John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.
He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.
Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for CyclingNews.com. Along with road.cc founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for BikeRadar.com and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.
John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of TotalWomensCycling.com before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.
He joined road.cc in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.
Add new comment
2 comments
35 miles commuting plus 4 miles walking the dog today, should live till I'm a hundred. Unless one of those "inactive" car drivers gets me first
Stands to reason being active swings things in your favour, but there's no certainties in this world. So enjoy it while you can.
I have read undergraduate essays with more real or new scientific content than this. Surely be sedentary and not smoking is better than sedentary and smoking? What about going for a nice walk and stop for a full english and a bucket of beer at the end?
There is no doubt that inactivity is a problem, so is smoking and drinking amongst others, but to put a report out in this manner is discussing, I could conclude that people that smoke are going to be generally more inactive because they dont have the lungs to get out (even though until a week ago i did)
You could draw a conclusion, that in general active people are healthier because they understand that a better diet or healthy lifestyle enables them to be more active.
More to the point you can conclude anything you like, but with a lack of actual scientific research, this means nothing
im sure we will never see this is a peer reviewed journal at any time soon