- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Justice (Lonpicman, Wikimedia Commons)Driver who lost consciousness and killed cyclist given suspended sentence
A 73-year-old motorist who killed a cyclist has received a six-month suspended sentence after pleading guilty to causing his death through careless driving, although medical experts are not certain if he fell asleep at the wheel or whether undiagnosed Parkinson’s Disease lay behind the incident.
Cyclist James Greenwood, aged 74, died in hospital from multiple injuries sustained when he was struck from behind by a car driven by John Plummer on Darlington Back Lane in Stockton last November, reports the Northern Echo.
Sentencing Plummer at Teeside Crown Court, Judge Peter Bowers said: "This sort of case raises a lot of emotions, and I have to be careful that I reflect in any sentence not only the tragic outcome, but also the culpability you must bear for the death of another human being."
David James, defending Plummer, said in mitigation that he was unaware that he was suffering from Parkinson’s disease and that he was not feeling tired prior to the incident.
He added that Plummer, who lost his partner when she was killed by a vehicle on a zebra crossing ten years ago, did not plan to drive again.
Shaun Dodds, speaking for the prosecution, said that speeding was not a factor in the case, and that Plummer recalled having seen Mr Greenwood and getting ready to overtake him.
The court heard from neurological experts who revealed that Plummer had been suffering from undiagnosed Parkinson’s Disease which could have caused the incident, although they believe it is more likely that it was due to his falling asleep momentarily at the wheel.
Plummer had admitted causing death by careless driving at his trial last month, but denied the more serious charge of causing death by dangerous driving, according to a report in the Evening Gazzette.
“In light of all the material and evidence that the prosecution now have they are taking the position not to proceed against you the charge on the first count,” said Judge Lee Spittle, who was sitting at the trial.
“They have accepted your plea on the lesser charge of causing death by careless driving,” the judge added.
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Latest Comments
- eburtthebike 12 min 10 sec ago
Is that Shakespeare, Wordsworth or......
- CyclingInGawler 18 min 16 sec ago
On behalf of all South Australians, we thank you, and you're forgiven for your initial error
- FatAndFurious 6 hours 54 min ago
I'm not known for my imagination. What are folk hoping to see? We have events, races, leagues, workouts, clubs, free rides, group rides, portals to...
- mark1a 8 hours 13 min ago
No problem at all old chap, its successor the CAAD13 is available in mechanical 105 11sp guise (not too shabby a groupset IMO with Shimano trickle...
- David9694 9 hours 7 min ago
Car crashing into Colchester Co-op sees two hospitalised https://www.gazette-news.co.uk/news/24719022.car-crashing-colchester-co-...
- . . 9 hours 19 min ago
I have two of these (I use one on the front with the red LED turned off and taped up) and think they are great, at least in daylight Plenty of...
- Prosper0 10 hours 8 min ago
No offence to Endura, but same advice as to Rapha, I actually have all the kit I need, for probably several years. You need to go and win the next...
- chrisonabike 14 hours 3 min ago
Ah - yes, they've got an American Star the wrong way round (means the child carrier needs rearranged though). Or it could be a Facile but inverted?
- lesterama 15 hours 56 min ago
What a bunch of ases
- quiff 16 hours 49 min ago
It was only your comment in the carousel that first brought me here, and yet I still managed to read most of the page before remembering this isn't...
Add new comment
11 comments
Like Speedy And Doc above I have grave reservations about the fact that the court did not take away this persons licence. I would have thought that it was a given in a case such as this.
It may be that the man may not plan to drive again, to quote his lawyer, removal of licence and an order to pass an extended test should he wish to do so again would help to ensure it. All after a stiff driving ban of course.
The medical idea is OK, after all everyone who drives a car is in charge of at least 750kg of metal moving at significant speeds close to vulnerable humans, peds or riders. This is an awesome responsibility when considered like this and is not to be granted or taken lightly. I would have no problem with a regular check on fitness, reaction times, eyesight before applying for a renewal of licence to drive.
Did they take the driver's license away from him - just to make sure that he doesn't drive again?
Judge Lee Spittle, sounds like he is right out of the Wild West, 'Dang it Joharn, I told yerzs to drive careful now. You've only gone and run over one of them there cyclistic fellas. Be more careful next time.' Frontier justice for bikers.
The culpability you must bear! He just let him off with killing someone. I'm sure they are sorry, he doesn't plan to drive again after all, but another motorist gets away with murder.
stumps, I know you meant cyclists, just where do you draw the line? horses and cyclists don't have a licence, are we to say a kid is to have a medical before they go out to play?
Yes there are some who would call for licencing, same as the road tax lot carry on about bikes not being taxed, which if bikes were taxed by the current emmission based rules would cost them more money????
mrmo - sorry mate, should have made myself clearer - obviously not peds but all other road going vehicles.
Car drivers would all be rather alarmed if they thought that those dangerous HGVs were being driven by people that were medically unfit (https://www.gov.uk/become-lorry-bus-driver/licence-validity-and-renewals).
stumpy not so sure, afterall car drivers are licensed to use the road, bikes, horses and pedestrians aren't? Would anyone call for compulsary medicals for all pedestrians before they are allowed out?
mrmo - your right but it will open a whole can of worms with pressure being put on all road users to follow suit with similar tests and the added prospect of insurance for bike users - albeit that would be impossible to oversee.
Is there a case for proper medicals? Nothing is perfect but the current system....
Drivers have to understand driving is a privelege not a right! Which means tests and medicals to insure drivers are fit and safe.