Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

The Times apologises after labelling graph of deaths and injuries TO cyclists as 'deaths and injuries caused BY cyclists'

Removes two graphs, says it was ‘an honest mistake’

The Times has apologised after labelling a graph of deaths and serious injuries suffered by cyclists in the UK as “deaths and serious injuries caused by cyclists in the UK”. The graph accompanied the newspaper’s article about a 73-year-old woman who died following a collision with a cyclist on London’s Oxford Street earlier this week.

The graph was first brought to the newspaper’s attention by Peter Stuart.

 

 

However, the mystery was soon unravelled. As cycling campaigner Bez put it:

 

 

Mark Treasure also spotted a problem with a second graph.

 

 

After this was pointed out, The Times removed the graphs from the article, initially stating that this was due to “scaling errors” before eventually revising this to just plain old “errors”.

 

 

Interactive news editor at The Times, Sam Joiner, apologised for what he said was an ‘honest mistake’.

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

27 comments

Avatar
burtthebike | 7 years ago
2 likes

The Times is no longer a newspaper with any concern for the facts or important stories.

With NKorea in possession of nuclear weapons and launching intercontinental missiles, a bombing on the tube, threatened public service strikes, today's headline was about a royal adviser.

No longer the Thunderer, not even the Whimperer, merely the Utterly Irrelevant.

Avatar
BehindTheBikesheds | 7 years ago
0 likes

What the chart handily shows though with respect to KSIs of people riding bikes is that the numbers have gone up despite a lower level of increase in cycling (So safety in numbers is BS so far)This is in comparison to a decrease in pedstrian casualties over the same period (I'll dig the chart out for that shortly). Funnily enough the start of the increase happened shortly after UCI and british cycling mandated helmet wearing and the big push by certain groups for everyone to wear them.

it's not just the Times though, it's all media outlets who make these 'errors' (yeah, whatever!) even the BBC misrepresent stats all the time in a way that shows a clear bias/agenda, they ignore complaints about them breaking their own code of conduct regarding such.

And my FB friends wonder why I get a bee in my bonnet about how people on bikes are treated.

 

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 7 years ago
0 likes

Just as well they did take the graphs down. Some people may have equated the drop in cyclist casualties since the 1990s as being due to helmets. Then where would we be?

Avatar
Applecart | 7 years ago
0 likes

An honest, but very annoying and potentially damaging mistake. Good that they've retracted and apologised.

Avatar
oldstrath replied to Applecart | 7 years ago
3 likes
Applecart wrote:

An honest, but very annoying and potentially damaging mistake. Good that they've retracted and apologised.

You actually believe that was an honest mistake? Bought any good bridges recently?

Avatar
brooksby | 7 years ago
1 like

"An honest mistake" - yeah, right... 

Avatar
severs1966 | 7 years ago
3 likes

I complained to The Times a couple of years ago about the tone of one of their articles regarding cycling. They presented, in their defence, the "fact" that they were running a long-term campaign to encourage cycling.

They seem now to have abandoned this campaign, if it ever was a real thing, and joined the rest of the media in trying to convince the public that bike riding is cosciety's current most severe evil and must be stamped out before it kills thousands.

My personal suspicion is that they were never in favour of anything to do with cycles.

Avatar
Ush replied to severs1966 | 7 years ago
2 likes
severs1966 wrote:

I complained to The Times a couple of years ago about the tone of one of their articles regarding cycling. They presented, in their defence, the "fact" that they were running a long-term campaign to encourage cycling.

 

A lot of these bicycle safety campaigns seem like a variant of "concern trolling".  If they can't find a wicked cyclist out trying to mow down pensioners then they have to revert to worrying about how cycling (which is ballpark as safe as cycling and driving) is "too dangerous" and needs special helmets and special bikelanes.

Avatar
Simon E replied to severs1966 | 7 years ago
1 like
severs1966 wrote:

I complained to The Times a couple of years ago about the tone of one of their articles regarding cycling. They presented, in their defence, the "fact" that they were running a long-term campaign to encourage cycling.

They seem now to have abandoned this campaign, if it ever was a real thing, and joined the rest of the media in trying to convince the public that bike riding is cosciety's current most severe evil and must be stamped out before it kills thousands.

My personal suspicion is that they were never in favour of anything to do with cycles.

It was a typical reaction when one of their own journalists was crushed by a lorry. It appeared to be a single-handed effort by Kaya Burgess.

Avatar
Tynedoc | 7 years ago
3 likes

That's another newspaper I won't be buying again. The list of acceptable ones is getting short...

Avatar
Leviathan replied to Tynedoc | 7 years ago
1 like
Tynedoc wrote:

That's another newspaper I won't be buying again. The list of acceptable ones is getting short...

Who buys newspapers anyway?

Avatar
brooksby replied to Leviathan | 7 years ago
0 likes
Leviathan wrote:
Tynedoc wrote:

That's another newspaper I won't be buying again. The list of acceptable ones is getting short...

Who buys newspapers anyway?

I considered it one weekend, only to discover that one of those fat weekend editions was about £4!

Avatar
mike the bike replied to brooksby | 7 years ago
0 likes
brooksby wrote:

I considered it one weekend, only to discover that one of those fat weekend editions was about £4!

 

Really?  My Sunday Times is £2:70 (although I pay only £2:00 on subscription)and lasts me all week.

Avatar
1961BikiE | 7 years ago
5 likes

And as said above, why remove the graphs altogether rather than show the corrected ones? And the answer is obvious - that would not serve to further the anti cycling cause. Always show the information that suits your needs, not a reasoned argument.

Didn't the Times run a Pro cycling campaign a few years back? Obviously who ever was behind that is long gone.

Avatar
whobiggs replied to 1961BikiE | 7 years ago
0 likes
1961BikiE wrote:

And as said above, why remove the graphs altogether rather than show the corrected ones? And the answer is obvious - that would not serve to further the anti cycling cause. Always show the information that suits your needs, not a reasoned argument. Didn't the Times run a Pro cycling campaign a few years back? Obviously who ever was behind that is long gone.

 

My thoughts exactly!

Avatar
1961BikiE | 7 years ago
6 likes

NorthEastJimmy - I hope you got license plate and are going to report it. That is not the attitude for any driver, let alone a professional driver and at that one who could well be going to attend to a RTA.

Avatar
ChrisB200SX | 7 years ago
6 likes

If only there was a process where, say, an Editor, check and approves the story before it's published.
#alternativefacts #fakenews
Why haven't they added the correct graphs?!

Avatar
Bluebug replied to ChrisB200SX | 7 years ago
1 like
ChrisB200SX wrote:

If only there was a process where, say, an Editor, check and approves the story before it's published.
#alternativefacts #fakenews
Why haven't they added the correct graphs?!

They are part of News International.  I presume you have heard of phone hacking? Well that shows how though their editors are...

Avatar
whobiggs replied to Bluebug | 7 years ago
2 likes
Bluebug wrote:

 

 Well that shows how though their editors are...

 

Thorough yes

 

Avatar
stonojnr | 7 years ago
1 like

Maybe it's just because it's Friday,drivers minds are wandering toward the weekend but it did feel drivers felt close passes were fair game again today ,& similar to the few days after the Alliston case,I particularly liked the truck who close passed approaching a red light,who as I repassed before turning right at the lights was driving one handed because his other hand was holding a cigarette out the window

Avatar
alansmurphy | 7 years ago
17 likes

"As a cyclist myself" is like Big Ron Atkinson "I have many friends who are black"...

Avatar
NorthEastJimmy | 7 years ago
7 likes

Damage has been done, think of the thousands that have viewed that and now uses it to justify their anger towards people who happen to ride bikes.

Got close passed today at a pinch point by a Rapid Response Paramedic (no flashing blues). Caught them up in traffic and the driver said I shouldn't be on the road as we're a menace to others as well as ourselves.  Fellow paramedic in the passenger seat just grins like it was the highlight of his week.

Avatar
ChairRDRF replied to NorthEastJimmy | 7 years ago
6 likes
NorthEastJimmy wrote:

Got close passed today at a pinch point by a Rapid Response Paramedic (no flashing blues). Caught them up in traffic and the driver said I shouldn't be on the road as we're a menace to others as well as ourselves.  Fellow paramedic in the passenger seat just grins like it was the highlight of his week.

You really, really need to report this.

I think what annoys me more than the actual incident is  just sticking a report of it on the comments page. What on earth do you think you are going to achieve?  Most of the people reading this have had similar experiences. Why bother telling us. Just record the incident, complain and let us know if anything posiitive happens.

Avatar
Bluebug replied to NorthEastJimmy | 7 years ago
1 like
NorthEastJimmy wrote:

Damage has been done, think of the thousands that have viewed that and now uses it to justify their anger towards people who happen to ride bikes.

Got close passed today at a pinch point by a Rapid Response Paramedic (no flashing blues). Caught them up in traffic and the driver said I shouldn't be on the road as we're a menace to others as well as ourselves.  Fellow paramedic in the passenger seat just grins like it was the highlight of his week.

In London we have single responders who use either push bikes or motorbikes as that's the only way to get through congestion.

So these idiots think it is fair to run over their own colleagues?

 

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 7 years ago
15 likes

There's an anti-cycling bandwagon. Facts, logic, and perspective aren't allowed to get in the way.

Good that they removed the wrong and misleading graphs, but I suspect the damage has already been done.

Avatar
Simmo72 | 7 years ago
7 likes

I have a more accurate chart that represents incompentant research & journalism.

Avatar
danthomascyclist | 7 years ago
14 likes

Instead of deleting it, why didn't they just correct it? Seems like a simple correction.

I guess it doesn't match their narrative...

Latest Comments