An ongoing study into people’s transport choices in seven European cities, including London, has found that as a way of travelling in an urban environment, cycling has the greatest benefits for both physical and mental wellbeing.
Led by the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal) and published in the journal Environment International, it’s by no means the first study to reach such a conclusion, and it certainly won’t be the last.
The study is part of the EU funded PASTA project, which quizzed residents of seven European cities – Antwerp, Barcelona, London, Örebro, Rome, Vienna and Zurich – about their travel choices, and how they perceived their health.
More than 8,800 respondents completed a baseline questionnaire, of whom 3,500 also completed a final survey, with the modes of transport asked about being car, motorbike, public transport, bicycle, electric bicycle and walking.
In each analysis of the results, cycling came out top – people had a better perception of their general and mental health, had more vitality, lower self-perceived stress and felt less loneliness.
Lead author Ione Avila-Palencia of ISGlobal said: “Previous studies have either analysed transport modes in isolation or compared various transport modes to each other.
“Ours is the first study to associate the use of multiple urban transport modes with health effects such as mental health and social contact.
“This approach allowed us to analyse the effects more realistically, since today’s city dwellers tend to use more than one mode of transport.”
She continued: “It also allowed us to highlight the positive effect of walking, which in previous studies was not very conclusive.”
Nor were there concrete conclusions regarding modes of transport besides cycling and walking, which was found to have the second-greatest benefits.
“Driving and public-transport use were associated with poor self-perceived general health when the transport modes were analysed separately, but this effect disappeared in the multiple-mode analyses,” she said.
“The findings were similar in all of the cities we studied. This suggests that active transport—especially cycling—should be encouraged in order to improve health and increase social interaction.”
She added that since cycling’s modal share “remains low in all European cities, except in countries like the Netherlands and Denmark, which means that there is plenty of room to increase bicycle use.”
Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, co-ordinator of the study and director of the Urban Planning, Environment and Health Initiative at ISGlobal, said: “Transport is not just a matter of mobility; it also has to do with public health and the well-being of the population.”
He said that the study showed that “an integrated approach to urban planning, transport planning and public health is needed in order to develop policies that promote active transport, such as adding more segregated cycle lanes in Barcelona, which are transforming the city into a better environment for cyclists.”
Add new comment
11 comments
Yet another pro-cycling report that the government will start ignoring absolutely immediately. As Chris Boardman said, we don't need more consultations or research, we know what works, we've known for decades, but we still spend all the money on more roads and ego schemes like HS2. We have had report after report, government papers, policies, strategies and empty promises, none of which amount to a hill of beans.
If we want change, then we have to start pushing our elected "representatives" the ones who make the spending decisions. We need to hold councillors to account and embarrass them in public when they fail to deliver, but this means working together, not just motivated individuals, who need all the help they can get. Sign up to your local bike campaign group, and a national organisation which agitates for proper cycle provision like Cycling UK. Don't just vent off on sites like this, get involved.
Either that or upsticks and move to Utrecht before it's too late.
I have been wondering whether I would miss hills *that* much.
Of course they’ll ignore it. There’s no bungs to be had making people happy and healthy.
is it just me or does the crack addict actually look hotter in the 'after' picture?
The picture's not very good quality.
I think this one shows the difference more clearly:
2000-before-meth-during-meth-after-meth-14041777.png
It's just you.
It’s because we’re all so smug and self satisfied from jumping so many red lights.
.
addicts-before-and-after-alcohol-cocaine-crack-cycling-true-or-815568.png
But what about hazelnut addicts? (c'mon, you know you want to...)
112087519_b83fdcc4f3.jpg
I thank you