Ah, Charlotte Gill, we’ve missed you.
The GB News producer has had a pretty interesting year on the live blog when it comes to questionable anti-cycling rants.
Back in January, you may remember, Gill penned an article for the conservative magazine The Critic, criticising a recent study on Low Traffic Neighbourhoods – without actually addressing any of the study’s findings.
Instead, the article was filled with the imaginative, original mutterings of the devout anti-cycling bingo enthusiast, including timeless gems like: “All across the UK, a war is being waged against car drivers”, “a ‘Lycra Lobby’ of cycling activists and eco wonks”, “I don’t drive, enjoy cycling and probably have a relatively low carbon footprint”, “an assault on democracy”…
And then, in March, she argued on the social media platform formerly known as Twitter that it’s mums who should stand up and oppose the dreaded Lycra lobby – because they can’t “cart around children” by bike, apparently – a claim swiftly shut down by Bath bicycle mayor, and bike riding carter of children, Saskia Heijltjes.
> “Oh dear, can you imagine being a mum carting around children”: Bath’s bicycle mayor shuts down GB News producer’s claim that mums need cars
And now, as if to mark the passing of another season, Gill has been at it again, this time taking aim at the decision to lower the speed limit on most of Wales’ 30mph roads to 20mph, a reduction that will come into force next month.
The GB News producer was responding to a thread Wales Online journo Will Hayward, who outlined why he believes that the 20mph limit is “a really good bit of policy”.
> Wales set to reduce default speed limit to 20mph in residential areas
“Easily the biggest argument for the 20mph limit is around safety,” Howard wrote. “Imagine a kid runs out into the street and a driver slams on the brakes. At the point a 20mph car would have stopped, a 30mph car would still be doing 24mph.
“Estimates suggest that if all current 30mph limit roads in Wales became 20mph limits, that six to ten lives would be saved and 1,200-2,000 casualties avoided each year.
“But we don’t need to rely on estimates, there are loads of real life examples we can draw from. From 1994 there was a widespread introduction of 20mph zones in Hull, and by 2003, there were 120 zones covering 500 streets.
“In the areas with the 20mph zones there was a decrease in total accidents of 56 percent and in fatal and serious injuries of 90 percent. The biggest reductions were pedestrian casualties, which fell by 54 percent, child casualties, which dropped by 54 percent, and (I think most importantly) child pedestrian casualties, which fell by 74 percent.”
Despite Howard’s use of facts and figures to assess the need for lower speed limits of residential roads, Gill decided to criticise the soon-to-be-implemented 20mph limits in the only way she knows how: by bringing cyclists into it.
“I’ve noticed that a lot of cyclists have accidents,” she wrote in response to Howard’s thread.
“I think it’s time they all had stabilisers. It would make them and other people a lot safer. Therefore cyclists need stabilisers nationwide.”
The future of cycling? According to GB News, anyway…
While some people tried to work out if the producer’s tweet was just another ill-fated attempt at humour (and, hey, as your resident live blogger, I’m hardly one to talk), others were scathing of the head-scratching comparison.
“I don’t think stabilisers would have helped when I was hit from behind at a red light by a taxi,” replied Matthew. “Or another time when a man in a Lexus did the same. Or when someone threw their car door open without looking and sent me to A&E.”
“1,558 deaths in 2021 from cars. 111 from cyclists. Many of which are from being hit by a vehicle,” noted Keith. “Most common cause of car accidents? Not paying attention to surroundings. Perhaps cars should have great big beanbags taped to them. It would make them and other people a lot safer.”
Climate activist Jon Burke added: “Drivers in the UK kill 100 cyclists a year. And 500 pedestrians. 20mph zones save lives, but Charlotte opposes them. LTNs are twice as effective at saving lives as 20mph zones. Charlotte opposes them, too.”
Meanwhile, others were simply happy that Gill’s tweet provided her typical GB News audience with the opportunity to read Hayward’s stats-focused take on 20mph limits.
Well, at least the backlash has temporarily stopped Gill’s seemingly daily anti-cycling hot takes…
Wait, what’s that? She’s still banging on about cyclists?
I for one am shocked, shocked I tell ya…
Add new comment
22 comments
I agree with the GB news guy. There's so much terrible driving out there that many motorists need to be treated like children. They've shown that they can't be trusted at 30mph, so the stair gate needs to go up, the reins need to go on, and they have to drive at Noddy speed. You did it yourselves kids.
https://x.com/commuteroo/status/1691858402345996586?s=61&t=wlq_RPAZ5AFe3jBf_Xl1Jw
Probably a little late in the day for the live blog, but no doubt the survey linked in this tweet will eventually reach GBeebies.
By all means add your answers to the survey - fake names and fake emails not always required...
Roadie on a Mountain Bike.
Does someone care?
Good for the Iranian Time Trialist.
I for one welcome our cycling asylum seekers.
At least someone managed to find a legal way of applying for asylum. He ought to tell the Home Secretary, since (IIRC) she didn't have a clue when questioned about (edit) legal avenues/methods for application.
If it's true, how was he granted asylum so quickly? Taking up to 2 years for those arriving by boat, and around 6 months to extend a residency permit for those already living here and married to a British citizen.
Perhaps it's been misreported and he's merely applied.
GB"News" producer ... Just a troll.
Just stirring the pot to get a reaction from the cycling world.
Ignore it, don't repost or respond, and certainly don't report it. Starve it of the publicity it needs, and will become (even more) irrelevant.
Mods put this elsewhere today:
We've now closed the comments section under this story and removed some threads containing comments that break our terms. While it's not explicitly against the rules of our forum or comments section, please try to make sure your comments are on topic and avoid 'trolling'/deliberately provoking others. Don't post abusive comments or make personal attacks against other forum users, and email info [at] road.cc (with a link and screenshot of the offending material if possible) if you spot something that you think crosses this line. Thanks.
I look forward to 2 PBUs being removed.
Yes it's good to see them taking a stance.
While I don't agree with some of the comments they have left, that's likely a matter of opinion and it will be nice if some individuals are removed to make the comments forum a better place for all.
It's just a shame the info [at] road.cc inbox is not monitored.
It's funny how so many people will jump to defend destroying things and setting them on fire because they stop them rat-running whilst also criticising the actions of groups like JSO: vandalism like this, with the costs then being passed on to the taxpayer, is really not the same as sitting-in-the-road civil disobedience. IMO.
(Reposted from the dedicated news story on this matter)
When official statistics seem to show that a frightening proportion of "cyclist accidents" are actually a car driver's fault, I don't think that this is the slam-dunk "gotcha" she seems to think it is.
Pesky AI at it again.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cornwall-66508840
In fact a number of car manufacturers have been researching (maybe some have already put them into production, does anyone know?) external airbags that will inflate when sensors detect a collision with a pedestrian or cyclist, which sounds a great idea.
Hmm... the close-pass would have missed me but the duff safety system (motor industry "self-regulation" maybe?) hit me with a balloon?
I suspect like "self-driving car" this should be a good thing but although the idea sounds straightforward will be very hard to get right. And of course marketing will have it out there before all the issues are addressed.
Of course past experience gives you (and me) every right to be cynical about auto manufacturer claims, however Volvo have apparently been working on a system since 2013 so you never know…
And I'm sure it will work flawlessly.
Volvo, HQ in Sweden, now owned by Geely Auto, so the CCP, best know for their rejection of Human Rights, Fair Trade, Intellectual Property. So I won't be holding my breath for Swedish doing-the-right-thing to make it into any actual products.
Some cars do 'ave em. This article from TRL mentions a few models. Even though they are called "external" air bags, most of the inflation is under the bonnet. It lifts it up a bit, the idea being that you will dent the bonnet with your head without hitting the hard engine bits below.
That article also suggests that most of these devices are set to deploy only when the car is doing less than 30mph. So not very useful since we know that motorists cannot drive at such speeds.
At least one GB news presenter is pro-bike
https://twitter.com/tomhfh/status/1559840812678144000
https://twitter.com/tomhfh/status/533800629450588160
Is GBeebies still a thing then?
They're on the side of charging & locking up protestors (you know, lefty Just Stop Oil types) because of the inconvenience & criminal damage they cause right?
I'm sure the usual dafty politicians and commentators will soon be rushing to condemn this lot of insufferable law breaking miscreants (that sort of protest is wrong after all):
https://www.localgov.co.uk/LTN-vandalism-costs-London-boroughs-850000-/5...
Yep, any time now
Yep. It even survived me appearing on it.
Trying to take it down from within eh? Chapeau sir.