Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

road.cc live blog: Airborne cyclist video, Deliveroo rider unfazed by flooding, renewed call for Government to change cycling laws - and more

All today's cycling news from this website and beyond...
 

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

4 comments

Avatar
alansmurphy | 6 years ago
1 like

On the Briggs matter, I'm sure he's had a pretty awful last couple of weeks but I'm not sure it would have been the first thing on my list to do in 2018...

Avatar
CygnusX1 | 6 years ago
1 like

brooksby wrote:

Can someone more mathematically inclined than me tell me whether the variations in those numbers actually mean anything at all??

 

I suspect your question was rhetorical, but the road.cc news blog already has your answer:

road.cc wrote:

Furthermore, any variation is statistically insignificant - the number of convictions has fluctuated between four and twelve, with no real pattern, over the last ten years.

...

brooksby wrote:

And, if the laws are so out of date, how come people nevertheless get convicted under them?  I didn't realise laws have a 'use-by' date.

This.

brooksby wrote:

I wish the Govt would get on with the general review of road traffic laws that was promised (how many years ago now...?)

And this.

 

Avatar
brooksby replied to CygnusX1 | 6 years ago
0 likes

CygnusX1 wrote:

brooksby wrote:

Can someone more mathematically inclined than me tell me whether the variations in those numbers actually mean anything at all??

 

I suspect your question was rhetorical, but the road.cc news blog already has your answer:

road.cc wrote:

Furthermore, any variation is statistically insignificant - the number of convictions has fluctuated between four and twelve, with no real pattern, over the last ten years.

That wasn't on the live blog when I was writing my post, so... 

Avatar
brooksby | 6 years ago
1 like

On the Briggs matter: the Sky News figures state as follows

Convictions relating to dangerous cycling

2014 - 24

2015 - 23

2016 - 26

Convictions relating to careless or inconsiderate cycling

2014 - 96

2015 - 85

2016 - 63

Can someone more mathematically inclined than me tell me whether the variations in those numbers actually mean anything at all?? 

I wonder what the comparable numbers/variations are for motorists over the same period?

And, if the laws are so out of date, how come people nevertheless get convicted under them?  I didn't realise laws have a 'use-by' date.

I wish the Govt would get on with the general review of road traffic laws that was promised (how many years ago now...?)

Latest Comments