Two professors in Scotland have outlined how they believe encouraging more people to cycle, walk and use public transport can dramatically improve the lives of people in cities through reducing air pollution and promoting healthier lifestyles.
Adrian Davis, professor of transport and health at the Transport Research Institute, Edinburgh Napier University and Professor Chris Oliver, a retired surgeon who was chair in Scotland for Cycling UK from 2012-14, shared their thoughts in a column for The Scotsman today following Edinburgh’s first car-free day last Sunday.
“With the declaration by Nicola Sturgeon of a ‘climate emergency’, we outline here why sustainable transport must be understood as critical in any strategy for Scotland to go ‘further and faster’ in tackling climate change,” they wrote, going on to describe transport as an “Achilles’ heel” in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
They cited a Sport England study that found that “town and city-wide active travel interventions are the most effective at increasing walking, cycling and overall physical activity,” as witnessed for example by the uptake of travelling by bike in three former Sustainable Towns, Peterborough, Darlington and Worcester/Redditch, which benefited from increased investment from 2004-09, with cycling and walking levels maintained in the ensuing years.
“The major mode share for sustainable travel across much of continental Europe is not culturally driven,” they continued. “It is because decade in, decade out funding has been at over £10 per head of population.
“In urban areas cycling could be a normal, everyday activity by 2040. The latest Sustrans Bike Life report predicts in Edinburgh alone, with adequate funding, that by 2040 just by more cycling, 47,000 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions would be saved annually, equivalent to the carbon footprint of 10,000 people,” they added.
You can read the full article here.
Add new comment
22 comments
If we simply swapped from mph to kph for all national speed limits our world would be a much better place. Of course the Daily Mail brigade would go potty.
No it wouldn't because people will still speed if there is no/little enforcement and/or punishments that act as a deterrent.
I don't want to go to kilometres, there's no need to, simply changing the limits ie, lowering them and then enforcing them or even better designing motors that absolutely have to obey speed limits 100% of the time and scrub off a % for when it rains/wet ground, when around schools, built up areas, where pedestrians or people on bikes are in close vicinity, roads with parked cars etc etc so that there's a margin of error and hence why it's a maximum limit not a target as so many driving instructors and the gov seem to forget!
Good on the Welsh Assembly taking this move. Meanwhile the Scottish Govt has stepped back from their plans for a default 20mph urban speed limit leaving it to the local authorities to decide. So we’ve non existent infrastructure, no urban speed limit, a justice system that sides with the motorist and the govt expect the modal share to leap from below 2% to 10% in six months. The country is facing a health meltdown due to obesity and diabetes and car use is climbing and all they can do is widen roads and build bridges to encourage vehicular transport rather than active travel. It’s enough to make your blood boil.
In the UK people have been charged with hate speech for less
These people and sites are deliberately divisive
In the UK people have been charged with hate speech for less
These people and sites are deliberately divisive
In the UK people have been charged with hate speech for less
These people and sites are deliberately divisive
In the UK people have been charged with hate speech for less
These people and sites are deliberately divisive
In the UK people have been charged with hate speech for less
These people and sites are deliberately divisive
I wonder why there isn't much news on Ignacio Echeverría, the cyclist that went to help police stop the knife wielding terrorists back in 2017 and posthumously received the George Cross, given how much media the attack has had recently.
Oh and don't read the FB page of the fake Drivers for Registration of Cyclists, it really highlights how Australians think about people on bikes/human lives, their entitlement as drivers and their total lack of understanding of road safety.
Two of the stories here seem to be about Australian cyclist-haters. Was Australia founded by people from Peterborough? It sounds like a literal 'Daily Mail Island'.
Probably because he used his Skateboard so they have jumped on that aspect instead. Maybe he should have thrown his bike at them instead so he would have been known as "The Immigrant who assautled a Pedestrian with a bicycle".
In all seriousness I was at a National Police Citizen Bravery awards ceremony on 30th October as my wife was recieving an award and I don't think there was a dry eye in the house when him and the nurse were awarded theirs posthumously as well (accepted by family members).
"3 points if you pass a bicycle with more than .75 metres clearance.. we shall discuss on @BBCRadioScot . I bet you all love cyclists."- John Beattie
Errr, shouldn't that be less than?
Thats alright then: I thought it was me being dumb, when actually it was mr beattie
What do you bet that he hates the idea you can get points from speed cameras, too?
Outrageous that drivers should be punished simply because they got caught breaking the law. It's PC/Health and Safety/ Broken Britain gone mad!
The story of Mr X and the Drivers for the Registration of Cyclists website is utterly bizarre, and compulsive reading; I've read thrillers less entertaining. Many thanks for posting this item.
https://cyclingtips.com/2018/08/finding-mr-x/
The watch out for dumb fucks on bikes thing I wouldn't mind, if they actually looked out for dumb fucks on bikes, but having made the mistake of going to that facebook page, I think it's just an excuse to call people on bikes dumb fucks.
I'm presuming that there's supposed to be an ASL under those HGVs?
I can't help but wonder how many cyclists there are under those HGVs.
On a slightly related note, I was driving in London a few weeks ago and stopped at traffic lights next to a police car (I was in the left lane). Whilst the lights were still red, it crept into the ASL box, then past the second stop line. When the lights turned green, the driver turned left in front of me (from the right/straight lane) and put the left indicator on. I really wish I had a dash cam for that.
$50,000. So that's what all the fines on cyclists were for.
If that were true the reward would be millions.
There can't just be one person putting tacks on cycle paths in Melbourne - Australians seem to be pretty high up on the cycle hating scale. There's every chance that they might have to make dozens of payouts.