Among the signatories to the letter are Jason Kenny, Laura Trott and Mark Cavendish, as well as past Olympic champions Sir Chris Hoy and Chris Boardman, who now acts as policy advisor to British Cycling and who features in a video released alongside the letter.
The letter is signed by all the Team GB track riders who won medals in Rio last month, other than Sir Bradley Wiggins, Stephen Burke, Ed Clancy and Philip Hindes.
Boardman said: “Britain is the best elite cycling nation in the world – we’ve proved it at three successive Olympic Games – and yet we’re still massively lagging behind other nations in terms of every-day cycling.
"How can it be right that we have so many Olympic champions but less than 2% of Brits cycle regularly? We know why people aren’t cycling. The fact is that most will only ride a bike if they are separated from traffic on convenient, well-maintained routes.
"How can it be right that we have so many Olympic champions but less than 2% of Brits cycle regularly?
“The ground work has been laid in that the government now legally has to come up with an investment strategy. But let’s see that published with a meaningful amount of money behind it. Under current proposals, investment will decline to less than £1 per head by the end of this parliament. This is a pitiful amount when you consider the £28 per head that is spent in the Netherlands on cycling.”
The letter, reproduced in full below, request a meeting between Boardman and May to discuss the points raised.
Prime Minister The Rt Hon Theresa May MP, 10 Downing Street, London SW1A 2AA
Thursday 1 September 2016
Dear Prime Minister,
The Great Britain Cycling Team athletes topped the cycling medal table for the third Olympic Games in a row at Rio 2016. It was a truly outstanding performance and enhances Britain’s status as the world’s leading elite cycling nation.
You were widely reported in the media as saying that there will be “no limits” on the honours that could be bestowed on our medal winners. But the best way to honour the achievements of our athletes would be a legacy of every-day cycling in this country – a place where cycling is the choice form of transport for people to get around in their daily lives.
Your predecessor called for a “cycling revolution” and your government’s manifesto sets out a target to “double” the number of journeys cycled. While some steps have been made, cycling is still a transport mode which does not enjoy the government investment or political leadership given to roads, rail or aviation.
The government is now considering feedback on the draft Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy (CWIS). We urge the government to publish this and set out a timeline to address the chronic underfunding and lack of leadership which is keeping cycling for transport in the slow lane. Only networks of segregated cycle lanes in towns and cities across the country can achieve and influence growth.
The success of the CWIS will be felt not only across government but in all areas of the nation’s life. The government’s sports strategy seeks to extend the number of people living physically active lives and could be truly transformative. Active travel – walking and cycling – is the easiest way for people of all ages to fit physical activity into their lives. Currently, only one in five people achieve the recommended levels of physical activity.
Around one in three children is overweight or obese. The government’s childhood obesity strategy recognises the value of physical activity and the importance of walking and cycling to school. I am sure you know that this will seem a fanciful idea for most parents without the convenient walking and cycling routes which would give them the confidence that their children will be safe getting to school. Yet we know it can be achieved – in the Netherlands, 50% of education-age children cycle to school.
As cities like Copenhagen and New York have shown, cycling also creates better places to live and work. More cycling cuts congestion, reduces noise pollution and fuels local economies. Small businesses in New York have seen a 49% increase in business where cycle lanes have been installed.
There is huge latent demand for cycling. Two thirds of people would cycle more if they felt safer on the roads. The government’s road safety statement reiterates the manifesto commitment to reduce the number of cyclists killed or injured. The CWIS needs to set targets to improve road maintenance, enhance enforcement of the laws, and update the rules of the road to better consider the needs of cyclists.
To make this happen, we need 5% of the government’s transport spend allocated to cycling. This is the only way that cycling will be integrated into transport strategy and given the priority it deserves.
Investment in cycling as a form of transport isn’t purely an investment in cycle lanes. It is an investment that will pay off for the nation’s health, wealth, transport infrastructure and the vibrancy of our towns and cities. It has the added benefit of just making it easier for ordinary families to get to work and get to school.
Our athletes have inspired the country and now we urge the government to take cycling seriously as a transport option for everyone.
British Cycling’s policy adviser Chris Boardman would welcome a meeting to discuss this further. We look forward to hearing from you.
Yours sincerely,
Chris Boardman, policy adviser, British Cycling and Olympic gold medallist
Sir Chris Hoy, six-time Olympic gold medallist, joint most successful British Olympian
Laura Trott, four-time Olympic gold medallist and Britain’s most successful female Olympian
Jason Kenny, six-time Olympic gold medallist, joint most successful British Olympian
Mark Cavendish, Olympic silver medallist
Joanna Rowsell Shand, double Olympic gold medallist
Callum Skinner, Olympic gold and silver medallist
Elinor Barker, Olympic gold medallist
Owain Doull, Olympic gold medallist Katie Archibald, Olympic gold medallist
Becky James, double Olympic silver medallist Katy Marchant, bronze medallist
Add new comment
21 comments
the problem's not so much about getting funding for cycling infrastructure, it's getting from that point to having infrastructure that's actually fit for purpose. Manchester, home of British Cycling, seems to be currently spending millions on making life harder for cyclists. Has anyone who even has a cobweb-covered bike in a garden shed been involved in any of the planning? It doesn't seem so from the work done so far.
Bit late to get my two-penneth in on this post...but...
this....
unconstituted [1193 posts] 8 hours ago 4 likes
You could even get organised about it. Start a massive protest group and have it rotate from constituency to constituency until you get loads of MPs on board.
plus this...
gunswick [22 posts] 2 hours ago 1 like
We need someone on the inside, CB for transport minister? Then we would have a chance of getting change...
equals...?
LCC had five years plus five years of getting all mayoral candidates to sign up to progressive cycling measures. After asking members to vote for the preferred way ahead they opted for Go Dutch -which morphed into Space 4 Cycling and finally asking for mini Hollands, CS routes and Quiet Ways.
Boris Johnson remains the politician to have done more to shift cycling forward (after lots of initial pushing and his deviating).
If he had a different job in the current government, I would like to think he'd be best placed than anyone to pursue the best options for cycling.
Other than that, unconstituted's suggestion for a massive floating protest group is a positive idea, though tougher to coordinate than city based protests (able to respond rapidly to events with flash rides and so on).
Regional based? With regular touring cyclists arriving to support local everyday cyclists (mums and children) where they exist.
Cycling UK should work with British Cycling on such events - along with the obvious city campaign groups.
Currently in London, it's September and we're still waiting for Sadiq to nominate his choice for a cycling (and walking) ambassador.
Whilst the needs of pedestrians are important of course, the point hasn't been made that a network of footways already exists. A road network also. But where do people aged 8 to 80 go if they want to cycle?
I'm surprised they didn't ask them to increase revenues by sorting out the law and schedule of fines for driving offences. It would be great and a little bit safer if every videoed punishment pass resulted in either the driver or registered keeper getting a fine of between 200 and a grand for example. Easy to do and if the registered keeper can't provide the driver tough!
Wouldn't it be easier to get the government to make more money? I know it might not make things safer really, but it would make me feel better!
i hope they start a decent campaign from it and we see some good come out of it.
Having visited Berlin recently. All I can say is Britain and London are so far behind in cycling infrastructure, it is laughable. Berlin is beautiful with endless dedicated routes and white lines continuing too and from every road. Drivers give way to let cyclists through.
We also visited a small town and cycled for 6km on shared paths and strrets. Again drivers waited for us to pass side junctions and gave plenty of space when passing slowly.
Germany seems to be really good at cycling infrastructure. I visited Berlin a couple of years ago and there were people on bikes (just ordinary people - not "cyclists") everywhere. My wife and I spent a week in Munich this year and again, there's cycle paths on both sides of every road. We hired bikes and spent a great day cycling round the busy streets whilst feeling completely safe and not even a hint of conflict with other traffic.
We all know the failings of UK cycling policy (big on rhetoric, very short on action) and the inadequacies of key organisations (I'm looking at you, Sustrans!). I do believe that St Christopher Boardman is a brilliant, passionate advocate for cycling who is wonderfully articulate in communicating the need for investment and the inadequacies of the current provision. However, even he has failed to acheive much.
Sadly, I think the only thing that will change things is if a high profile celebrity with national-treasure status, or a close relative of a senior politician, is killed whilst cycling.
It's unfair to say Boardman has failed when he has no power to make any decisions to actually change things.
I don't see it as a failure that is his fault. If only Chris Boardman could be given a position within government in some role, then we might see some real action. HS2 has happened because people in the system (notably Andrew Adonis) have been able to really drive it forward, and get access to the right people. We don't have an equivalent for cycling.
We need someone on the inside, CB for transport minister? Then we would have a chance of getting change...
Absolutely spot-on message that summarises precisely why we should be investing in cycle infrastruture.
Will anyone listen? Well, it's easy to be cynical but this sort of campaigning at government level is the ONLY way that things are going to change.
Kudos once again to Chris Boardman.
Might have more impact if the team defected en mass to the Netherlands or Denmark before the next olympics. 'We won't represent a nation that treats cyclists so badly'
Think positvely! Marginal gains.
Gov reply will be: "We're fully committed to turning Britain into a cycling nation, and we are spending more money on cycling provision than ever before".
Translation: "Sod off. This is Motorland."
MP's get these sorts of letters all the time from all sorts of lobby groups. Only thing that shakes MP's into action is appealing to their self-interest.
You have to gun for them in their local constituency, cause a lot of bother, then they look like they're failing there and shit themselves into taking up your cause.
Only way to get an MP to do something - make it in their personal interest. Basically electoral blackmail.
You could even get organised about it. Start a massive protest group and have it rotate from constituency to constituency until you get loads of MPs on board.
I wish them well on this but don't think it wil make one jot of difference to anything.
I suspect the Govt's policy for doubling the number of cycling journies involves making twice as many people so poor that they cannot afford to drive or use any other mode of transport... Thus they'll double the number of people using 'active travel' (cycling or walking) in one fell swoop
But if you don't try nothing will ever change!
It should be a great way to get people talking about it, athletes wanting bike lanes instead of meaningless gongs. If it changes the attitude of the public - which IME definitely happened after London 2012 - then it will certainly help our cause.
Aww - you think that the 2012 Olympics changed the attitude of the public toward cycling? Ahh, that's sweet.
What a pleasant, respectful comment!
I suspect the letter would have a greater effect if the accompanying video featured all the medal winners - more chance of going viral and that would put more pressure on politicians. They do tend to be swayed by public opinion if they think there are votes in it.
What a patronising twat.
I said "IME", which meant my own experience riding on the road daily. It's not my fault if you are struggling to cope with this being possible.
Fair enough - your experience clearly differs from mine. To be honest, I was trying to be humorous and nice about that rather than just saying I thought that you were an f-ing idiot. Hey-ho.
They should just cut out the middle (wo)man and throw that letter in the bin. The end result will be the same.