Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Add new comment
4 comments
Standard of proof is pretty high to bring case of causing death by dangerous driving. You have to show that the standard of driving fell "far below what would be expected of a competent and careful driver", which often means providing evidence of bad driving leading up to the actual incident. It can take a long time to put such a case together.
Bit of a catch22 then. Is it little wonder that so few end up being prosecuted. I was fortunate when I got caught up in a hit and run a lot of years ago. The driver that hit me had been followed by another driver from when he had got into the car with a skinful. Police were able to add the charge of careless driving with failure to report and leaving the scene. The bugger still got a 6 month suspended driving ban as he required his licence for his business.
Not mentioned in the police statement, I'm afraid. We did have a comment to another story recently from someone working within the criminal justice system who outlined some of the reasons why investigations into RTCs could continue for some time before the CPS decided to press charges; a year still seems a long time, however.
A whole year..? Why so very long?