish Republic, he hasn’t got a say in the matter.”
In fact, like any Irish citizen who is resident in the UK, Geldof – whose charity work led to him being awarded an honorary knighthood – is entitled to vote next week, and is urging those of his compatriots who are likewise eligible to vote Remain.
Add new comment
42 comments
I stand corrected but who appoints the Commisioners? It wouldn't be the relevant counties elected Government by any chance would it. It's still democracy in action whether you like how it works or not. A country can still recall it's Commisioners.
If it is democracy it's a very poor form of democracy.
The electorate has no direct way of electing or removing a commisoner.
The fact that Neil Kinnock enjoyed a long career as a (highly paid) commissioner despite losing 2 general elections should be an indication of how little the views of the electorate matter when it comes to appointments.
Unlike that well known bastion of representative democracy: the House of Lords.
http://twitter.com/MadameButcher/status/743871481541722112/photo/1
House of Lords is indeed undemocratic. I would like to see it abolished.
Being marginally better than the HoL doesn't make the EU commission a good thing.
You still can't vote for anyone in it. Or most of the parties in the EU parliament for that matter...
We did vote for the ones who chose the Commisioners though.
And the ones who chose the majority of the HoL.
That's my point; we democratically chose the choosers!
That's not the same as democracy though.
We can't vote out an EU commissioner.
We can't vote for anyone with the power to repeal EU laws.
Actually, it's not so simple, we chose then ONE who chose the Commission and currently that one is Jean-Claude Juncker, the man responsible for massive scale tax avoidance across the world especially in Europe.
And how can a system be democratic if you don't even know how it works.
The comparison by many with the house of lords is false because the house of lords do not choose what laws to write and then write them.
i thought this was cycling website. Must be wrong. I'll go elsewhere then.
How is the EU not democratic? The only people who can pass EU laws are elected officials, or (elected) ministers from th EU nations.
The Leave side were asked to name a reputable study who said that we would be better off, or the same, as we are today after Brexit. Couldn't do it. We will undeniably be much worse off outside the EU economically. Whether you think this is a price worth paying for some vague feeling of empowerment is up to you. But don't try and pretend that it's not a massive gamble with the future of everyone in the country, as that is completely disingenuous. You are risking the futures of all our children. You have to decide whether it's worth it, and whether you can explain it to your kids when they can't get a job.
I think it's about Bob being a total wanker, known as the 'Mr gimme your feckin money '
Pages