Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

'Single file, the safest style' sign appears on Yorkshire road

Organisation responsible for the sign says that a close pass operation will be launched later this month

Chris Boardman has been among those to criticise a sign put up on a Yorkshire road, advising cyclists ‘single file, the safest style’.

The sign was put up by the 95 Alive York and North Yorkshire Road Safety Partnership, a partnership of local authorities, emergency services and other North Yorkshire agencies.

Responding to the tweet, Boardman suggested: “Should read 'single file, wait a while' as the group is twice the length, making it harder to pass not easier (well, if giving enough room).”

Boardman can be seen explaining why cyclists can – and do – ride two abreast in a 2015 cycle safety video co-funded by the Bicycle Association and British Cycling.

MartGT, who published the photo, said that in his opinion the sign was on a road where single file would endanger cyclists.

There was also criticism from Martin Porter QC, who suggested that drivers might look at the sign “and decide it is justifiable to 'enforce' this advice.”

The 95 Alive Twitter account said that the sign was “just one part of the safety campaign,” and added that a version of West Midlands’ police’s close pass operation would begin later in the month.

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

36 comments

Avatar
Man of Lard | 7 years ago
16 likes

Isn't it strange how all of these campaigns start with cyclists. Rarely seem to start with the actual cause of the danger & frustration - motons.

Avatar
Russell Orgazoid | 7 years ago
11 likes

Yes, go single file so idiots can "nip past" or more to the point, "squeeze past too closely".

Muppetry. But drivers will listen, unfortunatley.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 7 years ago
28 likes

Probably road.cc should delete the account of anyone who is plainly just here as a wind-up merchant. Also, anyone who gets their kicks out of pathetic and obvious trolling should probably take a look at themselves and ask a few questions.

Avatar
Sniffer replied to HarrogateSpa | 7 years ago
7 likes
HarrogateSpa wrote:

Probably road.cc should delete the account of anyone who is plainly just here as a wind-up merchant. Also, anyone who gets their kicks out of pathetic and obvious trolling should probably take a look at themselves and ask a few questions.

I suspect they did, but Willo came back.

Avatar
davel replied to HarrogateSpa | 7 years ago
9 likes
HarrogateSpa wrote:

Probably road.cc should delete the account of anyone who is plainly just here as a wind-up merchant. Also, anyone who gets their kicks out of pathetic and obvious trolling should probably take a look at themselves and ask a few questions.

Yeah I wasn't in favour of Willo's first ban: he came at some debates from different angles and, while he's only ever responded to the points he wants to debate, he chatted enough about other topics. He actually contributed a bit.

This time round, his motor-fellating trolling ratio has been off the scale. The twat can't get banhammered quickly enough.

Avatar
paulrattew | 7 years ago
44 likes

Ignoring bikelikebike's normal trolling, anyone who sees these signs should just take them down

Pages

Latest Comments