Signs telling drivers “Cyclists Can Take the Lane – Stop Honking” have been installed on an Ottawa road after cyclists reported being harassed by impatient drivers.
The green and yellow signs, installed on a bridge that was narrowed to a single lane for road works, are intended to remind motorists cyclists are vehicles too, and that vehicles should go single file across the bridge.
Earlier signage asking drivers to "share the road", which runs over the Rideau River through the Ontario city, didn't work, according to Councillor David Chernushenko, with drivers honking and harassing cyclists until they move over, placing them in danger.
Cllr Chernushenko told the Metro News he instructed his staff to rethink the original “Share the Road” signage after the overtaking problem persisted.
“Obviously the polite signage wasn’t working,” he said. “No one likes to be told to relax, but that’s essentially the message. We’re all stuck here crossing this bridge, so let’s be safe about it.”
“During construction projects [frustration] becomes particularly acute,” he said. “People are frustrated because they’ve already been delayed.”
He told the Metro News some drivers haven’t taken the new signs well, but believes that’s to be expected “when you do the right thing”.
Heather Shearer, of Citizens for Safe Cycling, said: “It makes a good point. The other ‘share the road’ signs can be misunderstood as ‘cyclists, get out of the way'.”
Chernushenko said the signs will be taken down once works are complete, but they could be used elsewhere in the city.
He said: “My goal is to see them strategically placed, definitely at all construction projects and at known existing problematic areas.”
The installation of the signs has coincided with the ramping up of enforcement of dangerous overtaking. During one two-hour period 29 drivers were ticketed for illegally passing a cyclist on a single file road, Constable Chuck Benoit told the Metro News. He said further ticketing blitzes will be carried out across the summer while construction work continues.
Local police have made a succinct video backing up the sign's message.
The UK has a similar, though less pointed, sign: the Narrow Lanes, don’t overtake cyclists sign (pictured).
Help us to fund our site
We’ve noticed you’re using an ad blocker. If you like road.cc, but you don’t like ads, please consider subscribing to the site to support us directly. As a subscriber you can read road.cc ad-free, from as little as £1.99.
If you don’t want to subscribe, please turn your ad blocker off. The revenue from adverts helps to fund our site.
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
Laura Laker is a freelance journalist with more than a decade’s experience covering cycling, walking and wheeling (and other means of transport). Beginning her career with road.cc, Laura has also written for national and specialist titles of all stripes. One part of the popular Streets Ahead podcast, she sometimes appears as a talking head on TV and radio, and in real life at conferences and festivals. She is also the author of Potholes and Pavements: a Bumpy Ride on Britain’s National Cycle Network.
This is covered in Bikeability, the Police training manual, there's a detailed explanation by Carlton Reid over at motoring.co.uk, an IAM spokesman and others agree in the Graun etc etc yet too many drivers still don't understand or just don't care!
Last week I was accused by a 4x4 truck driver of "riding in the middle of the road". It's a narrow stretch of winding A-road with a 40 mph limit and double white lines. I was in secondary position about a metre from the verge doing 18-20 mph but he had to overtake into oncoming traffic, causing the other driver to brake sharply. He can't have been in that much of a hurry though, because 400 yards down the road he then pulled onto the verge to argue about it. Ignorant jerk.
All the others suggests the cyclist rides in the gutter.
I'm not sure which country that's from and I don't know what implications the shape and colour of the sign would have there (cf blue=info in uk, triangle is warning and circle is command, with only a few exceptions) but to me this sign is dangerously ambiguous. Aggresive drivers may think that the command is addressed to cyclists doing what is shown in the picture, and cyclists will think that the picture illustrates the correct way of doing what the text says. I suspect the latter is correct, but there is too much room for idiot drivers to misunderstand imho!
I think the UK sign pictured is actually ok. I've never seen it used though.
This week I've had to dodge around another 'Cyclists dismount' sign on my way to work. It was placed in the cycle lane at a point opposite some road works on the other side of the road. There was a clear lane and cycle lane on my side. The road would be narrow only if an oncoming vehicle strays over the white line to pass on the other side which they shouldn't do into oncoming traffic.
So instead of taking the lane and continuing on legally apparently I should get off the road and *walk* on the pavement. There was no remount sign, so I might be still walking. The only obstacle on my side of the road was the sign itself.
I suspect that these things are put up by non-cyclists.
This week I've had to dodge around another 'Cyclists dismount' sign on my way to work. It was placed in the cycle lane at a point opposite some road works on the other side of the road.
"Existing Cycle Facilities:
Where there is cycle provision, such as cycle lanes or tracks, efforts should be made to keep these open or to provide an acceptable alternative during the road works. They should not be blocked by signs, debris, plant, etc."
Find out who owns the road works and point out them in no uncertain terms that they really should be following this TAL.
Add new comment
9 comments
It's refreshing that even the local bobbies got involved with promoting the message.
Over here they're far to busy fining cyclists without lights.
From http://think.direct.gov.uk/cycling.html (though IMHO the grammar could be better).
This is covered in Bikeability, the Police training manual, there's a detailed explanation by Carlton Reid over at motoring.co.uk, an IAM spokesman and others agree in the Graun etc etc yet too many drivers still don't understand or just don't care!
Last week I was accused by a 4x4 truck driver of "riding in the middle of the road". It's a narrow stretch of winding A-road with a 40 mph limit and double white lines. I was in secondary position about a metre from the verge doing 18-20 mph but he had to overtake into oncoming traffic, causing the other driver to brake sharply. He can't have been in that much of a hurry though, because 400 yards down the road he then pulled onto the verge to argue about it. Ignorant jerk.
The only share the road sign which works is this one: http://c8.alamy.com/comp/DBTTFE/share-the-road-traffic-sign-indicating-both-cyclists-and-motorists-DBTTFE.jpg
All the others suggests the cyclist rides in the gutter.
share-the-road-traffic-sign-indicating-both-cyclists-and-motorists-DBTTFE.jpg
I'm not sure which country that's from and I don't know what implications the shape and colour of the sign would have there (cf blue=info in uk, triangle is warning and circle is command, with only a few exceptions) but to me this sign is dangerously ambiguous. Aggresive drivers may think that the command is addressed to cyclists doing what is shown in the picture, and cyclists will think that the picture illustrates the correct way of doing what the text says. I suspect the latter is correct, but there is too much room for idiot drivers to misunderstand imho!
I think the UK sign pictured is actually ok. I've never seen it used though.
Canada
http://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-share-the-road-traffic-sign-indicating-...
Doesn't this actually mean "Cyclist, do a rad bunnyhop over the car"
I think it's a good idea. Too many motorists interpret 'share the road' as 'cyclists, get out of my way, share the road why don't you?'.
This week I've had to dodge around another 'Cyclists dismount' sign on my way to work. It was placed in the cycle lane at a point opposite some road works on the other side of the road. There was a clear lane and cycle lane on my side. The road would be narrow only if an oncoming vehicle strays over the white line to pass on the other side which they shouldn't do into oncoming traffic.
So instead of taking the lane and continuing on legally apparently I should get off the road and *walk* on the pavement. There was no remount sign, so I might be still walking. The only obstacle on my side of the road was the sign itself.
I suspect that these things are put up by non-cyclists.
If this is in the UK, then TAL 15/99 "Cyclists at road works" applies https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/traffic-advisory-leaflets-198...
Amongst other things it says:
"Existing Cycle Facilities:
Where there is cycle provision, such as cycle lanes or tracks, efforts should be made to keep these open or to provide an acceptable alternative during the road works. They should not be blocked by signs, debris, plant, etc."
Find out who owns the road works and point out them in no uncertain terms that they really should be following this TAL.