Look’s new Geo-Trekking 2-in-1 pedals combine a flat body ideal for commuting in regular shoes, with a recessed single-sided clipless mechanism for going adventure and gravel riding.
The new Geo-Trekking range of three pedals - Geo-Trekking, Geo-Trekking Grip and Geo-Trekking ROC - has been designed to meet the diverse needs of riders from the urban commuter to the enthusiast e-mountain bike rider.
Featuring a flat and clipless side in the same body, Geo-Trekking’s versatility means that it can tackle almost every riding situation and condition, providing the rider with a flexibility of riding and choice of shoes and style, along with an unparalleled freedom of spirit.
The clipless side is based on a mechanism compliant with the micro cleat standard, compatible with an SPD cleat. This mechanism features across the entire range and provides simple and secure clip-in and clip-out, with an easy adjustment system enabling a tension adjustment range of 5-10Nm. All of the pedals are supplied with the X-TRACK EASY cleat with 30% easier clip-inand more natural multidirectional clip-out than regular SPD cleats.
On the flat side, LOOK have created three separate designs to meet the specific needs of the rider. The Geo-Trekking model features a 84mm-wide composite body with lightweight, molded spikes to offer versatile performance and grip in varying conditions, while Geo-Trekking Grip has a completely filled flat side with a soft elastomer material to increase traction without damaging the soles of the rider’s everyday shoes.
The Geo-Trekking ROC version features an 83mm-wide aluminum body to withstand impacts and scratches, intended primarily for off-road use, offering maximum adhesion to the flat side thanks to its wider body and eight alloy traction pins situated around the edge of the pedal.
Both the Geo-Trekking and Geo-Trekking ROC models are also available in ‘Vision’ formats, featuring additional detachable LED lights for added essential visibility. Unlike a standard light fitted in a fixed position on the bike, pedals are subject to circling motion, which considerably increases their visibility by creating an oscillating beam from in front and behind.
The new pedals are priced from €59.90 and will be available from 15th October.
Add new comment
14 comments
The only sick days I've taken were when I crashed into a massive pothole and ended up in hospital. This was a few days after telling my co-workers they were all mad paying money for the privilege of going to work on the tube.
How do you monitor who cycles to work regularly though? The existing incentive schemes don't require that you actually log your cycling commutes, whereas a reward system presumably would need to in order to prevent abuse. Easy enough to do, but not everyone wants to have to log their commutes and hand that data over to Strava / their employer (though for an extra day's holiday, maybe...) Would be interested to know how many fewer sick days the average cyclist takes than the average non-cyclist though - wouldn't one extra day of holiday wipe out the benefit to the employer?
Separately:
"More than a fifth say they get a sense of superiority when they overtake cars sitting in heavy traffic.
Almost four-fifths are therefore liars."
I know this is meant as a humorous aside, but maybe four-fifths simply don't like the phrasing of the question. It is possible to ride for objective reasons (like it being faster than driving) without feeling superior to others for doing so.
Just throw in a test statement every once in a while to identify frequent cyclists. Something like, "drivers are so considerate these days" or "I'm glad no-one uses their phone whilst driving anymore" or "that helmet saved their life".
My current workplace monitors it through the building access system. A swipe in the car park barrier is a day of cycle commuting, assuming you don't have an assigned car parking space. This system is used to track usage, as there is "limited space" in the bike racks; people who aren't regular cycle commuters get their access revoked.
Currently, you need to swipe in just once a month to be classed as a "regular" cycle commuter.
There is an 18-month wait for access to the mostly empty bike racks.
Worra joke. Once a month is certainly regular but it's very far from frequent. If there is a waiting list then I'd argue that if there are fewer than 2 commutes in a given fortnight then it should revoked (while making allowances for holidays etc).
Does the same applies to a car pass - drive to work and occupy valuable real estate once a month to keep it?
No problem where I work, we have a big warehouse adjoining the office. As I'm the only cycle commuter so I get to park my bike under cover. But even better are the views on my rural commute.![yes yes](/sites/all/themes/rcc/images/smilies/4.gif)
If UK bicycle imports in the first half of 2019 are the lowest for more than a decade how can Argos claim that "Our data shows that sales of adult bikes have risen almost 70 per cent in the last three years"?
https://road.cc/content/news/265913-survey-says-commuters-who-switch-cyc...
Yep, tht photo's right up to date...
Yes, yes we should get an extra day (at least) for regularly cycling. Not biased at all.
Also, Chocolate Path - mmmmm!
You know the photo that flips as an optical illusion between old lady and squirrel or something...?
I have always seen that stock photo road.cc use as their "commuters" photo and thought it was on the B&B Railway Path, but you're right - its the (sadly closed for the forseeable future) Chocolate Path, isn't it?
I think they're looking to spend £5million to fix it, or they've squandered the money to decide where to begin looking for a plan on producing a timeline on which option to pursue for the stadium. https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/council-set-aside-5-million-1097440
Optical illusion you say?
ardillas2.jpg
I suspect that money will now just go into the pot for nuking the Plimsoll Bridge to create "Western Harbour".
So are you suggesting that hawkins peter is really an old lady rather than a red squirrel?
I had meant one of those pictures where it's so obvious what it is, then it flips and it's completely obvious that it's something different. But, now that you put it like that...![3](https://cdn.road.cc/sites/all/modules/contrib/smiley/packs/smilies/3.gif)
Are you assuming my gender and/or species?
I sort of do already, indirectly... I have an informal agreement wth my boss that as long as my work is done and no customers are awaiting my attention that afternoon, I can tootle off a bit earlier on my bike (in company colours on the clothing of course) . . he'd generally OK with it as apart from saving him the costs of diesel, he saves (the equivalent of) £10 per round trip in road tolls during rush hour times. (costs are doubled from 7am-9pm when you pass the sensors) Given it's not unknown for me to do a 60-70km ride in the morning on my way to work, and be finished in the shower before any of the others actually turn up, he knows I'm not actually skiving real work.