Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Man fined £220 for cycling through red light

The Institute of Advanced Motorists has responded by saying the UK should consider changing the law to allow cycling through some red lights

A man was ordered to pay £220 this week for cycling through a red light, prompting the Institute of Advanced Motorists to call for bicycles to be allowed to ride through some red lights.

32-year-old Jurjys Renins was fined £220 for failing to stop at a red signal in Norwich city centre, as well as a £22 victim surcharge and £85 in court costs.

Police district commander Superintendent Dave Marshall has urged cyclists to stop at red lights for their own safety, particularly if going straight at crossroads.

Denmark cyclists allowed to turn right at red lights

He told the Eastern Daily Press: “This is a significant issue. It’s extremely dangerous because vehicles travelling through green lights don’t expect to see cyclists going through ahead of them.”

Supt Marshall said the offence also causes “a lot of upset between motorists and cyclists.”

However, the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) told road.cc though all road users should respect the law, the UK should consider allowing cycles to proceed through certain red lights, as Denmark has done.

Bicycles turning right on red was found not to increase collision rates after a two year trial on 33 Danish junctions, and the movement will become legal from 1 September on those junctions.

Martin Woodhouse, Norfolk and Norwich branch secretary of the IAM, said of cyclists jumping lights: “They are breaking the law but perhaps we should be looking at amending the interpretation of the law to make it safe for them to do so in certain circumstances.

“Cyclists going through red lights are probably more of a danger to themselves than anyone else. If they have a collision with a car, it’s them who is going to come out of it worse off.”

Norwich Cycling Campaign secretary, Margaret Todd, said there needs to be more enforcement for all traffic offences, not just for cyclists.

“We think there has been a drop in traffic enforcement. We don’t think cyclists should be treated any differently,” she said.

Laura Laker is a freelance journalist with more than a decade’s experience covering cycling, walking and wheeling (and other means of transport). Beginning her career with road.cc, Laura has also written for national and specialist titles of all stripes. One part of the popular Streets Ahead podcast, she sometimes appears as a talking head on TV and radio, and in real life at conferences and festivals. She is also the author of Potholes and Pavements: a Bumpy Ride on Britain’s National Cycle Network.

Add new comment

38 comments

Avatar
Jimnm | 8 years ago
0 likes

It would have been worse had he been cycling through  red light district Haha!!

what would his Mrs have done to him lol 

Avatar
NPlus1Bikelights | 8 years ago
0 likes

It appears from the EDP cyclist-jumping-reds follow up count that this was a pedestrian crossing so IAM statment doesn't really apply here at all, I have no issue with cyclists going through those if the peds have already crossed since pressing the button and no one is waiting. At the other end of the road mentioned though Norwich city centre is roadworks with temporary 5 way lights, those need harsh penalties for jumping even though the wait times are horrendous but it does stop you meeting a bus head-on in a single lane

Avatar
HalfWheeler | 8 years ago
1 like

I've not much sympathy tbh, I wish more people on bikes were caught and prosecuted for running red lights. The fine seems a bit on the heavy side, should be more like a bus lane or parking fine.

But RLJs are twits, a pox on them.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn | 8 years ago
2 likes

Good to see that fearless investigative journalism by the newspaper has revealed that,

"Mr Renins is not the only cyclist who has failed to stop at a red signal"

I'd never have know this otherwise. The Eastern Daily Press has done the nation a great service.

Avatar
bendertherobot | 8 years ago
1 like

Right, a FPN is £50. So either this is a contested FPN or something else. 

The question is what the charge was?

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to bendertherobot | 8 years ago
1 like

bendertherobot wrote:

Right, a FPN is £50. So either this is a contested FPN or something else. 

The question is what the charge was?

Being a lippy arse?

Avatar
Awavey replied to bendertherobot | 8 years ago
0 likes
bendertherobot wrote:

Right, a FPN is £50. So either this is a contested FPN or something else. 

The question is what the charge was?

The minimum fpn for not stopping at red light is £100 + 3 points on your driving license,presumably the magistrates converted points to extra fine & added aggravating circumstances ? Max is £1000

Avatar
bendertherobot replied to Awavey | 8 years ago
0 likes

Awavey wrote:
bendertherobot wrote:

Right, a FPN is £50. So either this is a contested FPN or something else. 

The question is what the charge was?

The minimum fpn for not stopping at red light is £100 + 3 points on your driving license,presumably the magistrates converted points to extra fine & added aggravating circumstances ? Max is £1000

It's a non endorsable as it's on a bike.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 8 years ago
15 likes

When I am king it will be a capital offence to push the pelican crossing button and then cross without waiting for it.

Maybe they could make the lights change quicker then. Some politicians say they want us to walk and cycle more, but then when it takes forever and a day for the pedestrian lights to change, as car after car goes past, you get the message about who is really important/prioritised.

Avatar
davel replied to HarrogateSpa | 8 years ago
8 likes
HarrogateSpa wrote:

When I am king it will be a capital offence to push the pelican crossing button and then cross without waiting for it.

Maybe they could make the lights change quicker then. Some politicians say they want us to walk and cycle more, but then when it takes forever and a day for the pedestrian lights to change, as car after car goes past, you get the message about who is really important/prioritised.

This.

I often lament city 'design' while I, and 5-10 other pedestrians, wait, in the pissing rain, for one car, with one dry occupant in comfort, to crawl up a side street in Manchester city centre. What are we waiting for? The rapture? An appearance by one of the Kardashians? No: to walk 6 yards to another bit of the city centre. The hierarchy in town centres and neighbourhoods is arse-about-tit.

This country's going to to hell in single occupancy Nissan Qashqais.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to davel | 8 years ago
1 like

davel wrote:
HarrogateSpa wrote:

When I am king it will be a capital offence to push the pelican crossing button and then cross without waiting for it.

Maybe they could make the lights change quicker then. Some politicians say they want us to walk and cycle more, but then when it takes forever and a day for the pedestrian lights to change, as car after car goes past, you get the message about who is really important/prioritised.

This. I often lament city 'design' while I, and 5-10 other pedestrians, wait, in the pissing rain, for one car, with one dry occupant in comfort, to crawl up a side street in Manchester city centre. What are we waiting for? The rapture? An appearance by one of the Kardashians? No: to walk 6 yards to another bit of the city centre. The hierarchy in town centres and neighbourhoods is arse-about-tit. This country's going to to hell in single occupancy Nissan Qashqais.

Err, what are you waiting for? If it's safe to cross, do! 

"Jaywalking" isn't an offence in mainland UK, although strangely I think Northern Ireland is different. 

Avatar
davel replied to Dnnnnnn | 8 years ago
0 likes
Duncann wrote:

davel wrote:
HarrogateSpa wrote:

When I am king it will be a capital offence to push the pelican crossing button and then cross without waiting for it.

Maybe they could make the lights change quicker then. Some politicians say they want us to walk and cycle more, but then when it takes forever and a day for the pedestrian lights to change, as car after car goes past, you get the message about who is really important/prioritised.

This. I often lament city 'design' while I, and 5-10 other pedestrians, wait, in the pissing rain, for one car, with one dry occupant in comfort, to crawl up a side street in Manchester city centre. What are we waiting for? The rapture? An appearance by one of the Kardashians? No: to walk 6 yards to another bit of the city centre. The hierarchy in town centres and neighbourhoods is arse-about-tit. This country's going to to hell in single occupancy Nissan Qashqais.

Err, what are you waiting for? If it's safe to cross, do! 

Err, in my example, the car.

Point: pedestrians have to wait for cars.

Not the point: pedestrians can cross roads. But thanks anyway.

Avatar
Housecathst replied to davel | 8 years ago
2 likes

[/quote]This country's going to to hell in single occupancy Nissan Qashqais.[/quote]

totally, totally, brilliant, there are millions of those wanbe off roads about aren't there

Avatar
harrybav replied to davel | 8 years ago
2 likes

davel wrote:

one car, with one dry occupant

This is my thinking too. When I'm squashed in on a busy urban residential road that has parallel parking, I'm aware that we could have 100m of full-lane segregated cycle roadway if we were willing to prioritise the 1000 people on bikes over the 20 occasional-use car owners using the space as a car park.

Avatar
Gourmet Shot replied to HarrogateSpa | 8 years ago
3 likes

HarrogateSpa wrote:

When I am king it will be a capital offence to push the pelican crossing button and then cross without waiting for it.

Maybe they could make the lights change quicker then. Some politicians say they want us to walk and cycle more, but then when it takes forever and a day for the pedestrian lights to change, as car after car goes past, you get the message about who is really important/prioritised.

 

Can I add to your legislation that pedestrians (usually looking down at their phones) who push the pelican crossing button when there are no cars within sight get a bloody good shoeing.........pisses me off as I do stop at every red light regardless of the situation

 

 

Avatar
Must be Mad | 8 years ago
4 likes

What really annoys are the lights which sense -and wait for- motor traffic.

So apparently its "safer" for me to stop at a deserted junction wait, sometimes several minutes for a car to turn up and then continue, now with the car or cars right behind me than it would have been for me to carry on my merry way with no motor traffic anywhere near me. 

Avatar
Leviathan replied to Must be Mad | 8 years ago
3 likes

Must be Mad wrote:

What really annoys are the lights which sense -and wait for- motor traffic.

So apparently its "safer" for me to stop at a deserted junction wait, sometimes several minutes for a car to turn up and then continue, now with the car or cars right behind me than it would have been for me to carry on my merry way with no motor traffic anywhere near me. 

In these situations I deploy 'Sunday morning protocols' act as you would at an unlit junction.

Avatar
durandal replied to Must be Mad | 8 years ago
1 like

Must be Mad wrote:

What really annoys are the lights which sense -and wait for- motor traffic.

So apparently its "safer" for me to stop at a deserted junction wait, sometimes several minutes for a car to turn up and then continue, now with the car or cars right behind me than it would have been for me to carry on my merry way with no motor traffic anywhere near me. 

 

If you find one that doesn't trigger for a bike (notwithstanding non-conductive carbon contraptions, obviously!), then you should give the local highways authority a ring. They can and do tune them, but they need to know about them first.

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to durandal | 8 years ago
3 likes
durandal wrote:

Must be Mad wrote:

What really annoys are the lights which sense -and wait for- motor traffic.

So apparently its "safer" for me to stop at a deserted junction wait, sometimes several minutes for a car to turn up and then continue, now with the car or cars right behind me than it would have been for me to carry on my merry way with no motor traffic anywhere near me. 

 

If you find one that doesn't trigger for a bike (notwithstanding non-conductive carbon contraptions, obviously!), then you should give the local highways authority a ring. They can and do tune them, but they need to know about them first.

And if my bike is carbon?

Tempted to just sit there blocking cars from reaching the sensor and cause a jam.

Avatar
Gasman Jim replied to durandal | 8 years ago
1 like

durandal wrote:

Must be Mad wrote:

What really annoys are the lights which sense -and wait for- motor traffic.

So apparently its "safer" for me to stop at a deserted junction wait, sometimes several minutes for a car to turn up and then continue, now with the car or cars right behind me than it would have been for me to carry on my merry way with no motor traffic anywhere near me. 

 

If you find one that doesn't trigger for a bike (notwithstanding non-conductive carbon contraptions, obviously!), then you should give the local highways authority a ring. They can and do tune them, but they need to know about them first.

But carbon is conductive.

 

Avatar
Paul_C replied to durandal | 8 years ago
0 likes
durandal wrote:

Must be Mad wrote:

What really annoys are the lights which sense -and wait for- motor traffic.

So apparently its "safer" for me to stop at a deserted junction wait, sometimes several minutes for a car to turn up and then continue, now with the car or cars right behind me than it would have been for me to carry on my merry way with no motor traffic anywhere near me. 

 

If you find one that doesn't trigger for a bike (notwithstanding non-conductive carbon contraptions, obviously!), then you should give the local highways authority a ring. They can and do tune them, but they need to know about them first.

most of the junctions around me have not extended the sensors or added extra sensors in the cycle lane leading to them... sometimes, the only cycle specific sensors are only in the main box itself, which most of the time, you can't get into cos some moton has gone halfway over their stop line leaving no room for you...

Avatar
pakennedy replied to Must be Mad | 8 years ago
0 likes

Must be Mad wrote:

What really annoys are the lights which sense -and wait for- motor traffic.

So apparently its "safer" for me to stop at a deserted junction wait, sometimes several minutes for a car to turn up and then continue, now with the car or cars right behind me than it would have been for me to carry on my merry way with no motor traffic anywhere near me. 

 

Proceed with caution as the light is defective. Report the defective light using an app. I use Fix My Street.

Avatar
sswindells | 8 years ago
3 likes

Reading between the lines here this guy was probably not just tentatively passing through the lights after checking them. Nor was he likely to have been receptive to some unofficial advice given, because for him to go to court over it and receive such a hefty penalty, is not from an early guilty plea that's for sure. 

Well we all moan that these guys give a bad name to the rest of us, and vilify motorists when they do it and it's dangerous, so it is only right we should support that action was taken against this guy. 

The punishment seems somewhat excessive in comparison to more serious offences though, perhaps IAM should be petitioning the government to change the weight of sentencing and not the law, the law isn't the problem, it's the punishments that are unfair and weighted against cyclists. 

Avatar
1961BikiE | 8 years ago
5 likes

I disagree. You could argue that its ridiculous for any traffic to have to sit at a red light at a pedestrian crossing if there is no one crossing.

I think it would just muddy a poor situation that already exists.

Avatar
tritecommentbot replied to 1961BikiE | 8 years ago
2 likes

1961BikiE wrote:

I disagree. You could argue that its ridiculous for any traffic to have to sit at a red light at a pedestrian crossing if there is no one crossing. I think it would just muddy a poor situation that already exists.

 

Whats muddy about the difference between a bicyle and a car.

 

If people can't distinguish between themselves driving a car and being on a bicycle they shouldn't be on the roads.

 

Visual guide:

 

Car

//encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSkFmVKIzAA3w1uwHlzOZXunelEkgH3B2riQk5z75Rnv5Q8eQ1s)

 

Bicycle

//www.paper-bicycle.com/hustle/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/basket.jpg)

Avatar
imajez replied to 1961BikiE | 8 years ago
0 likes

1961BikiE wrote:

I disagree. You could argue that its ridiculous for any traffic to have to sit at a red light at a pedestrian crossing if there is no one crossing. I think it would just muddy a poor situation that already exists.

Anyone has been able to turn right [with care] on a red light in the US for 30+ years, unless a sign says otherwise.

Avatar
schlepcycling | 8 years ago
6 likes

Who get the £22 victim surcharge.....the red light?.

Avatar
kitkat | 8 years ago
13 likes

The strange world of crime & punishment.

£400 fine for an incident where no-one was hurt (see above)

£35 fine & 3 points for killing a cyclist (http://road.cc/content/news/73826-taxi-driver-fined-%C2%A335-3-points-his-licence-after-cyclist-killed-collission)

Avatar
vonhelmet | 8 years ago
4 likes

When I am king it will be a capital offence to push the pelican crossing button and then cross without waiting for it.

Avatar
tritecommentbot | 8 years ago
4 likes

The ridiculousness of a cyclist sitting at a red light, especially a ped crossing, when there is no one around for miles. Though watching automatons get irrate about it is good craic.

Pages

Latest Comments