Morning everyone, here’s a reminder of how insane pro cyclists are… and also why (most of) you and I would never be pro cyclists…
Pogačar who was on a well-deserved vacation after his heroics at the Tour de France that saw him win the yellow jersey for a third time, is back on the bike and preparing for the Grand Prixes of Québec and Montreal coming up this week, before the big showdown to claim bragging rights on the rainbow jersey at the road race world championships in Zürich on 29 September.
And the Slovenian, who was also on a hiatus from social media during his two-week vacation, is back posting on Instagram, and with yesterday’s post, has broken the cardinal rule of never-post-your-numbers on the internet that most pros swear by, giving us the all-important data to crunch some numbers and find out his closely guarded functional threshold power.
His latest post on Instagram (coupled with the ultimate hype song by Indian rapper Hanumankind that’s taken the world by storm) shows the 25-year-old on a 6 hour 20 minutes ride from Monaco along the French-Italian border, paced by a Vespa of all things and apparently joined for a bit by Aussie rider Michael Matthews as well. He shows his Wahoo Elemnt Roam cycling computer a couple of times in the short clip, but the real good stuff lies at the end of the video, when just for a split second, his end-of-ride is visible — most importantly, his training stress score, or TSS.
If you aren’t aware of this metric (I know, yet another acronymic metric that’s not going to have any real impact on my Sunday 50-mile ride but will still have me stressing for no reason), put simply, it’s a way of measuring how much stress is put on the body from a ride, with Garmin’s guide suggesting that a TSS below 150 means recovery for the ride will likely be finished by the next day, while anything between 300 to 450 will likely keep you tired for several days after the ride.
Pogačar’s TSS on the computer was 390, and now with some complex formulae developed by sports scientists, amateur cyclist who’s interested in sports physiology Ryan Rodman has thankfully already done the number crunching, and found that for 6hr 20min ride, Pogačar’s FTP would’ve been somewhere around 415W.
And if the website ProCyclingStats is to be believed, Tadej Pogačar weighs around 65kg, which would mean his Watts per kg would be around 6.5W/kg.
Yep, you read that right…
Fans have already started speculating that that Pogačar is well on his way to stun the competition once again at the UCI Worlds, although he’s bound to face stiff competition from the likes of double-Olympic gold winner Remco Evenepoel, Biniam Girmay and current men’s champion Mathieu van der Poel.
Mark Collop on Twitter said: “All this says to me is that he is ready for the WC and a rainbow jersey,” while James Hilbard wrote: “I feel like the average person fails to grasp how alien/ insane these kind of numbers are.”
Meanwhile, the Instagram account Blackcyclistsnetwork commented on Pogačar’s post: “Only Pog can make the life of a pro cyclist look fun and painless,” while Alessandro Colorà, speaking for most of us, said: “I think I wouldn't be able to keep up with you on a Vespa either.”
Former pro cyclist Alessandro Proni who last rode for UCI Professional Continental team Vini Fantini–Selle Italia in 2013 and won a Tour de Suisse stage in 2007, told Pogačar to “never put watts on the reel screen, you might have on your conscience the lives of many people”, to which another person commented: “He’s taunting us mortals”. I don’t think they’re wrong…
Add new comment
14 comments
A friendly reminder that the plural of Grand Prix is Grands Prix...
Is it worth asking the social media team at Have I Got News For You to do better than this?
"Cyclists are to be given AI technology that means they won’t have to stop at red lights, although they seem to be handling this quite well by themselves"
https://www.facebook.com/groups/794529223949148/posts/8228963280505668/
(Yes, I appreciate HIGNFY is satire. But this sort of thing is what gets cyclists abused.)
Will Road CC pick up on this?
"...biker crashes into pedestrian"
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/crlry1rd9w3o
Two points:
1) Whilst not condoning the idiot on the electrike motorcycle (or whatever it was) I think the pedestrian pulls his right arm out of his pocket and in some way holds it out which the idiot then hits.
You can see it by slowing down the clip.
2) The result of the impact is why I am not usually concerned about idiot cyclists on pavements. The idiots themselves are the ones most likely to be hurt.
I've already submitted another complaint to the BBC as the headline was "Cyclist on e-bike crashes into pedestrian". Pursuant to my last complaint, the vocabulary was misrepresentative towards cyclists as the vehicle is not an e-bike but an electric motor bike. Evidenced by appearance and the fact that the rider in question admitted to motoring offenses, not charges against the OAtPA 1861 which includes the "Wanton and furious" charge.
It appears that has been corrected at least
My question is how can he be banned from riding when it doesn't require a licence?
It does require a licence, it's a motorbike.
It requires Licence, insurance, MOT, VED declaration (nothing to pay as an electric motorbike, but still needs to be declared), and motor vehicle use certified helmets to be worn by rider and passengers.
It said cyclist on ebike when I first saw it, now changed to 'biker' much more appropriate.
It certainly looks like the pedestrian assaults the moped rider
I don't blame him tbh, motorbike heading towards him at speed in a pedestrian zone
Indeed. See
https://road.cc/content/forum/bbc-confuses-motorcycle-e-bike-deliberatel...
Thanks.
I don't check the main news section and it did not appear to be posted on the blog.
Whilst I do not condone violence...
The rider was riding at excessive speed on an area which is evidently not meant for motor vehicles.
The rider rode towards and exceptionally close to the pedestrian, probably in an attempt to intimidate/scare him and thus feel "empowered" when it had plenty of space to pass more safely (which is debatable anyway given the speed etc).
I'm glad the pedestrian didn't appear to be significantly hurt by the impact, regardless of whether he intended the rider to fall off by extending his arm/hand.
Basically, the rider was an idiot.
He F-ed about and found out the results of its actions.
Don't for a moment think I am defending the motorcyclist! But I'd rather see the story portrayed truthfully - plucky pedestrian's adroit reflexes rain karma on motorcycling yob.
And consider this - had the motor vehicle in question had four wheels instead of two, and there was no conflation with "e-bikes" and the concomitant menace of cyclists, do you suppose more might have been made of the pedestrian's outstretched hand "hitting the vehicle"?
No - it wouldn't have led to the driver falling off/over/out but could have caused injury to the pedestrian. Slapping the outside of a vehicle might sometimes lead to road rage from the driver, but it's not considered to be assault/illegal etc.
Sometimes?
A harmless twanging of a sprung door mirror tends to lead to threats of violence/attempted GBH/assault with a motor vehicle in my experience.
I really do strongly advise against it, a driver that has already provoked your harmless reaction by needlessly endangering you is more likely to be an unhinged sociopath who'll then deliberately drive into you.