Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Police set the law straight after car passenger's 'use the f*cking bike lane' rant at cyclist

Cyclist was riding alongside Mini Holland bike lane in Enfield - quite legally, as Met pointed out

Police in Enfield, north London, have reiterated on social media that cyclists are not obliged to use cycle lanes after a video appeared on Facebook with the passenger of a car shouting at a rider to “Use the f*cking bike lane!”

Monday moaning: Why don't cyclists use cycle lanes

The passenger adds: “They spent millions on the bike lane. F*cking use it, you mug,” while the cyclist continued to ride along, ignoring the rant.

The video was filmed on Monday on Green Lanes and uploaded to a Facebook page called Spotted Enfield, with the comment “£42 million well spent, indeed.”

The Metropolitan Police Service in Winchmore Hill, which Green Lanes runs through, wrote yesterday on Twitter: “Sadly it has come [to] my attention that there were two road rage incidents yesterday evening on Green Lanes.

“In both incidents motorists laid into cyclists for not being in the cycle lane. One you can view in Spotted Enfield.

“Kudos to the cyclist for trying his best to ignore the driver’s abuse!

“In the second incident a bus driver laid on his horn for a very long time behind the lady riding in front.

“Please think of the cycle lanes as a safe space for insecure cyclists and children.

“Not ALL cyclists will use them all the time and that is their right.”

Rule 63 of the Highway Code says “Use of cycle lanes is not compulsory and will depend on your experience and skills, but they can make your journey safer,” and often faster-moving cyclists will avoid them particularly on routes with many side roads, as is the case with Green Lanes.

That £42 million figure mentioned on Facebook refers to the total amount being spent under Enfield Council’s Mini Holland scheme after it won £30 million in funding from Transport for London.

As with a similar scheme in neighbouring Waltham Forest, the project met with strong opposition from some locals.

However, as this article from Clare Rogers of Better Streets for Enfield and Enfield Cycling Campaign explains, people opposed to the initiative indirectly helped highlight its benefits.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

31 comments

Avatar
srchar | 4 years ago
7 likes

This stretch is a hotspot for abuse from drivers. I've had someone try to force me back into the lane using their car and I've also had a bus driver lean on his horn, overtake and then brake test me.

The cycle lane is borderline unusable - it's basically a mile of conflict with pedestrians and bus users, often positioned in the door zone and crossing many side streets where the give way is compeltely ignored. It's more dangerous now than it was before they spent the money.

The only positive is that it really confuses drivers when you respond to their cries of, "Why did we spend (20/40/100) million quid on you lot?" with "I agree, it's shit, that's why 'us lot' don't use it."

 

Pages

Latest Comments