Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Cyclist who broke six ribs on CS6 says it is not obvious white line is a raised kerb

New stretch of CS6 opened last month with vertical kerbs separating cyclists from vehicular traffic

A cyclist who broke six ribs after a crash on London’s Cycle Superhighway 6 (CS6) says it is not obvious that the lane dividers on a recently opened stretch are actually raised.

The London Evening Standard reports that Max Hotopf fell after hitting the painted 10cm high ridge that separates cyclists from vehicles in Farringdon Road, just north of the Clerkenwell Road junction.

Transport for London (TfL) said the accident was the first involving the raised white line to be reported to them.

Hotopf said: “I have been cycling on London’s roads for 40 years so I am very experienced. It looked like a normal white line. There was nothing to suggest it was raised. I hit it and went flying and now I have these injuries.

“This is badly thought out and TfL need to come up with some answers. They need to put up warning signs. It’s so easy not to spot the danger.”

This stretch of the cycle superhighway opened last month and campaigners had suggested the vertical-sided kerbs could prove dangerous.

Hotopf added: “It’s only a matter of time before someone else is seriously hurt. They need to sort it out — the cycle lane is supposed to keep riders safe, not injure them.”

TfL has launched an investigation and said: “Safety is our top priority and we always closely monitor new cycle lanes.”

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

35 comments

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 6 years ago
16 likes

So not raised enough to keep motorised traffic from transgressing, but raised just enough to trip a cycle? I'm sure that this would not be very obvious in low light or in the reflected glare on a rain slicked evening under street lights.

TfL should change their motto to "We haven't really thought this through".

Avatar
earth | 6 years ago
1 like

Make it taller.

Avatar
ktache | 6 years ago
9 likes

Looks to me like they really didn't think about it.  The protection from the motorised traffic seems little better than paint, but for the cyclist much more dangerous.

TheRantyHighwayman has written about kerbs a great deal, I doubt if the Dutch would have done it.

Avatar
mike the bike | 6 years ago
9 likes

 

What is it with councils that the simplest thing invariably turns into a fiasco?  Had they bothered to ask even the dumbest cyclist they would have been told that this idea was a non-runner.  Are they too arrogant to seek advice or too stupid to know they need it? 

It reminds me of our local authority who top-dressed a 3-mile shared-use track with billions of tiny arrowhead flints and were deluged with complaints from cyclists, dog walkers and horse riders.  In response all they could do was parrot the same old tired line about it being good enough for Kew Gardens, where incidentally, cycles and horses are banned.  It took over two years to sweep the track of this menace and restore sanity.

Avatar
chineseJohn replied to mike the bike | 6 years ago
5 likes
mike the bike wrote:

What is it with councils that the simplest thing invariably turns into a fiasco?  Had they bothered to ask even the dumbest cyclist they would have been told that this idea was a non-runner.  Are they too arrogant to seek advice or too stupid to know they need it? 

This is such a common scenario.

Same with organisations that "think" they've installed cycling facities like racks where you can only lock a front wheel. nothing to lock the frame. All they have to do is ask employees......

Pages

Latest Comments