Last month we reported how Boris Johnson had revealed very rudimentary plans for an elevated cycle path over London, and now a firm of architects has produced sketches of how the project, with the working name SkyCycle, might look.
Sam Martin, a landscape architect and director of Exterior Architecture, has apparently been in discussions with the Mayor of London and Network Rail since May about using disused railway lines above ground in a network linking mainline railway stations across the capital.
"TfL estimate the number of journeys made by bike will treble to around 1.5 million by 2020. Where are they meant to go? SkyCycle is the next logical step, because you can’t realistically build more cycle lanes on ground level.
"You have to start knocking down buildings and there will always be the problem of traffic. It will be less safe than it is now and you can’t persuade people to get on bikes as it is even if you keep raising taxes on cars.
"Boris loves the idea and Network Rail are really positive about it. I sincerely believe it could be the next significant piece of London infrastructure and would transform the capital.
"It has been compared to New York’s High Line, which I am familiar with, but the reality is this is a completely different concept."
Mr Martin's plans include a pay-as-you-ride Oyster service, which he proposes costing £1 per journey, with a corporate sponsor like Barclays helping to fund the construction costs.
It is thought the first route could be built on the Olympic regeneration of east London, linking Stratford with the City of London through Liverpool and Fenchurch Street stations but this has yet to be confirmed.
Help us to fund our site
We’ve noticed you’re using an ad blocker. If you like road.cc, but you don’t like ads, please consider subscribing to the site to support us directly. As a subscriber you can read road.cc ad-free, from as little as £1.99.
If you don’t want to subscribe, please turn your ad blocker off. The revenue from adverts helps to fund our site.
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
On the one hand, I quite like the idea of riding along above the clogged, polluting traffic.
However, if building this kind of infrastructure requires tolls then why do other road construction projects not incur a charge?
Also, why should cyclists have to pay to use a new facility when there is a perfectly good ground-level one available? The roads are only considered dangerous because of the selfish bastards driving cars, vans and lorries who have zero respect for other road users. Why not do something about that instead?
Carlton Reid wrote:
The only real solution is to take space away from cars.
Or remove the cars from the space. They're our streets too.
Add new comment
32 comments
Won't work. Has been mooted many times before, from early days of motoring through to the bonkers car-fixated 1970s.
See http://www.sevenstreets.com/city-living/ghost-streets-5-the-floating-city/
And here's Jamie Tomkins - son of Crud - with 'cycling pipes' from 2007:
http://quickrelease.tv/?p=322
The only real solution is to take space away from cars.
On the one hand, I quite like the idea of riding along above the clogged, polluting traffic.
However, if building this kind of infrastructure requires tolls then why do other road construction projects not incur a charge?
Also, why should cyclists have to pay to use a new facility when there is a perfectly good ground-level one available? The roads are only considered dangerous because of the selfish bastards driving cars, vans and lorries who have zero respect for other road users. Why not do something about that instead?
Or remove the cars from the space. They're our streets too.
Pages