Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Include cyclists in London's average traffic speed figures urges Baroness Jenny Jones

"People on their bikes are certainly not grinding to a halt," says Green Party politician as TfL figures reveal motor vehicle gridlock on capital's streets...

Green Party politician Baroness Jenny Jones has urged that cyclists be included in figures used to calculate the average speed of London traffic.

The former London Assembly Member made the appeal in a letter to the Evening Standard in response to an article in the newspaper last week headlined Revealed: how average speed of London traffic has plummeted to just 7.8mph.

She wrote:

With the average speed of car travel falling, isn’t it time to include the average speed of cyclists in the figures?

The number of people taking to their bikes has grown tremendously in recent years and they now make up the majority of traffic on some rush-hour routes.

People on their bikes are certainly not grinding to a halt, far from it.

If we keep building safe, high-quality cycle tracks then the number of swift-moving Londoners is only going to grow and the amount of dangerous air pollution will fall.

Road safety campaigner Tom Kearney, who blogs at saferoxfordstreet.blogspot.co.uk, posted a copy of the letter to the Facebook page of the campaign group Stop Killing Cyclists.

> Protesters to target Treasury for cycling and walking budget

One commenter to that post, Ollie Craig, said: “Good letter but average cycling speed should be kept separate from driving speed just to show how much faster cycling is on distances up to 5 kms.”

Another, Faisal Husain, pointed out that some cyclists can be a lot quicker than people in motor vehicles over longer distances.

He wrote: “I average around 18-21mph on my 10 miles commute to work.

“I am sure it will be a dream for car drivers to reach Moorgate from Woolwich in 26 mins.”

> Separating bikes from traffic can halve pollution exposure, study finds

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

15 comments

Avatar
wycombewheeler | 7 years ago
0 likes

7.8mph would be an improvement on my commute.

Days when I have to take the car are the worst.

Avatar
Critchio | 7 years ago
0 likes

You get used to air quality. A recent trip to London from the coast where I live in East Anglia I found the air was terrible and it left an aftertaste in my mouth. Disgusting. Pollution really is bad in the big city centres and vehicle use needs to decline. It's going to get much worse too until something drastic is done. Electric vehicle use en mass is way in the future but that won't solve congestion just help with air quality. Best option now is for people to get on bikes.

I also don't see the mentality of a commute by car taking an hour yet by bike it takes 25 mins. People still take the car.

Avatar
flathunt replied to Critchio | 7 years ago
1 like

Critchio wrote:

I also don't see the mentality of a commute by car taking an hour yet by bike it takes 25 mins. People still take the car.

Well, it's over an hour they don't have to spend with their families so I can manage a little empathy.

Avatar
frogg | 7 years ago
7 likes

And please, take into account the time it takes to park the car and then walk to the real destination ... The trick is you can park your bike almost at the real destination.

Avatar
Hensteeth | 7 years ago
2 likes

Unfortunately I don't think you will ever get your average person out of their car. They are in love with their pride and joy and look at cycling as a childish pursuit undertaken by wierdos and poor people. Maybe in London it might happen but nowhere else.

Avatar
sw600 | 7 years ago
9 likes

“I am sure it will be a dream for car drivers to reach Moorgate from Woolwich in 26 mins.”

Also a dream in this chap's head. No way you can (safely) average 23 mph cycling in London during rush hour.

I average about 25 kph if I'm lucky on my commute (17km), which involves not jumping red lights or acting like a dick. Still faster than the traffic though.

Avatar
Armstrong's_balls replied to sw600 | 7 years ago
0 likes
sw600 wrote:

“I am sure it will be a dream for car drivers to reach Moorgate from Woolwich in 26 mins.”

Also a dream in this chap's head. No way you can (safely) average 23 mph cycling in London during rush hour.

I average about 25 kph if I'm lucky on my commute (17km), which involves not jumping red lights or acting like a dick. Still faster than the traffic though.

He's a noob. Evidently he read his Strava average moving time as a total journey average.

Avatar
crazy-legs | 7 years ago
0 likes

What is needed is an app (hey, everything needs an app these days!) where you put in your start & finish destination and it gives you a real time report of how long it'll take and how much it'll cost in a simple list:

Car, bus, tube, bike, train.

I know TfL and Google both operate similar things but it's usually for one mode of transport at a time and then you get complicated things like changing trains/buses etc. Willing to bet that for the vast majority of cases within any big city the bike will win hands down for fastest and cheapest.

And yes, I know that in some cases you'll have tradesmen, etc who cannot use any other means of transport but we urgently need to shift people onto bikes and break this "car is king" mentality.

Including bicycle average speed in the figures is meaningless but publishing them as a separate entity alongside motor traffic average speeds would be brilliant. Car, 7.5mph; bike, 10mph. Might possibly get people to think beyond the "oh but I need a car..."

Avatar
kevvjj replied to crazy-legs | 7 years ago
1 like

crazy-legs wrote:

What is needed is an app (hey, everything needs an app these days!) where you put in your start & finish destination and it gives you a real time report of how long it'll take and how much it'll cost in a simple list:

Car, bus, tube, bike, train.

I know TfL and Google both operate similar things but it's usually for one mode of transport at a time and then you get complicated things like changing trains/buses etc. Willing to bet that for the vast majority of cases within any big city the bike will win hands down for fastest and cheapest.

And yes, I know that in some cases you'll have tradesmen, etc who cannot use any other means of transport but we urgently need to shift people onto bikes and break this "car is king" mentality.

Including bicycle average speed in the figures is meaningless but publishing them as a separate entity alongside motor traffic average speeds would be brilliant. Car, 7.5mph; bike, 10mph. Might possibly get people to think beyond the "oh but I need a car..."

Citymapper app does this mostly (for London at least)

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to kevvjj | 7 years ago
0 likes

kevvjj wrote:

crazy-legs wrote:

What is needed is an app (hey, everything needs an app these days!) where you put in your start & finish destination and it gives you a real time report of how long it'll take and how much it'll cost in a simple list:

Car, bus, tube, bike, train.

I know TfL and Google both operate similar things but it's usually for one mode of transport at a time and then you get complicated things like changing trains/buses etc. Willing to bet that for the vast majority of cases within any big city the bike will win hands down for fastest and cheapest.

And yes, I know that in some cases you'll have tradesmen, etc who cannot use any other means of transport but we urgently need to shift people onto bikes and break this "car is king" mentality.

Including bicycle average speed in the figures is meaningless but publishing them as a separate entity alongside motor traffic average speeds would be brilliant. Car, 7.5mph; bike, 10mph. Might possibly get people to think beyond the "oh but I need a car..."

Citymapper app does this mostly (for London at least)

As does TfL - athough both are only multi-modal for public transport modes.

And (in response to the orginal poster),  the private car isn't really king in much of inner - and certainly not central - London. Most motorised road users are freight, buses and taxis.

Avatar
I love my bike | 7 years ago
3 likes

If you seemingly have to disregard all traffic lights etc travelling into central London to boast how fast it is to cycle, you're probably doing more harm than good.

Even stopping at red traffic lights, I've found a fit cyclist can average ~12mph within zones 1&2, which is comfortably faster than 7.8mph for motor vehicles in central London, and not far from the 17.4mph average within Greater London.

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... | 7 years ago
5 likes

The way people on bikes are not counted as 'traffic', in more than one statistic, and almost invariably in politicians' comments, is yet another sign of how deeply irrational 'society' is about the topic.

We've got into a situation where the car itself is now the important thing, not human beings. So we care about how fast the big metal boxes can get around, rather than people. (It seems that for many, 'traffic' includes black cabs with no passengers, but not people on bikes actually going somewhere for a purpose)

I don't know if the stats should be reported separately. Because I fear that would just encourage the irrational idea that 'cyclists' are some strange group of non-people, and if those on bikes are travelling faster than those who choose to drive, that will just be taken by the car-fixated as evidence that those weird non-people are being favoured.

The point is more to emphasise that its the speed of movement of people that matters, and that bike lanes increase rather than reduce that.

Avatar
FatAndFurious replied to FluffyKittenofTindalos | 7 years ago
6 likes

FluffyKittenofTindalos wrote:

Because I fear that would just encourage the irrational idea that 'cyclists' are some strange group of non-people ///

You got it right in your intro - I believe we should report 'people on bikes' rather than 'cyclists', and 'people in cars' rather than 'motorists', to blur the line between 'them' and 'us'.

 

Avatar
brooksby replied to FluffyKittenofTindalos | 7 years ago
1 like

FluffyKittenofTindalos wrote:

The way people on bikes are not counted as 'traffic', in more than one statistic, and almost invariably in politicians' comments, is yet another sign of how deeply irrational 'society' is about the topic.

Here in Bristol they did a monitoring exercise of where traffic was flowing and not flowing around the city. One of the places that they monitored was on the M32, our urban motorway which pushes right down to the city centre. You know: a motorway, where cyclists aren't allowed to cycle.  And yet they still felt the need to report that there were no cyclists in that area during the period they monitored.

Avatar
CXR94Di2 | 7 years ago
9 likes

THIS

 Ollie Craig, said: “Good letter but average cycling speed should be kept separate from driving speed just to show how much faster cycling is on distances up to 5 kms

 

To highlight that its faster, healthier, cheaper to go by bike!

Latest Comments