The Telegraph article, titled 'Cycling trend backed by Stormzy and featured on The One Show sparks safety fears', says that the One Show's coverage of the Bikestormz youth movement resulted in a backlash, mostly because the youngsters featured were not wearing helmets.
Bikestormz rideouts often involve youths riding en masse in urban areas: “We’re trying to get the youth, like me, into riding bikes and not joining gangs, doing drugs", says a young boy in The One Show segment.
The Telegraph article says that footage shows 'helmet-free youngsters riding alongside police officers', but fails to mention that they were not actually breaking the law by forgoing protective headgear. They quote Catherine Maddy of brain injury association Headway, who says: “We know how easy it can be to sustain a life-changing brain injury as a result of a cycling accident.
“Our position is based on key peer-reviewed research and expert opinion from leading neurosurgeons, coupled with the commonsense approach that wearing a cycle helmet will offer greater protection to one's fragile skull than not wearing one.
“Our message to all cyclists is please use your head, use a helmet.”
Alternatively, Cycling UK say they are opposed to mandatory helmets and helmet promotion campaigns in their headline message on their website: "Neither enforced helmet laws nor promotion campaigns have been shown to reduce serious head injuries, except by reducing cycling. The remaining cyclists do not gain any detectable reduction in risk, and they may lose some of the benefits from 'safety in numbers'.
"So instead of focusing on helmets, health and road safety professionals and others should promote cycling as a safe, normal, aspirational and enjoyable activity, using helmet-free role-models and imagery. Individual cyclists may sometimes choose to use helmets, either for confidence or because of the type of cycling they are doing. However, they should not feel under any pressure to wear them. For the sake of our health, it is more important to encourage people of all ages to cycle, than to make an issue of whether they use a helmet when doing so."
Add new comment
19 comments
Yep - Zwift definitely got that wrong - they should've painted a little white diamond around the base of the post.
I reported that group and Facebook do not feel that the cycling hate group goes against their community 'standards'
They just advise blocking it.
If the Beemer driver doesn't hand in their licence, the justice system should remove it forever.
That was pretty awful. I could see the barriers coming towards me too.
I went out for a llittle ride this afternoon, bit parky. I had waited for the hail to pass.
Got to the top of Caversham, Gravel Hilled it as the bridleway up would have been far too filthy. I saw 15-20, maybe more, Red Kites circleing around and catching thermals and wind currents. Never seen so many, I have been impressed by seeing 5 at a go.
What are they all living on?
Also, I thought that today was as good as any to remove my seatposts from the bikes, clean and grease, and insert. Better to do it before they seize in there for ever.
I'm not sure which article this was apropos to, but this was pretty zen, and a bit of a change to all the close passes and helmet arguments. We all need to regrease our nuts from time to time.
We have to be relevant now?
Sheeeeet......
Oh yeah, I got on to the filter list host for adblock and got them to sort out the comments section, so you'll be able to see them now with adblock
Who would have thought that the Torygraph would be so pro-helmet?
Personally, I think Stormzy is doing a great job getting kids to connect with cycling instead of fighting each other.
No surprise they went to a head injury campaign group who, surprise surprise, are pro-helmet.
They should be speaking with Cycling UK who could give them info on the actual cycing risk (low) or Carlton Reid who'll gladly point out that it's vehicle occupants who should have compulsory helmets as they are at a far far greater risk of head injury. That's where Headway should focus its energy.
Driving, walking, stair use and especially showering helmets, come on Headway, they are all a commonsense approaches.
The headway spokesperson is so predictable. How about the thousands of head injuries suffered by the occupations of motor vehicles who end a drain on our nhs, they never have anything to say about that do they.
how has this not made Road.cc news yet?
https://www.facebook.com/groups/stopkillingcyclists/permalink/2474192356...
incredible really, can only be good if you're anti car I think
The parents at that school - if it's the one I think it is - are always having a go at the cyclists using the Railway Path. Problem is that they have to come out of the school and cross the Path, and it isn't a real road so they don't see any need to check before crossing. Granted, some (but not all, and not even most) cyclists do go fast along there, but there are (there seem to be) constant calls for speed bumps, zebra crossings, etc.
I'd like to think this will turn out to be some Nathan Barley 'too satirical for you' type site, but...
Remind me again - irrational hatred of random people because of their chosen mode of transport isn't a hate crime because...?
I can't be arsed with cretins like the ones responsible for this Facebook page, so I reported it for hate speech, hopefully a few others will as well, and this one will be flushed down the proverbial Facebook toilet fairly soon.
Push pedal foot down?
When a government takes away some rights, such as freedom of movement, it is always a spur to those who want even more rights taken away (from people other than them, of course.)
And today's golden crowbar award goes to...