Jeremy Vine calls out Jeremy Clarkson over criticism of cycling school run mum

Actually Vine I've seen dangerous people in all forms of transport, even just when walking.

Clarkson should be recycled into the rubber used for condoms and distributed at an STD clinic.

Frankie Boyle aint wrong, JC is a cancer growth https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qrCrxixBKY

Sounds like Clarkson is advocating for less cars on the road and more cycling infrastructure. Someone give this man an ebike so he can stop moaning about bicycles.

Clarkson himself is one of the reason why drivers are dangerous. He spent years on TV encouraging people to drive like twats

On a similar note, I had a thought along the lines of Clarkson's the other day.

I had decided to not cycle to work as there were forecast 50-60mph winds and I thought that would be rather dangerous to cycle in. I ended up walking to work as all the trains were cancelled due to overhead cables down, trees on line etc. due the the really bad storm we had. Whilst I was walking along (thinking how glad I was that I was not cycling in this weather) a lady passed me on her bike with her child on the back of it in a child seat.

I was left wondering if I should be concerned that this lady had decided to put her child at risk in a situation that I was not willing to risk myself or if I had misjudged the situation and should just man up and cycle in such weather.

Clarkson says roads are dangerous

Vine says roads aren’t dangerous, cars are

I would argue Vine is just as incorrect, disappearing cycle lanes, poor road surfaces, inadequate parking/parking restrictions for bike lanes etc.

Why is road.cc giving this story publicity?

A ghost writer has knocked out a silly season article in the guise of ‘angry man’ in a deliberate attempt to cause controversy.

Feuds are perceived to good be for the media as they are self-perpetuating and need little input from the paper. This story is an extended dig at the ‘elitist’ BBC via Jeremy (?) Vine and the Guardian.

I doubt that the supposed author even saw the copy before someone forwarded a link to him. Happy to be proved wrong, but celebrity columnists are paid for their name above the article, not for the contents.

Paraphrased as: "Pathetic cad says something stupid"

I know that the term 'cad' may be a targe archaic but what term better covers some pointless little multimillionaire twunt, 'friend' of prime ministers and senior newspaper editors, who goes around beating up the staff  - cowardly little cunt.

Can somebody more social media savvy than I please tweet this toJeremy Clarkson ?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-39356514

Thank you.

Clarkson would make a good inner tube.

Only comment I would make to the mother is that I think it is safer to follow your children rather than the other way around.  That way you can stick yourself further out in to the road so that the vehicles have to give the children a little more clearance.  Also you can see what the children are doing and if required call instructions to them.

I don't read newspapers. They don't contain news, they contain opinions.

Cunt says cunty thing.

I give Vine thumbs up whenever I've cycled past him in Hyde Park recently. I'm not sure I'd give the same hand signal to Clarkson, who is trying to drag us back to the stone age.

He's an agent provocateur. Or, in Anglo-Saxon, a shit-stirrer. Or, in internet-speak, a troll. Let not thy shit be stirren, as it says in the Bible. Maybe.

Clarkson himself admits he doesn't believe the things he writes. People should stop giving it attention. That's what he wants. That's what he's good at. That's how he is minted

“motorist who ran over the child would get some serious jail time.”

If only! 

I'd genuinely forgotten Jeremy Clarkson.  No need to bring him back TBH.